Skip to main content

Filter by idea status

10000+ Ideas

Joe UParticipating Frequently

P: Add Collaborative Proofing to Lightroom Classic & Lightroom DesktopOpen for Voting

FYI I'm a real person that used ChatGPT to write this request because I don't want to spend a bunch of time doing it, but wanted to let you know I'm a real user!    Dear Adobe Team,   Please add Collaborative Proofing to Lightroom Classic and Lightroom Desktop. Right now, this feature is only available in Lightroom Web, making the proofing process unnecessarily complicated for photographers who rely on Classic for professional workflow management.   I frequently send proofs to models so they can select their favorite images, but the current workflow is frustratingly inefficient: 1. I have to sync images to Lightroom Cloud, which isn’t ideal for my local storage workflow. 2. Then, I have to switch to Lightroom Web just to send the proofing link. 3. Once the model makes their selections, I have to go back into Lightroom Web to create a new album that syncs to Classic—because the selections don’t automatically transfer. 4. After that, I have to manually move the selected images from that synced album back into the original collection in Lightroom Classic to continue working on them.   This constant jumping between Lightroom Classic, Lightroom Web, and Lightroom Cloud makes proofing far more complicated than it should be. Proofing should be available directly in Lightroom Classic and Lightroom Desktop, with client selections syncing seamlessly back into Classic without requiring a separate album or manual sorting.   What’s Needed • Collaborative Proofing should be integrated into Lightroom Classic and Lightroom Desktop. • Selections made by clients or models should automatically appear in Classic as a filter or smart collection—without requiring album workarounds in Lightroom Web. • If cloud sync is required, there should be an option to sync only proofing collections rather than forcing full catalog sync.   Why This Matters   Many working photographers, especially in portrait, fashion, and event photography, need a fast, integrated way to collect selects without jumping between multiple Lightroom versions. Proofing should be an easy, built-in part of Lightroom Classic, not something that requires tedious manual workarounds.   Please consider implementing this to make Lightroom a more seamless and efficient tool for professionals.   Thank you for considering

Photoshop for Ipad - Feature Requests from an IllustratorOpen for Voting

I'm an illustrator and have been getting a workflow with Photoshop for Ipad and ios. I have tried both Fresco and Photoshop, and it is interesting that they both have features and abilities I like, but one doesn't have it all! In general, Photoshop for ios seems to suit my needs better. But there are a few features I'd like to suggest. Gradient: Foreground Color to Transparent - There's no foreground color to transparent option for gradients. This is something I use all the time. There is a workaround where you can flood a layer with color, then apply a layer mask and do black to white gradients to mimic it, but being able to have a foreground to transparent gradient would improve my workflow so much!Brush Size Cursor - This feature is present in Desktop Photoshop and can be toggled on in Fresco, but Ios photoshop has no way to see the maximum brush size. As someone who draws with pen pressure quite a bit, I like seeing how far the brush can go so I can get crispy edges if I really press down! Transform Warp - This is my favorite transform. It allows me make something a bit curvier or have more motion, even if it distorts the drawing a bit. Great for thumbnailing.Customizable keyboard shortcuts - this would be amazing, so I can keep my keybinds consistent between devices.More keyboard shortcuts available in general:* The ability to use keyboard shortcuts for things like opacity, flow, and hardness would be wonderful.* Being able to hold shift and alt and have it allow me to add to a selection or subtract from it. I know there's a touch control for this. I'm a keyboard/remote artist and am trying to keep my left hand from moving too much, and enjoy having all of the options avaiable at my fingertips without switching from keyboard to screen.* Alt for the brush turning into an eyedropper sample is also one of my favorite things. Same as above. I realize there's a touch shortcut for this. Keyboard shortcut support would be a great secondary way to do it, and allow for more accessibility options and workflow options.* Shift to select multiple layers - again, I know the touch controls exist! Keyboard would be nice!* A shortcut to fit the image to screen* A Save shortcut. Fresco has this, as does Desktop PS. Would be great to have for ipad so I can just hit that every now and again.

dans46960483Participant

DREAMWEAVER E-COMMERCE INTEGRATIONOpen for Voting

DREAMWEAVER  E-COMMERCE  INTEGRATION OK !  All modern  sites  have  blogs  and  e-Commerce integration and  Contact Forms etc. With  DW  this is HELL, But  I did  manage  using   SnipCart integration by  adding   Script and  some  codeand  get  those  BUY  buttons  or  ADD-to-CART button  with product  QT.  and  definition and  the  Shopping  CART with paiement  method (Credit or Paypal)  and the CART Total on  the  top of my  website  etc.many hours of  coding and testing, but it  does  work well once  setup. But it  would be  much easier having  all  this   INSIDE  DW. !!Most  new  Website builder  do have  this  integration. (Wappler)  The  assets   tool bar (panel)  where  we  save  our  images is  very difficult to  manageWhen  we  select an image  for  an INSERT .We CANNOT  create   sub-folders  to  organize our images.  An important  improvement. OK -  Guys !  Hope to get  some    feedback,Cheers, DS.    

