Build better products with our product team
The remove feature appears to work well with the real world scenarios of landscapes etc , but there must be a lot of photographers working in small cramped studios that occasionally get lights or other studio equipment in there shots or subjects that have arms etc outside of the recognised backdrop. It would be nice if studio accessories could be identified.
I've already posted this in the Lightroom ideas, but it is equally important for ACR to have this feature. I’d like to request a dedicated distortion correction tool for tilt-shift and technical camera lenses in Adobe Camera Raw. Many tilt-shift and technical camera lenses do not save shift movements in metadata, making automatic correction difficult. However, some modern lenses, such as the Fujinon GF 30mm TS and 110mm TS, do record shift data, enabling software like Capture One to apply automatic corrections. Rather than attempting to create lens profiles for every possible shift position, a more practical approach would be to calculate distortion based on the full shift range of the lens when shift metadata is available, while also providing manual correction controls for lenses that do not record shift data. Proposed Tool Features: Automatic distortion correction for lenses that record shift metadata, using the full shift range to determine the correct portion of the image circle for distortion calculations. Manual input for X and Y shift values for lenses without metadata support. Sliders for barrel, pincushion, and complex (mustache) distortion to fine-tune corrections. An adjustable field to specify the radius (in mm) where distortion correction begins, as different lenses exhibit distortion at varying distances from the center. A second adjustable field to specify the full image circle radius, providing accurate placement of the shifted image within a larger virtual canvas that encompasses the full range of shift movements. This would allow users to properly align the image before applying distortion corrections. Why This is Needed:Currently, correcting distortion for shifted images requires tedious manual adjustments. For example, with the Nikkor 19mm PC-E, users must manually place the image within a larger canvas and adjust distortion—an inefficient and imprecise workaround. Given that other software already provides automatic corrections for modern lenses and supports manual distortion adjustments for older tilt-shift and technical camera lenses, Adobe should consider adding this capability to ACR. This tool would be a valuable improvement for architectural, commercial, and fine art photographers who rely on these lenses. Thank you for your consideration!
I don’t think I’m the only one who has dragged a window (sequence/effects/etc) by mistake.I also don’t am the only one who feels like it is such a pain in the backside to drag the correct window to the correct original position. I feel like this user experience (dragging windows) could be made much smoother. Anyhow, it makes sense to add a “lock workspace” option to precent windows being dragged out my mistake.
新しい画像生成の際に前の履歴の続きから始まるようになってしまったので、使いにくい。前の履歴は引き続き履歴から再開できるので、新規作成の際はまっさらなルームを用意してほしい。毎回クリアして新しい生成物を作るのは面倒。[Adobe Fireflyへ移動しました:モデレーター]
By default, Layer Markers are locked to layer - it will be good to have options for - - lockedToLayer - and lockedToTime This will be great for music/VO spotting. And there should be a visual difference in the Timeline - perhaps something similar to the small strip at the start/end of a layer stem that demarcates its true start/end.
Layer & Comp Markers provide critical Timeline navigation instruments but they can clutter the timeline and even worse, inadvertently cover/hide layer in-outpoints or Work Area start/end points. Being able to control the transparency of the Container/Icon and the comment separately will be really good while also giving the app a modern look. Their settings can be placed in the Labels Prefs Dialog with 20% being the lowest, allowed selection to prevent ‘accidents’.
I know that UXP is a work in progress and the team is working hard at porting over all functionality from Extendscript. I’m just humbly submitting my vote for getting access to reading and changing the read/write status (formerly setLocked and getLocked in extendscript) of Production projects. Thanks!
Following a discussion on the LR4 beta forum: Converting to CMYK and soft proofing in CMYK are two completely different things, so at least we need a CMYK softproofing. During the last years I ran into a lot of problems due to modern LED lightning on the scene, it is able to produce colors (especially in the blues) far away out of the CMYK color space. Converting pictures to CMYK later after my initial processing can change a picture dramatically, a bit similar to a conversion to b/w. So even if you have to deliver your material in RGB and someone else is doing a professional conversion later, you should be able to predict what can happen to your material! So if you deliver material that will be converted – earlier or later – to CMYK: You need at least a simple soft proof. Otherwise it can happen that you deliver material that simply can’t be published.
