Skip to main content
Mattrman
Participating Frequently
May 7, 2013
Question

[Locked] No perpetual licenses are you serious?

  • May 7, 2013
  • 109 replies
  • 962943 views

I just head that Adobe was planning to abandon its perpetual license in favor of an on line only rental program. At first I thought that this must be a joke. I have been using adobe products for 18 years. Primarily Photoshop, Illustrator and Indesign. I am currently an owner of CS 6 Master collection and obviously do upgrade my products and have consistently done so over the years. I am not connected to the internet full time and in fact my work computer is never directly connected to the internet. So how does this work? Is adobe now forcing me to connect to the internet - it seems that this is the case.

In regards to upgrade cycles, I dont want to rent my software and be tied to a rental agreement. I want to upgrade when I choose, not rent my software like some kind of loaner program!

I want to purchase the software then not worry about it. For instance when I travel, I dont want to be bogged down with downloads and upgrades chewing up my bandwidth. I have traveled to many places where internet access is very limited. Downloading from a wireless card in China is painful, I dont want to be bogged down with no software or large megabyte downloads costing me a fortune on the other side of the planet.

Adobe I know that I am just one person and you will probably not listen to me but did someone ask? No one asked me about this. How simple could this be - I want to buy the software then use it when I want where I want, is this too much to ask?

Please let me continue to use this software in the way that I have used it for so long. If others wish to have the creative cloud then great! More power to them, don't alienate your other users. Please provide both alternatives.

Best regards - Matt

109 replies

February 13, 2016

I see the general opinion is next to 100% that Adobe is using the clear force to put his customers into the lost position. I understand that everybody follows his own interest; I understand that Adobe would like all the money in the world that it can grab. It seems to me what Adobe did with abandoning perpetual license is just the big monopoly game played everywhere these days.

Well the usual ordinary people like us cannot strike back immediately. We as customers are clearly humiliated. Mr Chamber.... in his post from year 2013 said Adobe will continue selling CS6 product on indefinitely? What a joke! I downloaded these days CS6 and when pressed Buy button, do you know what I got? Do you guess what I got:

"Sorry, this page is not available.....Error 404"

Yes, we are the lowest pawns in the classical monopoly game with customers, as somebody said - like Microsoft Windows and a lot of other big players. I think the guys from Adobe and similar companies over-played a bit. The time will show if I am right or wrong.

==========================================================================

Now let's be active! I suggest everybody on this thread search Yandex or Google for "photoshop alternative", or "adobe alternative", and post here his suggestions! Let Adobe see what we shall do with his product: just through it away, even after decades of supporting it. We are the ones to put Adobe to the throne - we can and surely will put it down. Adobe deserves that.

February 16, 2016

And allow me one more important information.

In the meantime I made a good investigation and found a beautiful software with close functionality to Adobe Photoshop. After about several decades of constant joining and perfecting Adobe Photoshop, having several books read and copy books full of notes on Photoshop, I have a wonderful revealing experience with my new software. Tonight I payed $79,99 for the ultimate version after checking the trial version. I am still downloading 4 additional packages that I get for free with my Ultimate edition which seems to be more than even Photoshop have. Still I do not expect all the filters and possibilities in my new software as it was in Photoshop, but I am ready to change. I don't care if Photoshop is the best, for me descent people and 'next-to-the-best' software is perfectly good for me. I didn't believe it would be so easy to transform myself in such a short time of just a few days, and that is the reason I write this note to everybody.

I should like so much to tell you the name of the replacement program almost equal to Photoshop, but I guess some "democrat" could accuse me of spamming or advertising... The software has dark look and natural quick learning curve and am still discovering the possibilities. For now, I did editing of pictures for my CMS site articles with no problem. One well known company makes it (5 letters :-)))

Herbert2001
Inspiring
February 16, 2016

@slavne: By now everyone is aware of Photoshop alternatives such as Photoline, Affinity Design and Photo, Gimp, Xara, Sketch, Krita, InkScape, Corel Draw/Photo Paint, Pixelmator, Acorn, PaintShop Pro, Serif PhotoPlus, or even a full license of Photoshop Elements with the ElementsXXL extension.

