Stock Contributors

Hello guys,I recently started contributing videos and so far I had rejections only 10%. So to my suprise these two were rejected and I'm wondering why. Maybe it was rejected because camera has slight shaking due to steps over stairs. I wanted to film exactly that, moving over the stairs yet maybe shaking over stairs is not allowed. Do I need to have smooth transition with moving or there is some other issue I'm missing? Thanks

Fixed and Resubmitted for the 3rd time and rejected again. Are they really that bad?

Hi all.   I am a new contributor and looking to learn. I recently submitted this photo and it got rejected for quality reasons.  Could anyone help me understand why it got rejected? 

Hi all, thinking it is the soft focus for the rejection...would appreciate input. 

Bonjour, pouvez vous me dire pourquoi ces photos ont été refusée (problème de qualité) j'aimerai beaucoup les améliorer. Merci beaucoup !

Buenas, No sé qué estoy haciendo mal. He enviado un model release tanto en formato digital como en físico, pero no me lo aceptan.He puesto el nombre en mayúscula y la misma fecha en todas las firmas. 

Hello! I'm new to community and learning about the content creation to stock (I have been using stock photos for years though). I have checked out the rejected content people post here and I'm wondering if there the quality criteria is always the same. For example there is thousands of images of flowers, but significantly less photos of horse archery. Does the rarity (or other commercial value) effect to approval? I have a few photos with good composition and commercial value, but just desent quality due to older gear and action nature of the cituations the pictures were taken. If the subject of the photo doesn't affect, it really explains some situations where i have tried to find suitable stock image, but failed miserably.

Have a good time. I am a new author. I want to ask why all my works are rejected, although 90%+ are accepted at other streams? None of them passed, and I know for sure that they are not bad. Moreover, after the exam, I never received a message that I was not suitable as an author. For more than a week, several works during the day have been rejected. It seems to me that this is some kind of mistake. I want a real one more review of my works for further cooperation. Very disappointing. I hope for help with my problem.   [Moderator moved the thread to the correct forum]

Hello,I'm new as acontributor and I would like to undertand what should I do better to make Adobe accept my photos.From what I read I think it could be the dof too shallow? Composition?Or something else I'm not seeing?General info:- I didn't take them with the intention of putting them on Stock - I decided to try after- I did erase some traces of visible logos- The riginal files where 60MP but here I could upload only a smaller version- I know they are not perfect 🙂Thank you for your feedback,Silene

Hello, could you please help me to understand, why this AI image was rejected? What is wrong with the quality? 

Tell me how to correctly fill in the consent of the generated AI model, otherwise the first submission was incorrect. Thank you all in advance and sorry to bother you.

Hi, I am new to Adobe Stock, I have posted some photos but most of them have been rejected. I really would like to improve, can somone offer my a constuctive criticism to get better. The first two photos were rejected because of Intelectual Property, I wonder it was becase I used the name of the hotel even when thie building is not longer  hotel and have no bran label on it. Thank you very much for your support.

Ustedes perdonen pero en esta foto no entiendo la falta de calidad, no tiene ruido esta a ISO 100, no es una composicion, y no creo que el balance de blanco este tan mal, asi que porfavor ¿donde esta el fallo?. Ultimamente veo que muchos rechazos que otras agencias no me hacen. Lo siento pero es una obsevacion sin animo de ofender. Gracias.

hello, I've been trying for 2-3 hours to manage to upload 4 pictures to the platform that are compressed to reach the required capacity, but it's not possible because the platform sees them with a larger capacity than the real one, what solution do you have for this problem, thank you for understanding, I am waiting for an answer to my problem, thank you

So I've seen tons of questions 'bout the review duration. Just wanted to inform you, that my images were reviewed today after 48 days. I hope it helps you!

Hi there, I really thought I was on to something good when I mastered the whole reflection surface shots. I suppose no one would want to buy these though, because they are too 'artsy'?  I am feeling a bit sad that none of my photos with this concept got accepted.  Does Adobe not want these because they would never sell?Here are 3 examples. Thanks for your feedback in this matter,Billie

This image was rejected with 'quality issues' as the reason. I have no idea why, can anyone please help me and tell me what is wrong with it? Thank you! 

Adobe Stock customers expect natural colored images. Nobody wants to pay for images that require color-correction. Proper White Balance helps ensure your images contain no unnatural color-shifts and will appeal to a wider base of customers.   Understand your lighting conditions. When shooting with natural light on an overcast day, your photos may have a cold (blue) color tone. Incandescent lights with typical tungsten filament create a warm (yellow/orange) color cast. Some fluorescent lights can give photos an unnatural green tint. 👽 Aim for consistent lighting.  Avoid mixing light sources which makes corrections harder.   To compensate for lighting conditions, use a gray card (available for a few dollars on Amazon or B&H). A gray card is a square piece of material specifically shaded at 18 percent gray. This tool helps you find a perfect white balance in-camera on non-RAW images. To set white balance using a gray card, take a shot with the card fill

Mi cuenta fue suspendida por problemas de validacion,  envie varios mensajes a soporte pero no contestarion.Que deberia hacer?

Shame on you Adobe Stock. I'm vector artist exclusive for Istockphoto and today I found lots of my vectors for sale here as PNG files. User is "Made By Raja"Here is one of stole images at Istock:https://www.istockphoto.com/br/vetor/old-american-caminh%C3%A3o-gm165746114-14177924And here the stolen images at "Made By Raja" portfolio. Almost all thief's portfolio consists of my vectors.https://stock.adobe.com/br/contributor/211206303/made-by-raja?load_type=author&prev_url=detail Dozens of my files in the thief's portfolio.Adobe, please do something and shutdown entire portfolio of this "artist"

Hi, I am an Adobe stock contributor. I just wanted to follow up. My designs have been pending for more than 25th days. Can someone help me out? Why haven't they been published yet?

Hello, could you please help me understand why this photo was rejected?

Por favor donde esta la falta de calidad en estas fotos?

Hi, I resently got interested in uploading my photos to Adobe Stock but I realised that the quality of my images whas pretty bad. I tried to edit one image to make the colors a bit better and then I tried AI upscaling it to see if that would make it good enough to upload. 2 days later the image got rejected for "exposure issues, soft focus, excessive filtering or artifacts/noise".I am curious to see what exactly was the problem with the photo I uploaded because frankly it can just be almost all of them. Also if there are other ways to edit/upscale my photo to make it submittable or I should just give up on the images I have taken with my phone and move on to taking pictures with better equipment [Images :(Original Photo/ Edit with Filters/Ai upscaled)]

hello sir, please remove my payoneer account. I am going to add new account again.My payoneer account is closed so i am going to add new account.Thank you.