Skip to main content
Inspiring
August 19, 2019
Question

PDF bookmark hierarchy is incorrect using RoboHelp 2019

  • August 19, 2019
  • 18 replies
  • 2715 views

I am generating a PDF from RoboHelp 2019. The TOC seems to correctly reflect my defined Table of Contents. However the PDF bookmark hierarchy is incorrect. It seems to be a straight listing of topics regardless of the TOC hierarchy or heading levels. This is especially problematic because the PDF defaults to opening the bookmark panel. Has anyone else seen this or have a fix for this issue?

    This topic has been closed for replies.

    18 replies

    Participant
    January 17, 2022

    @Peter Grainge Thank you! I will reach to Adobe about this. If they can solve the problem or give me an usable workaround I will reply here.

    Peter Grainge
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    January 14, 2022

    It might be worth having putting out a call to Support. See https://helpx.adobe.com/contact/enterprise-support.other.html#robohelp for your Adobe Support options. The email link tcssup@adobe.com is recommended as it reaches a team dedicated to Technical Communication Suite products including RoboHelp. 

    ________________________________________________________
    My site www.grainge.org includes many free Authoring and RoboHelp resources that may be of help.

    Use the menu (bottom right) to mark the Best Answer or Highlight particularly useful replies. Found the answer elsewhere? Share it here.
    Peter Grainge
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    January 14, 2022

    @defaultp8935bm7h02p I am assuming you are on 2019. If you have Update 14 applied then you have all the fixes. I am pretty sure it was fixed.

    ________________________________________________________
    My site www.grainge.org includes many free Authoring and RoboHelp resources that may be of help.

    Use the menu (bottom right) to mark the Best Answer or Highlight particularly useful replies. Found the answer elsewhere? Share it here.
    Participant
    January 14, 2022

    I am on RoboHelp v2019.0.14 but sadly it's not working.

     

    The TOC inside the PDF looks fine and has the correct indentation, but the "bookmark" functionality inside my pdf viewer shows all topics on the first hierarchy level.

    Legend
    January 14, 2022

    Sorry, I cannot answer that, as I am now using RH 2020, new UI. There, everything works fine.

    Participant
    January 14, 2022

    Any updates regarding the initial issue? I also have to problem, that the pdf bookmarks are in a "straight listing of topics regardless of the TOC hierarchy or heading levels".

    Legend
    September 18, 2019

    Peter, I could successfully download the .docx-file. To me, your summary describes all existing problems. Thank you for taking care of this.

    Karin

    Peter Grainge
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    September 18, 2019

    Karin

    I have created a Classic and a 2019 project as well as a Word document that explains things. I will try to attach the Word document but I am not sure I can in this forum. If it doesn't work, email me via my site and I will send you the document and the projects.

    Hopefully it covers all the issues and if it does, I will then liaise with Surbhi.

    Use the menu (bottom right) to mark the Best Answer or Highlight particularly useful replies. Found the answer elsewhere? Share it here.
    Legend
    September 18, 2019

    Good idea, Peter! 

    First, the result in Word (PDF-output fails, so I created Word documents) always is the same, with the checkbox Maintain HTML heading levels ticked and cleared (with respect to what I am talking about). However, in classic the result is as I would expect it. I created some screenshots that hopefully show what I mean:

    Image 1 (Project Manager in RH):

     

    Image 2 (TOC in RH):

     

    Image 3 (Navigation bar in Word / expected bookmark section in PDF):

     

    The checkbox Maintain HTML heading levels takes effect, if I put the "First Topic" with H1 header into Folder 1. With checkbox cleared, it will become a H2 in the output, with checkbox ticked, it will remain H1. But this is not what is causing me problems.

    I hope I could clarify everything. If not, please continue asking me. I am trying to explain the best I can 😉

    Regards
    Karin

    Peter Grainge
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    September 18, 2019

    Karin

    I think the best way forward here for all of us would be if in 2019 Classic you could set up a simple project with a few topics that need no content just different heading levels that works the way you expect. Run the Classic project with the Maintain HTML Heading Levels checkbox selected and cleared. Save the two PDFs created.

    Then upgrade it to 2019 to see what is different. I am expecting that the PDF generated in Classic without the checkbox selected will be the same as in 2019.

    If it is, that will tell Surbhi what is needed in an update.

     

    Use the menu (bottom right) to mark the Best Answer or Highlight particularly useful replies. Found the answer elsewhere? Share it here.
    Legend
    September 18, 2019

    Hi Surbhi and Peter,

    hm, I'm not quite sure if maybe I am working the wrong way. I use to structure my projects in folders for e.g. User Manual, Parameters, Procedures. For these "folders", there is no file with a H1 saying "User Manual" ..., its the folder name. They only contain the respective topics, starting with H2 or H3 or whatever.

    I agree that the folders in my Project Manager have nothing to do with the output, but folders or books in the TOC, which work in the same way, should be considered in the output. I would expect the bookmark section in PDF to work the same way as the navigation in the HTML help. There, the books / folders are considered as expected. The user should be enabled to quickly navigate through the PDF without having to jump to the TOC every time.

    I am also almost sure that the books have been considered for printed output in RH 2015 as H1 in the Word documents.

    I am open for any suggestions as to how to adjust my workflow 😉

    Regards
    Karin