Yours would be? Probably Serif PhotoPlus? The issue with PhotoPlus (and many other would-be competitors) is that it only supports up to 16 bit per channel. Photoline and Krita do support full 32bit per channel editing. Affinity Photo is about to support it.

Often CMYK is not properly supported either.

Anyway, many alternatives out there, both open source and commercial. Your message will not be censored just because you happen to mention a competing product.

Participant
January 21, 2016

I also think is a huge mistake to rent the software, if this continues I'll be using other designing programs, you should keep the perpetual license mode or you'll be losing more clients, I understand this is for getting better profits but you are just walking over your clients. As we know there are more options to it as long as adobe don't change back

afallenmind
Participant
December 30, 2015

Wow, two years later and it's still being called a bad decision. I was coming here to see if I could ALSO buy the stand alone program without this whole paying-per-month stuff. Look, I see both sides of it and I think that if someone can afford the monthly plan, but not a lump sum, the monthly is the way to go. The BS of it all is that there is no other option. And really, we all know why.


Adobe: Come on, guys. Seriously, whoever is running this idea: ya gotta stop trying to nickle and dime your customers to death. It's just not good business. For example, and this is just off the top of my head, I myself had that lump sum of money that I saved up to get After Effects. Buuuuut...... you guys lost my business, because I will not pay per month. Which sucks, because I had been hoping for a very long time to get AE. Thanks for messing it up for a looooooooooot of potential customers, including a long time customer of Adobe products such as myself.


DV19
Participant
February 6, 2016

This situation really makes me sad.... I've own Adobe products (Illustrator & Photoshop) for nearly 20 years, have bought a lot of updates over that time (not every one but most) and now I'm at the end of the rope with Ill-CS5 and PS-CS6.... Not being able to buy the next version really sucks.... I only use these programs every couple of weeks, but I like having them and wish I could get newer versions... The "rental-subscription" deal is BS as far as I'm concerned and I can't believe Adobe is turning their back on me... I feel betrayed!  

Participant
December 7, 2015

Blackmagic's DaVinci Resolve 12 and Fusion 8 are already much better softwares than Adobe Premiere and After Effects. If adobe doesn't ditch this horrific plan less and less users will buy their monthly subscriptions, Adobe has made a bad move....

DAVIDE PEPE
Known Participant
December 7, 2015

I don't know those software but I think people is so disappointed that they'll leave Adobe for this terrible sales choice apart from the existence of better software.

A lot of people I know stopped to buy or upgrade with Adobe. In Italy there is people who is desperately try to get a copy of  CS6 to avoid to pay for a rental plan.

As an independent artist I can really really understand them. There are months in which having to pay even just 60 Euro for the rental of the suite is simply not affordable.

I repeat I don't want to have their software for free I'm simply requesting to have the chance to buy and keep using it until I'll be able again to buy a future release.

I'm very sorry people is just able to be disappointed and don't write here. I think here there is just the 0.000001% of the people I've heard.

This rental choice has been a really SHAMEFUL and disappointing way to bind users to the adobe company.

I really really loved Adobe!!!

November 24, 2015

I just want to chime in here as well.  I love the Adobe suite of products.  I love them enough that I frequently recommend them to people... friends, family, coworkers, sometimes even strangers.  However, I myself am a hobbyist user - I'm not a professional, and I only count as a student on those occasions when I sign up for some random online course or another.  Which is to say, some months I'll use a couple of the apps nearly every day - but there are also stints where I go several months without opening even one, or may just need them to open a random project file or two for some tangential purpose.

I've been clinging to my CS5.5 license since CC arrived, hoping that eventually the kinks would get worked out and there would be some sort of subscription solution that fits me (or that Adobe would go back to offering perpetual licenses alongside the cloud subscription), but I still don't feel like it has happened.  The subscription cost for the photography suite seems reasonable, especially if you can qualify as a student, but I tend to light up a lot more of the suite in my tinkering.  So to continue using Adobe software the way I do currently, I would need the full suite.  However, I can't justify paying $40 a month every month for something I'm just doing for fun - even if I can get an edu subscription, $20 a month is a pretty hefty fee.