dinmik_8583Participant

Select Multiple Clips and Export with Their Own NamesOpen for Voting

Dear Officials, Most of the time, we work with many clips on the Timeline. We name them, but exporting them with their names is quite difficult. I have prepared GIF animations showing the issue we are experiencing. Of course, in normal use, I assign the Rename function to the F2 key as a shortcut to rename clips. When I hover over the clip I want to rename, I press F2. However, I cannot assign a shortcut to the Send to Media Encoder button in the Export Window. I have attached a screenshot. 😥 I spent about a day editing videos to prepare these GIF animations. I hope you like and consider them. Also, if you could bring back the old Export Window from Premiere Pro 2020, we would be very happy. If you can provide a solution to these issues, millions of mice will be happy. You will save the world from millions of unnecessary clicks. You are amazing, and I hope you make this happen. Thank you in advance, and I wish you all the best. With love and respect,Dinamikler (This translation was done by ChatGPT-4o.) Original Turkish text: Değerli Yetkililer, Çoğu zaman Timeline’da birçok klip ile çalışıyoruz. Bunlara isim veriyoruz. Fakat bunları isimleri ile birlikte dışa aktarmak çok zor oluyor. Ekte yaşadığımız sorunu gösteren GIF animasyonları hazırladım. Tabi ki normal kullanımda kliplerin isimlerini değiştirmek için F2 tuşuna kısayol olarak Rename’i ekliyorum. İsmini değiştirmek istediğim klibin üzerine gelince F2’ye basıyorum. Ancak Export Penceresi'nde bulunan Send to Media Encoder düğmesine bir kısayol ekleyemiyorum. Resmini ekledim. 😥 Bu GIF animasyonları hazırlamak için yaklaşık bir gün video kurgu yaptım. Umarın beğenir ve değerlendirirsiniz. Ayrıca Premier Pro 2020’deki eski Export Penceresini kullanım imkanı sağlarsanız, ayrıca çok mutlu oluruz. Bu sorunlarımıza bir çözüm üretebilirseniz, milyonlarca fare mutlu olacak. Gereksiz yere milyonlarca tıklamadan dünyayı kurtarmış olacaksınız. Siz süpersiniz, umarım yaparsınız. Şimdiden teşekkürlerimizi sunar, mutlu işler dileriz. Sevgi ve saygılarımla,Dinamikler

howiemnet
howiemnetInspiring

Long standing wish / issue: please don't hide waveforms for muted audio tracksOpen for Voting

Posted about this issue around 10 years ago, but it's been really driving me up the wall today so I figured I'd moan about it afresh. Being able to have audio waveforms visible in your timeline alongside keyframes etc is wonderful. Most of my work relies on tight integration with music cues, so being able to show a layer's audio and make that waveform nice and big so I can see the hit points is essential. Sometimes the hit points are audible but not clearly visible in the waveform, so I generate a metronome audio track as well and drop that into the comp — that way I can see the hit points. Don't want to hear it, just see the waveform.  Or I'll have a preview version of some audio (maybe something with SFX in it) and I want to line up better samples in AE for a quick turnaround. The issue: if a layer has the audio switched off/muted (the speaker switch), the waveform completely disappears. So if you need to see the waveform for any reason, you can't avoid hearing it too.  Request: for disabled/muted audio layers, can you consider just greying the waveform out slightly, but not making it invisible. The fact the waveform correctly represents changes/animations on the Audio Level parameter is nice — you can see fades etc — but if the track's muted/disabled, there's no need to completely hide the waveform ... and in some cases it makes life a little harder. For now I mute and unmute and mute and unmute and every now and again accidentally render with that guide track unmuted and then have to replace the audio in the rendered file afterwards. Anyway, I've finished moaning... you've got another 10 years before I'll bang on about it again 

JBWillParticipant

Make the Generative AI an Actual Tool, not a ToyOpen for Voting

Since Adobe has taken a simp position on the use of Generative AI for anything that is actually useful to people beyond making clouds and rainbows. It would be nice to have the ability to point the app to an API of our choosing, because if we are being brutally honest, the nanny police make it impossible to use, and the AI it does use sucks. I am a comic illustrator and have used Photoshop and Illustrator for 20 years or more now and anything with muscles, fighting, blood or anything real world is a no go and if I have to keep looking at that stupid orange box that is the most unhelpful piece of crap I have ever seen tell me I violate the terms again for trying to put long hair on someone or a helmet, or make their sword being stabbed into the heart of an enemy something I cannot edit, I will just go back to hand drawing and be done with Adobe. I have investments into my own generative AI as I am certain others do as well. Giving us API access to point CC to our own AI is a fair thing to ask. This will absolve Adobe of responsibility for how we choose to use generative AI, and it will allow those of us who need to use it for something more than puppy dog tails and ice cream cones a way to use Generative AI how it was intended to be used, to create things. If that's not possible, how about instead of trying to avoid any kind of controversy you get out of the way, let adults be adults. If someone uses it for something illegal then call the police because you are not the police, you have no morals or moral compass as an entity, stop pretending to know whats best for people and instead do what you should be doing and that is to provide the service so we can use it how we see fit, and only intervene if someone does something illegal. That is a novel idea isn't it?