I would like to be able to just hit a key to toggle my brush to material picker quickly, as when painting Normals and AO it is tedious to keep switching between the picker and the brush from the toolbar, especially on these gradient sensitive maps. This feature would improve workflow incredibly when adjusting these items. Photoshop, Illustrator etc all do this very quickly, but I was surprised that Substance does not.
For Rectangles, we can define corner roundness, but, unfortunately for Polystars, this is not available. The Polystar features ‘Roundness’ which is nice, but something else. (add that to Rectangle!)
Proportional scrubbing and offset don’t work for properties and keys inside shape groups. Which is a shame. I use shapegroups if I don’t want to clutter my timeline or when I want to use one compound shape layer as a matte. Often these contain animated properties that would benefit mucho from the new proportional offset and scrubbing behavior. I guess this could benefit you too!
Here’s an example:I want to see images that other users have created of line drawings for tattoo designs so that I can use the same settings and prompts that they used to create my own version with different subject matter so that I can hand my artist a line drawing and have him use his own creativity to color it.With no search feature in the gallery, I am forced to endlessly scroll through user created images hoping to find something that comes close to what I was thinking.A gallery search based on keywords used in the creator’s prompt would help tremendously!! Thank you for your consideration.
This will easily AND SAFELY enable us to delete files from Disk using Premiere.
1. Line breaks are ignored when importing text files [Issue] When importing a custom script (.txt file), the line breaks in the text data are completely ignored, forcing users to manually split segments all over again. [Request] Please add an option to "Split segments based on text file line breaks" when importing text files.2. Manual splits in the "Transcript" panel are reset when creating captions [Issue] Even if we manually and cleanly split segments using "Split Segment" in the Transcript panel to match the context of the speech, clicking "Create Captions" completely ignores these manual splits. The software recalculates the splits based solely on maximum character length and duration settings, ruining the adjustments made. [Request] Please add an option in the "Create Captions" preferences to "Preserve current segment splits from the Transcript panel."3. The behavior of the "Split" function in the Captions panel [Issue] When splitting a caption in the Captions panel or on the timeline, the text is not actually split at the cursor's position. Instead, the entire original text is simply duplicated into both the first and second blocks. This forces the user into an incredibly inefficient process of manually deleting the excess text from both blocks every time they split a clip. [Request] Please change the behavior so that when a caption is split, the text data is actually divided at the specified cursor position, rather than duplicated.Improving these specifications would dramatically increase the efficiency of captioning workflows and further enhance the usability of Premiere Pro. Thank you very much for considering these updates for future releases.
I would like to request a feature in Adobe Premiere for a rolling title tool that works well with large amounts of text. I am trying to do credit rolls for TV programs. These credit rolls are a fraction the size of feature film credits, but still. When the paragraph box becomes quite long, the UI becomes so sluggish, that if I wish to highlight a word to edit, delete, etc., it takes up to 5-seconds to just select. Then, when trying to type, the response from keyboard press to actual character appearing on-screen is so slow, it makes it very difficult to type. So, in a nutshell, the longer the text box, the slower the UI becomes.This is on a PC with 64GB of RAM i9-13900K, RTX 4090. I think it’s not the machine or config.Not to bring up the past, but the old “Title Tool” used to have no problems with this.This has been a working problem for me for years.A look at improvement on the Essential Graphics Tool would be greatly appreciated. For example there is still a need for a text crawl (which became unavailable once the title tool was deprecated). Many Thanks!
