I started using Resolve Dec. 2019. It took a few months to adjust to its way of terminology and functioning. I maintain a CC subscription because I still use Ai, Ae, Ps, and AME frequently. I get jobs to update projects I did in Pr prior to my switching, and the vast majority of the time, it's a nightmare. About half my footage is unlinked, even though I haven't changed any file paths. About 3/4 of the time, my Sequence won't even play, even if I turn the fx button off, disabling effects. What is fairly reliable, though, is the ability to do an XML export, and get the f out of Pr to import into Resolve. There's a downside to this though, because Pr has ONE big advantage over Resolve: Nesting. Resolve doesn't respect Sequence in Sequence cropping as Pr does. In Pr, f you make a 680 x 1080 Nest, and drop 1920 x 1080 footage into it, and put that Nest into a 1920 x 1080 Sequence, the Nest is cropped appropriately. You can pan and scan in the Nest, and use the Nest as a Clip, using the Motion effects, and it works wonderfully. Conversely, if you try this in Resolve, the Nest (called a Compound Clip or just another Timeline), the Nest ignores the pixel dimensions of the Timeline / Nest, and displays the full raster of the 1920 x1080 footage inside the 680 x 1080 Nest/Compound Clip/Timeline! It's remarkably stupid implementation on BMD's part. So, I often have to stay in Pr to update those older projects, painful as it may be. I'm constantly gobsmacked that, given all the "improvements" in Pr in the last two years, it's still a dog on my $15,000 MacPro. And, I'm continuously baffled that Pr hasn't implemented a proper Track Matte feature, after all this time.
... View more