Skip to main content
Rikk Flohr_Photography
Community Manager
August 13, 2024
Question

P: Generative Remove Feedback (Lr Classic & Lr Eco)

  • August 13, 2024
  • 617 replies
  • 565800 views
This post applies to Lightroom Classic and the Lightroom Ecosystem products.
Camera Raw feedback can be found here.
 
Generative Remove makes it easier to remove unwanted objects and distractions with a simple gesture, even on complex backgrounds. For more accurate results, be sure to include the object's shadow in your selection and/or expand its size. 
 
Detect Objects uses AI to find the objects underneath a brushed area. The masked areas will now appear larger than the Early Access version of this feature. You can also circle objects for quicker selection now. 
 
We have also updated the spot selection experience to make it easier to manage variations, switch the fill type, refine the selection area, or re-generate as needed. 
 
Batch updating is also now supported for Generative Remove spots. 
 
Try out the latest updates and share your feedback with us here. Please also include the following details in your post: 
  • App version
  • System details
  • Example image(s) if you wish to share

Our team continually monitors this thread to track issues for future improvement. Thanks!
 
Lisa Ngo: Lightroom Product Manager

 

Posted by:

617 replies

Participant
March 4, 2025

Hi, I am trying to understand why my generative remove attempts are sometimes very blurry compared to the rest of the photo, even with small patches. It was the case in all my session yesterday. For some reason, today, simply regenerating the same spots gives better results (but still blurry). I have the feeling Photoshop does better here, at least, is more consistent.
My photos are not high resolution (only 12MP DNG from a Pixel 6a)...

johnrellis
Legend
March 4, 2025

[This post contains formatting and embedded images that don't appear in email. View the post in your Web browser.]

 

@CedricSimon: "I am trying to understand why my generative remove attempts are sometimes very blurry compared to the rest of the photo, even with small patches. It was the case in all my session yesterday. For some reason, today, simply regenerating the same spots gives better results (but still blurry)."

 

Generative AI Remove often doesn't match the surrounding noise/grain with replacement patches.  Sometimes running Denoise first significantly improves the match.  If that doesn't help, please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo (not a screenshot) and attach a screenshot showing what you've selected for Remove. That will let us see more precisely what the issue might be.

 

"I have the feeling Photoshop does better here, at least, is more consistent."

 

PS and LR use the same Adobe Firefly Generative AI Remove, though their user interfaces are different, and they have different other remove modes (e.g. Heal, Clone, and Content-Aware in LR). So when comparing Generative Remove in the two apps, in LR make sure you've got Remove mode selected with Use Generative AI selected:

 

and in PS make sure Mode: Generative AI On is selected:

 

If you encounter an example where Generative Remove behaves differently in the two apps, it would be good to post an example here (with unmodified, full-resolution JPEGs).  To date, no one has posted an example where the two apps differ.

Participant
March 6, 2025

Well, I am realizing that in PS I was not using the "remove tool" from Camera Raw, but the "generative fill" floating windows, and I simply enter nothing, so basically it removes my selection. 
So in the end, in PS I was not doing the modification on the DNG file, but on a "flatten/exported" version of it, after Camera Raw has done its work. This could explain the small differences I noticed!

 

Participant
March 3, 2025

Remove AI does not work. No apply buttom. Instead of removing the imge is being replaced.

johnrellis
Legend
March 3, 2025

"Instead of removing the imge is being replaced."

 

See this short article for how to remove objects more reliably:
https://www.lightroomqueen.com/generative-remove-replace/

Most complaints about Remove are addressed in the article. But if it doesn't help, please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo (not a screenshot). With nearly every one of the many dozen problem photos posted here, we've been able to show how to quickly remove the desired objects.

Participating Frequently
March 1, 2025

When I use generative fill in LRC it often shows the outline of the area that I selected, leaving a border. I've attached an unmodified jpeg as well as a screenshot of the before and after where you can see the line of the selection. 

johnrellis
Legend
March 2, 2025

[This post contains formatting and embedded images that don't appear in email. View the post in your Web browser.]

 

Often, Remove doesn't match tones well in flat tonal areas, as in your example. Sometimes you can fix that by selecting a larger area:

  

(You can get rid of the newly added wall outlet with a second application of Remove.)

 

Other techniques for ameliorating a tone mismatch: make the selection more raggedy; use short strokes with the Heal tool around the boundary to get better feathering; use the Brush mask and set Texture, Clarity, and Sharpness low to blur the area.

 

valentinosh
Participating Frequently
March 1, 2025

i do it to remove a face and in the place it generates new faces.

why not put a tab , with the old options ? like cloning and stuff

 

lots of time those stuf doesnt work, creating lots more of work

johnrellis
Legend
March 2, 2025

[This post contains formatting and embedded images that don't appear in email. View the post in your Web browser.]

 

@valentinosh: "i do it to remove a face and in the place it generates new faces...lots of time those stuf doesnt work, creating lots more of work"

 

If you select a face but leave parts of the body unselected, even parts that are disconnected, Remove will generate a replacement that tries to match that body. Select all of the body along with the face. 