I was delighted to see, when I launched the CC app, that it asked me for feedback on the ‘Home’ page. I gave feedback, and explained how it’s just dreadful, and needs a serious redesign. We do not want to be bombarded with adverts, AI crap, suggestions, etc.99% of the time, I want to check for app updates, and then probably install those updates. That’s it. I can do EVERYTHING else from within the apps. Please, Adobe, make the CC app what is was maybe a year or two ago - a simple interface to manage apps, and not much else. We pay a lot of money for this, and I do not expect to be advertised and shouted at by this hideous mess of a monstrosity. PLEASE take on board some input from designers (who are, may I remind you, the vast majority of your market) and tell the marketing morons to go away and stay away, and stop throwing ugly adverts and suggestions at this poor app. Or preferably fire all the Adobe marketing morons whose sole job is to make the whole Adobe experience much, much worse than it needs to be.
I’m not very impressed with the new format. Precise dates are missing from older posts, many of my replies, and conversations are not visible. I don’t care for the partial image preview when you share images or screenshots.The create a post system requires way too many steps to create a thread, and the Category section requires a bunch of scrolling when creating a new post, and the options are not in alphabetical order. More clicks, more scrolling, and it’s not as easy to find threads you were working on. Still needs more work. I know this post is not about After Effects, but I can't find a category for the forum… There used to be one.
I would like too see the mask marked in red (my mask) in the list marked in blue (options) in attached screen shot. Better if LR can automatically (using AI like body parts in portrait pictures) create some luminance and color masks too.
Currently, to open a bin, users need to double-click with the mouse, which can be time-consuming, especially when working on large projects with multiple bins.I propose the addition of a keyboard shortcut that allows users to open a bin in place, similar to how pressing the Enter key in File Explorer navigates inside a selected folder. This feature would streamline the workflow by providing a quick and easy way to access the contents of a bin without the need for repetitive mouse clicks.Implementing this enhancement would not only improve the user experience but also streamline the workflow for editors working on projects of with may bins. It would make navigating project bins more intuitive and efficient, ultimately enhancing productivity and user satisfaction.Thank you for considering this feature request. I believe it would make Adobe Premiere Pro a more user-friendly and efficient tool for video editors.
It would be great if we could toggle off (and on) the grey window that shows source clip data in the timeline when the cursor hovers over a clip - it's un-necessary for me and gets in the way of editing when I'm using waveforms to identify the start & finish of words (which is incrediby frustrating!).
Ich erstelle einen digitalen Reisebericht über die Bretagne. Dabei sollen Videos vertont werden. Jetzt habe ich das Problem, dass französische Namen nicht korrekt ausgesprochen werden. Eine Möglichkeit wäre, wenn Firefly “Sprache zu Text” die internationale Lautschrift “IPA” unterstützen würde. Tut sie scheinbar nicht. Habe ich da eine Möglichkeit von Firefly übersehen oder kann es das tatsächlich nicht? Wenn es nicht möglich ist, wäre interessant zu erfahren, ob es in naher Zukunft implementiert wird.
I am an editor based in China who primarily works on the final cut of films and TV series. I have been using Premiere Productions for many years and am very fond of it. However, Adobe faces many challenges in China. I would like to voice a common concern shared by most editors in our country and hope you can help us resolve it. We can’t even find a single place in China where we can buy genuine Adobe software; we have to go all the way to Hong Kong to purchase it. I find it unbelievable how Adobe has neglected us. In China, we are unable to access many Adobe features, such as Adobe Firefly and Frame.io. We hope you can help us gain access to these powerful tools. We hope you will introduce more practical features specifically tailored for film and TV productions. In many countries and regions, the editing software ecosystem is being dominated by DaVinci Resolve, as Resolve holds the final say over the output process. However, I still believe that Premiere’s editing capabilities and ecosystem surpass those of Resolve; yet, Premiere needs more ways to integrate with Resolve. We often face challenges when handing off projects to colorists after final cuts, as collaboration is hindered by differences in the algorithms and logic between the two software programs. We hope there will be a way to quickly import Premiere projects into Resolve for professional color grading. If the difficulty of transferring between the two software programs could be reduced, it would encourage many film and TV editors to return to Premiere. We hope you can hear our heartfelt message. Thank you very much.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.