Skip to main content
gai.ra.III
Participant
August 30, 2012
Open for Voting

Adobe, Linux Support, and the Linux Foundation.

  • August 30, 2012
  • 795 replies
  • 76086 views

While generally I've only lurked the Adobe forums I've finally worked up guts to post this. I also know that about every 1-2 months this question is asked but I think it deserves a another go around.

 

My premises is this:

 

Adobe joined the Linux Foundation in 2008 for a focus on Linux for Web 2.0  Applications like Adobe® Flash® Player and Adobe AIR™. Currently Adobe holds a silver membership status with the Linux Foundation. So why in the world do they not have any Creative Cloud Programs available in Linux without the need for WINE and other such workarounds. I think it's a sucky move to support the Linux Foundation and use Linux in the back-end while not doing anything to support actual Linux users who have for at least a decade requested Adobe desktop products on Linux. Sure it's going to take a lot of manpower, financial resources, etc. But to truly support Linux and the Linux Foundation I think it's necessary that y'all do make things like Photoshop and Lightroom available for the Linux desktop. In any regards the wider Linux community would most likely help with testing and debugging programs. We're used to it.

 

795 replies

Participating Frequently
October 20, 2025

Photoshop webapp certainly is usable on Linux.

 

Although I don't think Adobe is as relevant nowadays especially after the release of better tools like Figma, Canva, Davinci Resolve and Rive which has a free tier and also available on every platform. 

 

It's only relevant amongst older generation who is so accustomed to it that switching tools is viable option for them.

 

My generation is very open to other tools. 

 

If Adobe wants to compete with them it has to offer competitive facilities comparable to others in the market.

Participant
October 21, 2025
Hi MesumHussain & Everyone Else,

You have some interesting ideas. Let's discuss some of them.

I like the idea of Google Android and Adobe.. but Google's policies and
practices are obviously /not/ what I or many others would want to bother
with.  I'll be interested to see what comes of it if there's progress
though!

*Is Adobe /much/ less relevant?*

I love Da Vinci Resolve, Krita, Scribus, Audacity, and many other apps
that compete with Adobe. I'm glad you've found alternatives that work
for you, MesumHussain.

That said, everyone is different, and despite your reasonable view
point.... There are a /lot/ of reasons to use Adobe software over
competitors, and /none/ of the reasons most people use and want Adobe
have anything to do with age or general recalcitrance. /Many/ "older IT
nerds" have tried more "new software" over the years than most members
of your generation. We love new software, but we also value the
reliability, independence, control, and often substantially higher
capabilities of locally installed apps. That's not something we see a
lot of in cloud based apps... and in many cases, it's getting worse...
even with Adobe's offerings.

The reasons most people I know use use Adobe include:

1. In most professional/corporate media situations, where collaborators
/expect/ Adobe files or complete Adobe compatibility... none of the
software you've listed would be acceptable. In order to get work,
you are /expected/ to work collaboratively with whatever software
the /company/ uses to save time and avoid issues. Most companies
still use Adobe.
2. I agree that there's definitely a global and technological push
toward the increased use of cloud-based apps (or "software as a
service", otherwise known as SAAS).  Some of it probably
/is/ eroding Adobe's stranglehold over the industry. However, in
contrast to point one,//there are many places, many work-related
issues/requirements, and many regulatory reasons where connection
speeds are too slow, the required bandwidth too high, or policies in
place that prohibit the use of pure cloud apps in an efficient and
profitable manner. A local app is the /only/ way many people can get
the job at hand, /done./
3. Say what you want about a lot of other software, I love DXO Photolab
and Capture One for raw processing, Affinity for subscription free
image editing that has features I can't find in DarkTable/GIMP,
Zerene for focus stacking, and Photomatix for HDR work. For my hobby
work, any of these apps are perfectly fine. I use Reaper instead of
Audition because I like the features of Reaper more. Yet, Adobe apps
still have several /unique/ features which many people use /all/ the
time. I also think that Adobe is what many people of
/all/ generations, are trained to use. Some people just don't have
the time to spare right now to try each and every alternative for
each and every feature found in Adobe. That's hardly the implied
"oldies are set in their ways" rationale I interpreted from your
comments. If I'm wrong, and you didn't mean that, I'm sorry.

You seem to have interpreted my intentions backwards. Yes, I did ask for
Adobe to consider making a Linux version. However, thread is /more
/about addressing the rising displeasure with Windows' lack of
privacy/security/end user rights, the overpriced hardware of Apple gear,
and giving people an option they /might actually want!/

....Which as stated in my original post includes the combination of:

* A free, private, open source OS that /works /on almost any hardware,
* Affordable /quality/ hardware, and
* The ability to use commercial industrial-standard software when needed.

Schools want it, companies (outside of the IT industry) want it,
individuals who own their computer and reasonably expect to use it they
way /they/ desire... /definitely/ want it. We're already seeing this
with commercial games now running on  SteamOS (Based on Arch Linux), and
the /tripling/ of the total number of active devices using Bazzite which
again is another Linux OS optimized for commercial games. That tripling
of devices happened in just 8 months! Freed from running Windows
bloat... games frequently run /better/ on Linux than Windows,  sometimes
even with /inferior/ hardware. So whether you're aiming for a better
gaming experience, or maximising the performance of existing hardware to
save money... imagine if those benefits could be applied to Adobe software!

