Question
PSE (24) Organizer: Management and display of Keywords and Metadata
Hello , has anyone a good understanding of the way keywords and metadata are managed in PSE Organizer ?
Here are my findings and questions:
In PSE Organizer (24) , my keywords categories are: dates, locations structured by sub categories ( I do not use the "location group" of PSE - no GPS data) and eventually multiple categories and subcategories ... Then come the PSE "persons" category (that I have organized in groups) and last, the PSE "events" group..
For a given photo, on the right hand side of the screen , all the selected tags come in the right order (i.e. like the keyword list).
However on the bottom of the screen, "events" (if any) would come first, then"people", then date , location, and , last, the other tags...
Despite a different order, nothing very disturbing. However the "people" order is surprising : rather than being sorted by "group" and alphabetic order as displayed on the right side, the names on the bottom line appear indeed by "people group" but , within the group, in "erratic" order; I suspect it could be sorted by time of creation of the person tag , but not sure ...
Now, when copying the keywords in the metadata (ctrl W) , the result is very disturbing, rendering the possibility of using them with other tools than PSE Organizer pretty unlikely...
Dates, locations, persons tags are in different order from one folder to an other ... Other types of keywords get incorporated erratically : sometimes inserted between a location subcategory and its location tag , "people" could be scattered anywhere ...
Do we know the way keywords are copied from PSE to the metadata and why the PSE sequence is not respected ?
An other finding is rather disturbing: apparently when you suppress a keyword in PSE and re-copy the metadata in the file, this keyword is not erased in the metadata!
Therefore the metadata registered in my photo files would not allow any organization process using an other program than PSE. My recent topic about "a stand alone Organizer" trigerred discussion about the benefits of copying metadata into the files... and the potential use of "Bridge".
Indeed Adobe "Bridge" can apply filter on metadata keyword but developing more sophisticated organization logics seems impossible in this current state. The only way around would be to create keywords that would contain "significant" embedded data, allowing to recognize their category despite the erratic sequence.
I would like to know if anyone has a better understanding of this subject and if this a commun problem or just something I missed .
Best regards
Alain