Here's what I think I want, assuming perpetual licenses will not be coming back.  ):  First off, I would move to CC *immediately* if I could get the full suite for $5 a month - even if it was $10 a month, I would seriously consider it.  But seeing as how that's probably not in the realm of possibility, I think a pricing tier like this would work for me (using current edu pricing as a baseline):

$5 for the first single app

$2 for each additional app after the first

$10 for the photography suite (or better yet, pick N apps, where N is the number currently in the photography suite)

$20 for the full suite

With this pricing model, I would probably find a way to move to CC.  I wouldn't be 100% happy, because I'd probably only subscribe to the apps I use most, while currently I use a lot more... but there would be enough benefits in CC to make it work.

November 24, 2015

Another pricing model I could go for:

Assign a "point" cost to each of the apps.  The bigger + more popular apps like Photoshop and After Effects would cost more "points".  Subscriptions pricing tiers would then give you a certain number of points that you could use to pick a set of apps for the month.  For example:

After Effects - 5 points

Audition - 2 points

Dreamweaver - 2 points

Illustrator - 3 points

Lightroom - 3 points

Photoshop - 4 points

$10 - 10 points

$15 - 20 points

$20 - 40 points

I could make that work as a hobbyist, especially if I could change the set of apps I have selected every month.  I could simply plan my projects in advance, and would be happy again because I'd essentially still have access to the whole suite - just not all at the same time.  That's a little lame, but I'd be ok with it as a solution.  The only thing then is that I wouldn't want to be bothered to select a new set as soon as the 1st of the month rolled around.  The ideal user experience would be to let me pick my set of apps initially, and then unlock it for reconfiguration after a month locked in on that set.  If I'm still happy with the current set of apps, I don't have to do anything.  But as soon as I want to make a change, I can go in and do it once the month is up.  Doing so would start a new lockdown period.

November 24, 2015

Even better still would be if there was a flexible pricing option based on the aforementioned "point" system.  For instance, I select the $15 plan and get 20 points.  Which is to say, I can't exceed 20 points without changing my subscription.  But if I use less, I am only charged up to the previous pricing tier.  So for example if I only use one app in June, then in June I am only charged $10 because my utilization falls below the $10 pricing tier.  This makes the point tracking a bit harder, but I think it would still be possible:

- When you select an app to add to your current subscription set, the points used to select it are put into lockdown

- After 1 month, the app is removed from the active set, the points come out of lockdown and are placed back into the pool

- If I want to use the app again, I am prompted to allocate the points again a la "This app is not currently part of your subscription - you can add it for 4 points.  You currently have 8/20 points available.  Add it now? Y/N"

- Unallocated points are tracked to determine their total duration, and if their utilization is low enough to fall below the cost of the previous pricing tier, then that (lower) charge is applied instead

I think this fits very nicely with hobbyist usage because you essentially pay to play.  If you don't play for a month, you don't shell out a bunch of money for nothing.  And you still get to pick what you play with.  It is a little complicated, but I'm willing to bet it would still appeal to a lot of my user segment - maybe it could be offered in addition to the "regular" plans just as one more option.  But this way us hobbyists don't get cut out.  (:

Participant
November 18, 2015

I am not very happen about it either, I only need his every now and then, I don't want to have to pay a subscription! I may not use it for a whole month, yet still pay! Pleas adobe give us normal pay and nothing mor. Just pay a price ad then that's it

85Dragons
Participant
October 31, 2015

So how do I go about the one year subscription? What do I do If I need Premiere Pro + After Effects just, lets say, for three months ONLY? I don't want to pay for the whole year. Please help.

Known Participant
October 31, 2015

Hello, I'll be traveling abroad from Saturday October 17th-Sunday, November 1st. I will have access to email, but my response time may be a bit slow due to the time difference.

Be patient, and I will get back with you as soon as I can.

Thank you.