I started this thread because I /know/ people need to use Linux for
reasons that are just as important as the reasons people use Adobe
listed above. Yes, you can emulate, dual boot, or virtualise entire
Windows systems to get Adobe to work on Linux-like systems, but it's
tedious, expensive, overly complex, and not to mention, less stable than
native apps. In short, it wastes time and computational resources....
and it would be /great/ if Linux had games /and/ Adobe compatibility.

Giving users from all walks of life the ability to save money, and do
things their own way would be provide competitive advantage to anyone
brave enough to take the Linux challenge up.

I just hope this inspires more discussion, ideas, and hopefully actions
by invested parties.

All the best, everyone, and thanks Mesum for contributing!

Harmo.
kglad
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 19, 2025

@MesumHussain21879351h77v 

 

you might be right, but twice as much impetus to support linux is still zero.

nuell_234
Participant
April 29, 2026

so you just loose a bunch of people because windows is dead.

roc97007
Known Participant
April 29, 2026

That’s a good point.  Now more than ever, people running windows 10 are looking for alternates as 10 is end of life and 11 won’t run on their recently purchased hardware.  11 has its own problems, with updates regularly bricking some people’s computers, privacy issues, and an AI built in that nobody wants or needs.

I’ve read that a new business is springing up, helping people migrate from Windows 10 to some form of Linux, usually Ubuntu, Mint, Debian.

Everyone that migrates is a potential lost customer to Adobe.

For existing ACC users, at some point the pain of staying on Windows will exceed the pain of migrating to Gimp and Darktable.

Microsoft is making some really bad decisions right now.  Adobe should think about not following suit.

As I’m sure I’ve said before, fragmentation is not an issue -- do a native port to ANY version of Linux, and we’ll migrate to that.  If you want something enterprise grade, port to Red Hat.  (I’d say “or SUSE” but I’m not sure how relevant SUSE is these days.)  If you want to port to something Windows-like, port to Mint or Zoren.

You won’t have to support umpteen zillion versions of Linux.  Just pick one and go for it.

But do it before people start migrating to ACC alternatives.

Participating Frequently
October 19, 2025

Supporting Linux makes sense now more than ever. 

 

Google is planning to combine Chrome OS and Android and release Android laptops. It will be able to run Linux desktop app in a container just like Chrome OS.

 

Adobe has 3 options in this case, if they don't want to lose revenue from Android laptops. 

 

1) Make full fledged Android apps for all CC apps

 

2) Make full fledged webapps for all CC apps by porting them to WebAssembly 

 

3) Port CC apps to Linux.

 

I think in this case the option which makes most sense is option 2, port to WebAssembly. That way it will work on every platform. 

 

 

kglad
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 18, 2025

there should be auto-replies to every post: "no chance".

Participant
March 25, 2026

Doomer

Community Expert
October 18, 2025

I don't see a chance that Adobe supports Linux in the future. The relevant discussions have been going on for years, and nothing has happened.
I think it makes little sense to continue them. Adobe doesn't see a market for its applications on Linux. And due to the numerous Linux variants, commercial support is probably not possible. 

 

My System: Intel i7-8700K - 64GB RAM - NVidia Geforce RTX 3060 - Windows 11 Pro 25H2 -- LR-Classic 15 - Photoshop 27 - Nik Collection 9 - PureRAW 6 - Topaz Photo AI
Participant
March 25, 2026

Adobe surely has made a point of not supporting Linux and there could be many legitimate and sometime slightly suspect reasons for that.  What is true is that if we wish to make access to creative cloud on linux a reality what is called for is to open our eyes and see those creative and innovative members of the Linux community who are developing and building bridges between different environments in order to achieve our goal as well as theirs.  

 

I call all you guys to action.  find a project that you believe it, be it a fork of Wine, or an emulation like emu or qemu + looking glass and or wineapps, winboat etc. and put your energy behind it.  speak of it, join it, test it and best of all fund it.

 

who knows at the end of this road you will get much more than you asked for.  Not just CC in your favorite linux distribution but a new way of being in your creative practice.

Participating Frequently
October 18, 2025

If they ported CC I'd be able to ditch windows for good.

Known Participant
October 5, 2025

Photoshop is the only reason I’ve put up with Microsoft’s nonsense for so long. But there’s a limit to everything, and I've reached mine. I should have migrated to Linux a long time ago, just as many, many people are doing.

I know you place little value on the 10+ years of money I’ve paid you to use your products, but even so, I’m going to pay for one more month of the Creative Cloud and try to run your apps on Linux. If they run well, I might continue using them for the rest of my life. If they don’t, well, I’ll have to find another application; what can I do?

Perhaps now is the time for you to think about adapting to market trends with Linux-compatible versions. It could be an excellent strategy to recoup the losses resulting from your public conduct, which is equivalent to Microsoft’s: disrespectful. A lot of people would be surprised—I know I would be.

kglad
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 5, 2025

not much chance.

kglad
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 24, 2025

then enjoy linux.

Known Participant
April 24, 2025

We already have Davinci Resolve and Blender for Linux. Why not Creative Cloud? Linux is such a lovely OS. Better than Windows for me. 

Park Street Printers
Known Participant
February 18, 2025

The main reason I currently run Windows 11 is the lack of Adobe's support for Creative Cloud in Linux. I find Windows 11 very annoying, but it is completely stable. (I've never experienced a crash on my two home systems or work system, despite having modified the registry in quite a few instances. Still trying to get rid of Edge!) I just prefer using Linux. The idea of using Proton to enable CC in Linux is appealing to me, but I seriously doubt it will ever happen, and even if it did, there would be no technical support. I don't foresee Linux ever being a supported platform for CC. I hope I'm wrong.