Skip to main content
February 28, 2009
質問

The Big Picture

  • February 28, 2009
  • 返信数 234.
  • 17801 ビュー
I think what is not being understood by some participants in these discussion is the scale of change which will follow the transition to the new forums.

Have a look at http://www.jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace-community and you'll see that the purpose of the Clearspace Community software goes way beyond the objectives that might be deduced of the current forums and their underlying software.

My personal take on things is that Adobe have decided that the whole style of the user interactions and community here is no longer appropriate to their corporate needs. There was a time when provision of a support forum was not seen as much related to the main thrust of company objectives, but those days have gone. Online communities are now one of the chief means of interaction between a corporation and its customers - and it's a two way channel. Interaction between those customers is also facilitated by within the online community but that's not necessarily deemed to be the key objective.

The forthcoming change represents, sadly, the end of this community and the creation of a new and very different one. The functional elements and the look and feel of their presentation in the Jive software are carefully designed to foster a particular style of interaction between users of Adobe software, and beween the users and the company. The functions and form are designed for an over-riding purpose and to support an overarching communications philosophy, not thrown in upon a whim.

It seems very clear to me that Adobe expects that the new community will have a significantly different flavour to the old, and that they will have anticipated that not all of the present members of this (and the Macromedia) communities will feel at home in the new one. There's no need to warn Adobe that some people will be unhappy enough not to return - they will have accepted that risk at the outset.

While there will be an inevitable loss of expertise, and it will be sad to see the last of some regular participants here, it seems clear to me that Adobe are hoping that the new style of community (moulded by the software they have chosen to create it) will bring in new members who may well have considerable expertise in the products, but who have not felt encouraged to participate in the style of community we have here now. The company will also be hoping that those newly requiring support will find the new site to be more effective and simpler to use than the old, and that the site will enable the company image and the strengths and usage of the product lines to be put across more clearly.

That, as I see it, is the big picture. There's not much point in discussing the points of detail unless in the context of the overall company objectives in making these changes - and if you disagree with the whole underlying premise of the changes, then there's little chance that you'll like much of the detail either.
    このトピックへの返信は締め切られました。

    返信数 234

    PJonesCET
    Participating Frequently
    March 3, 2009
    Okay

    Phillip M Jones, CET
    Real world Dumb .... :)
    March 3, 2009
    Everybody has won and all must have prizes

    In that spirit, I hereby designate all Adobe Forum Contributors as "REAL WORLD EXPERTS" and suggest that they append this designation to all future Posts.

    Ann Shelbourne
    REAL WORLD EXPERT
    Günter_Schenk
    Inspiring
    March 3, 2009
    -------
    so are you calling Günter a liar steve?
    -------

    fortunately I didn´t forget to prefix my stuff with "from my experience" ;-)
    March 3, 2009
    so are you calling Günter a liar steve? :)

    (nevermind. i give up! :) )
    Steve Howard, ACP
    Inspiring
    March 3, 2009
    "From my experience: once you have that badge attached to your name, it´s in particular the new forum participants who may have a tendency to call you to account for matters you aren´t responsible for at all respectively which you can´t solve because they are out of your reach -- and as the Community Expert label (I reckon this could be *any* lable) appears to induce the huge misinterpretation that your posts reflect Adobe´s view"

    >> right. thanks. that's a pretty good argument for NOT allowing the "badges"...

    Well, it might be, if it were true. In 8 years in the Comminity Expert and Team Macromedia programs, I've not encountered this sort of hassle.
    March 3, 2009
    phil, i'm never serious... unless i'm not joking. :|
    PJonesCET
    Participating Frequently
    March 3, 2009
    Well actually it could be a smirk or even if said with a smiley it could be a backhanded comment. And meant to be funny to one set of people, but meant as put down to another.

    It depends upon the poster. If I am joking I use a smiley of some type or another. But if I am dead serious, then I don't use any, Or use some non standard ones such and angry or crying.

    I try to get along but have had years of abuse and constantly get more.

    When I got started on the net there were a lot of so called experts , or people thought they were better than other constantly putting people down. But then for years this went away and it was people's desire to to help other and who they were or what computer they used didn't matter. Now its coming around full circle. People are back to putting other people down, unless they use the same equipment they do. I had grown a rather thick skin. But after the net mellowed out it thinned out. Now I point it wherever I see it. I'm just getting tired of seeing it.
    Known Participant
    March 3, 2009
    Phil

    You do know that the smiley means he was joking, don't you?
    March 3, 2009
    dave: <br /> <br />Deliverd as requested: <br /> <br /> <a href="http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1qMPTetrtqRrg3nCl3SCTDtmtgSuT0" /></a> <img alt="Picture hosted by Pixentral" src="http://www.pixentral.com/hosted/1qMPTetrtqRrg3nCl3SCTDtmtgSuT0_thumb.jpg" border="0" /> <br /> <br />http://www.fotosearch.com/photos-images/digger.html <br /> <br />That should get you started
    PJonesCET
    Participating Frequently
    March 3, 2009
    > What worries me is that he apparently believes that. Who fed him that idea? Jeez. I see we still have some way to go.

    No feeding necessary! I see it day after day, year after year. It slowed down for a while. But its back with a vengeance.

    Just look at the comment even though had the smiley about mac people and living mud in the room, Just above.

    I am sorry to see it raise its ugly here in adobe forums. This was one of the last remain bastions of of unbiased help.

    Help in any forum should be based on the need for help and not have some stupid biases against what type computer one uses.

    If you don't see it on the internet, you obviously don't have your opens wide enough to see it.

    Take for instance in Mozilla support groups I was a regular poster. when some one asked a question and gave no platform used I would post a suggested answer for the Mac Users. some one would come up with one for the PC users. But then someone would say ".... off, we don't need any information from you Mac users, we didn't ask". So after years of such abuse I no longer post. There are a few Mac users they use to post that no longer do after I quit. So I see it every where. That because windows users are the largest users, they supposedly are the best users, when all they are is different.