Dan

Participant
October 19, 2015

i'm against the cloud too. On adobe faq is written:

"Can I purchase a perpetual license for Creative Suite 6?

Yes, you can still buy CS6 products by contacting a regional Adobe call center, but we highly recommend Creative Cloud because it features all the latest creative software, including more than 500 features that have been added since Creative Suite 6. To purchase by phone, call 800-929108."

i called the call center, the chat, the forum and so on.... this is not serious! this is NOT true and i can't purchase my own software.

Participant
September 8, 2015

I 100% agree! Adobe should think twice about forcing longtime users to subscription. You should keep the option to own the licenses as many of us as design professionals do not want to be forced to share our work in the cloud. We should have the option to use the software and upgrade when we choose.

You will be losing a lot of customers because of this option.

You should find a better solution this year as many designers will be using other resources, which is much of your revenue.

Customer loyalty and qualify of product should be thought about at your company as whole rather than Greed on a monthly basis!

Participant
July 24, 2015

I agree. It is absolutely ridiculous and a greedy call. Let's see the truth behind why adobe does this: more money. I am a student. Even at student prices I would NEVER pay a monthly subscription for adobe products. I use photoshop CS5 maybe once or twice a month. Some months I won't use it and others I'll use it almost everyday. My work does not revolve around adobe products- therefore why should i waste money for something I won't use one month but maybe the next??

So lets see: for software that has the potential to be used for many years after its release, adobe does not make any money unless you upgrade to the newest software. So ideally, you could use Photoshop CS3 for 10 years after its release and still achieve some really amazing results and not be too "far behind the other guys" with the newest version. Adobe doesn't like this. They don't want average joe to pay every 5-10 years. They want a consistent stream of cash.

Looking at the FAQ, you also NEED INTERNET CONNECTION. Let me explain why people who say "you don't need internet connection" are incorrect. Let me quote an article published by adobe: http://www.adobe.com/inspire/2012/06/creative-cloud-answers.html.

  • "They do not need to be online to use the products..."

BUT

  • "Of course, an Internet connection is required at times to make sure their software is up-to-date and to verify their membership is active (paid for)..."

                    -Julie Campagna

So what does this mean? This means that you can only use the software if you connect to the internet at least once per month. Why? Like the above quote, Adobe needs to make sure you are legitimately using their software. It's now their property and you are renting it. You do not own the rights to it for personal use. You have the right to use it as long as you are in a contract with them. You own the files you create with the software, so rest easy. Because adobe is switching their payment system (monthly/annual charges instead of a one-time fee for physical CD or Digital Download), their servers will contact your computer and keep telling the software to function normally IF you keep paying the monthly/annual fee. Their servers will be waiting for your computer (more specifically, any adobe program you have) to contact them and ask in computer talk: "should I keep functioning normally or not?" And, no you cannot download the CC suite and rip out your ethernet card and cancel your subscription next month and still expect functionality. Nor can you add server IPs to your host file to prevent communication. Any disruption with the line of communication (either no internet or intentional tampering) will trigger the built-in safeguards.

IF you have no internet but WANT to use this draconian software, then purchase a prepaid yearly plan. That way you will only need to be in a place with internet once to download the program files and consummate the setup. If you do not have internet or easy access to internet at least once a month, DO NOT purchase the monthly plan. You have to do a prepaid option so the servers tell the program in computer talk, "function for a whole calendar year date even If we don't talk for one year from now."

So how do I feel about this change by adobe? Well, I hate it quite honestly. I hate anything cloud-based or demanding monthly payment (w/ exception to Netflix). And I hate paying for things I cannot own. If you give a company your money, are you renting it out to them or giving it to them? If the answer is the latter, then you should own what you pay for. That's my belief. Again, Netlix my personal exception. lol. I will NEVER purchase another Adobe product again. This tactic has disgusted me and as a result I will purchase Corel and be more receptive to the idea of pirating old adobe software on torrent sites. Stupid move adobe. You lost a large market of casual users and kept a smaller percentage of professional users as your customer base while promoting alternatives like piracy and competitor software.