 

See this short article for how to remove objects more reliably:
https://www.lightroomqueen.com/generative-remove-replace/

Most complaints about Remove are addressed in the article. But if it doesn't help, please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo (not a screenshot). With nearly every one of the many dozen problem photos posted here, we've been able to show how to quickly remove the desired objects.

 

"why not put a tab , with the old options ? like cloning and stuff"

 

The older Clone, Heal, and Content-Aware modes are still available:

 

 

 

Participant
February 27, 2025

Generative Remove Failed: We're experiencing delays due to high demand. Please try again later.  I tried agian multiple times. How can I get around this? I have alot of dust spots to remove from a large timelapse sequence.

johnrellis
Legend
February 27, 2025

Use the Clone or Heal mode for dust spots -- much faster, doesn't use Adobe severs. And just as good.

C.Cella
Legend
February 27, 2025

Content Aware (renamed as Remove) is also good for spots or hot pixels.

For small stuff it works.

 

 

 

 

Christophe Galinier
Participant
February 27, 2025

Bonjour 

je trouve que sur MaC avec le dernier IOS la supression avec IA fonctionne trés bien je devais suprimer un gros camion d'un paysage 

Participant
February 26, 2025

A simple scenario in removing a black cable in front of the sky results in just replacing the black line by a white. Several update cycles could not fix the behaviour. This is very weak. If this was the first version with generative remove OK, but this is not the case anymore.

 

Lightroom 14.2.

johnrellis
Legend
February 26, 2025

[This post contains formatting and embedded images that don't appear in email. View the post in your Web browser.]

 

LR does a good job of removing the wire from your screenshot:

 

Most likely you've applied Remove on top of a Sky mask. Do Settings > Update AI Settings to recompute the Sky mask. See this short article for Adobe's recommended order in which to apply editing operations:

https://www.lightroomqueen.com/generative-remove-replace/

 

Participant
February 27, 2025

You are right, after refreshing the mask it works perfectly fine, thank you very much.

Pinner Photographer
Inspiring
February 26, 2025

The generative remove in the latest release of Lightroom is working well but the user interface 

is all over the place. I get half a box showing me the optional results that tries to display before the replace is complete. There is then some screen redrawing on the right panel and focus seems to come and go.

johnrellis
Legend
February 27, 2025

@Pinner Photographer: "the user interface is all over the place. I get half a box showing me the optional results that tries to display before the replace is complete. There is then some screen redrawing on the right panel and focus seems to come and go."

 

First troubleshooting steps:

 

1. Restart your computer.

 

2. Update your graphics driver by going directly to the manufacturer's web site:
https://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom-classic/kb/troubleshoot-gpu.html#solution-4

 

3. Reset LR's preferences:
https://www.lightroomqueen.com/articles-page/how-do-i-reset-lightrooms-preferences/


LR sometimes soils its preferences file, and resetting it can fix all sorts of wonky behavior. That article explains how to restore the old preferences if resetting doesn't help.

 

4. Do the LR menu command Help > System Info and copy/paste the entire contents here so we can see exactly which versions of hardware and software LR thinks you're running and important LR options that are set.

 

jakobv90966696
Participant
February 25, 2025

since the new update i have some issues on my Apple M2 Pro with lagging when using the healing tool.

 

also the generative fill seems to have a transparency

 

 

hope that helps to search for bugs 🙂

C.Cella
Legend
February 25, 2025

Many users speak there has been an update.
Did we really get a new Model for remove?


Because I see the same Model version for my old files and for those edited  now.

i.e

Before : 1.0.5-beta.1-1.2_1.2-8c2cea4-0.1.27.1r16.2,
Now:     1.0.5-beta.1-1.2_1.2-8c2cea4-0.1.27.1r16.2 


Some images have :  1.0.5-beta.1-1.2_1.2-8c2cea4-a6

Which rarely happened also with LrC 13

And this brings me to my complain: why is never possible to chose the Model version NOR is even mentions which one is in place?

Midjourney show the version used for the Generative Content

Adobe doens't.

We can never tell which MV was used.

We have ProcessVersion in LrC visible and selectable but not ModelVersion for Remove or even AI Masking.

The only two users here that can tell which MV is in used by each Remove Ai are @johnrellis and me.

.

 

 

Participant
February 23, 2025

In my experience, the generative removal of objects works well. However, I always have issues with objects against the sky (cranes, power lines...)

johnrellis
Legend
February 25, 2025

@Michael_Bues6754: "I always have issues with objects against the sky (cranes, power lines...)"

 

1. Uncheck Detect Objects -- it doesn't work well, especially with skinny objects and along the edges of photos. 

 

2. If you applied Remove on top of an AI mask (e.g. Sky or Subject mask), do the menu command Settings > Update AI Settings to recompute the mask.

 

3. if it doesn't help, please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo (not a screenshot). With nearly every one of the many dozen problem photos posted here, we've been able to show how to quickly remove the desired objects.