Skip to main content
February 22, 2009
Question

My top ten criteria for the new forums

  • February 22, 2009
  • 125 replies
  • 10086 views
This is my view on what the new forums should provide. This is what I'll personally be measuring the new forums against when we have a fully testable beta version.

=================================================================

1 - The new forums should encourage the participation of new members, both to feel encouraged to seek help in the first place, but also to stay and become long-term contributing members of the online community here.

2 - The new forums should alienate the existing users as little as possible, as there's no point in having questions with no answers - though equally there's no point in having answers with no questions. A tricky balance to strike.

3 - Response of the forums should be no worse, and hopefully better, than typical performance here in recent months. If that means beefing up the hardware to accommodate the demands of more graphic-intensive software, so be it.

4 - The forums should look not unlike the majority of typical modern internet forums. This will not be favoured by those familiar with the sparse appearance of the present forums, but incoming new members expect to see something that looks more contemporary and familiar in style, even if there's a modest performance cost.

5 - They should function not unlike the majority of modern internet forums, in terms of the user interface and usable features. If you've got your first problem with Adobe software and you arrive in the Adobe forums for the first time, you don't want then to be confronted with something that looks like another problem and which takes time and effort to understand. The learning curve should be absolutely minimal. There should be a very low turn-away rate (potential users taking one look and backing off before participating or even complaining).

6 - The search function should be state of the art. If you have a good manual for the product software, a good user interface for it, and a good search engine for the knowledgebase and forums, the number of questions needing to be asked should be significantly lower.

7 - To support the regular participants it should be possible to list the discussions which have unread posts in any given member's selected forums, and within those discussions it should be possible to go directly to the unread content without scrolling around to find it. It should then be possible to go to the next unread post in the next unread discussion without first going backwards to the overall list.

8 - NNTP access, though a mystery to me, seems highly valued by some, and providing it does not seem to mess with what the rest of us see (setting aside the quoting problem), so let's have it.

9 - An effective mechanism to enforce the forum rules by restricting access by individuals who persistently break the rules should be provided - and there should be no simple way round it. Failing that, provision of an inbuilt method for users to ignore posts by other specified users is necessary.

10 - There should be a properly functioning list of banned words.

=================================================================

That's my top ten list of criteria - though in five minutes I'll probably think of some key stuff I have left out.

What's yours?
    This topic has been closed for replies.

    125 replies

    Known Participant
    March 17, 2009
    Louder and longer does not equal more correct or higher regard. Most people I know just consider it bitching just to hear oneself talk.

    > "Take it or leave it"

    There ARE other options.
    March 17, 2009
    Shan't!

    Take it or leave it

    8/
    Known Participant
    March 17, 2009
    "My memory of the Audition/Syntrillium take-over is that the Syntrillium users have hated everything to do with the Adobe Forums ever since they lost their own Forums?!

    So I wouldn't put too much weight on comments from that quarter!"


    Kinda sounds like you're describing your own reactions to the new forum.

    Don't get me wrong, Ann...I agree with just about all the complaints. But your pit bull harangues have put me offnot from visiting the new forumbut from listening to ANYthing you have to say about the matter.

    Give it a bloody rest, will ya please!?
    ~graffiti
    Legend
    March 12, 2009
    > I hope that not too many people considering the purchase of Adobe products ever see this klunky forum software.

    I've seen that opinion many times over the years.
    March 12, 2009
    The poster has been a member for a week or so - no obvious connection with the old Syntrillium forums - it's just an example of how some people react to the current system before they get used to it, or they walk away. Most new users don't comment either way of course.
    March 11, 2009
    My memory of the Audition/Syntrillium take-over is that the Syntrillium users have hated everything to do with the Adobe Forums ever since they lost their own Forums?!

    So I wouldn't put too much weight on comments from that quarter!

    8/
    March 11, 2009
    Alan Paprocki, "Would a video upgrade be meaningful in Audition 3.0?" #3, 11 Mar 2009 8:39 am is an unsolicited opinion from a new user of the forums on the existing system.
    Ramón G Castañeda
    Inspiring
    March 11, 2009
    Bunk. Nothing to see here but bunk.
    March 11, 2009
    The obverse to that is that such things are not "popular" (meaning actually "LIKED") at all but there is no other choice available to people.

    Or it could mean that the general standard of education and public taste is deplorable.
    Curt Wrigley
    Inspiring
    March 11, 2009
    Thats one viewpoint, or you cold consider the obvious: Things are popular because people like them.