P: Show words omitted from prompt or violates content guidelines

NIX:  I hear ya, and I feel the same.  Firefly is garbage, the way they censor/flag so many prompts...to the point of uselessness.  Adobe clearly isn't embracing the AI tech as they should...which will hurt them in the present and future.  
They'll get left back eventually.  I guess I should be fine with that, as much as Adobe has pissed me off with other things in the past, such as their subscription models and lack of addressing many bugs.  Maybe I should instead be celebrating their inevitable demise.  

"may be considered too strict for some users" lol, this waste of AI potential flages EVERYTHING; nine out of ten prompts are rejected, no matter how harmless and polite, any prompts longer than few words is rejected, i have to rephrase it and rephrase it and rephrase it like ten times before it miraculously does not flag it altho there is not a single inappropriate letter in it. It is completely and uterlly useles, what a waste, i would never pay for this service like it is, i would not use it even if it was totally free, it is that useless.

Tell users what word was "removed". This prompt shouldn't have anything that's trademarked, copyrighted, etc

"I want an image that appears to be 2 photographs side by side, of an in ear measuring thermometer. The left should read 99. 4 and the right should read 100.7. The meme styled text is "When your low grade fever graduates ". Both left and right sides of the image should be essentially the same with the main difference being the temperature"

I am sick of the monkey telling me I am using words AI won't allow. You can use "George Washington" but you can't use "Donald Trump"? 

Agreed

Instead of just flagging words, flag contextual meaning of the words. AI should be able to determine from a prompt that "shooting" in the context of a "photograph" or "bleeding" in the context of "colors" are not a problem.

@TheChunkyMonkey wrote: "Just wondering why Pepe the frog is a word that violates the guidelines? Is pepe a bad word? "

Here are the user guidelines for using Adobe Generative AI:

https://www.adobe.com/legal/licenses-terms/adobe-gen-ai-user-guidelines.html

Note Section 4:

4. Be Respectful of Third-Party Rights

Using Adobe’s generative AI features to create, upload, or share content that violates third-party copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity, or other rights is prohibited. This may include, but is not limited to, entering text prompts designed to generate copyrighted, trademarked, or otherwise infringing content, uploading an input or reference image that includes a third party’s copyrighted content, generating text that plagiarizes third-party content, or using a third party’s personal information in violation of their privacy or data protection rights. If you’re not sure whether your content violates the rights of a third party, you may want to reach out to an attorney or consult publicly available reference materials at the following:

• U.S. Copyright Office
• U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
• Lumen

Pepe the Frog is not allowed because it is copyrighted by Matt Furie, the creator.

"In June 2019, Furie received a $15,000 out of court settlement in a copyright infringement case against Infowars and Alex Jones concerning unlicensed use of the image of Pepe the Frog on far-right themed posters. Furie stated that he would continue to 'enforce his copyrights aggressively to make sure nobody else is profiting off associating Pepe the Frog with hateful imagery.' "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepe_the_Frog

Jane

Just use Dall-E save yourself the headache. Stopped using woke Firefly months ago. However you can find work arounds to get it to work. I can get firefly to generate nude women so they not as smart as they think. 

You are absolutely right. When I try text to image generative A.I., I can't
even say "sexy woman" without it being rejected. It is also hopelessly
P.C. I asked for brick layers for the 1666 London Fire restoration, and
they had one black man, one Asian woman and one white woman laying bricks.
I think they have some kind of quota system. I would like to try to have it
do a group of sperm donors and see how many women they put in....except the
word 'sperm' wouldn't get past the censors.

*Sincerely yours,*

*Steve *

*Steven W Rodgers*