Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
87

Nudity and Semi nudity using AI and its imposed restrictions.

Community Beginner ,
Feb 26, 2024 Feb 26, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hello Adobe and its collective users

I am writing to you not only as a devoted user of Adobe’s suite of creative tools but also as a professional photographer whose work has been recognized and displayed in museum settings. My specialization in classic nudes has allowed me to explore the human form in a manner that celebrates beauty, form, and artistic expression. However, I have encountered a significant challenge with the AI restrictions placed on editing images that contain nudity, even when such images are created within a professional, artistic context.

 

As an artist whose work often involves nuanced and sensitive subjects, I understand and respect the complexities of creating ethical AI tools that serve a wide user base. However, the current limitations significantly impact my creative process and professional workflow, particularly when it comes to editing backgrounds for nude or semi-nude images. These restrictions not only prolong my work but also inhibit my artistic expression, compelling me to seek alternative solutions that may not offer the same level of quality and integration as Adobe’s products.

 

I propose the consideration of the following points, which I believe could benefit both Adobe and its professional users:

 

Artistic Integrity and Professional Use: Recognition of the professional and artistic context in which tools are used can help differentiate between content that is genuinely creative and that which the restrictions aim to prevent.

 

Ethical Use Policy: An ethical use policy that accommodates professional artists and photographers, possibly through a verification process, ensuring that our work is not unduly censored while maintaining legal and ethical standards.

 

Custom Solutions for Professionals: The development of specialized software versions that allow more flexibility for editing sensitive content, with appropriate safeguards to prevent misuse.

 

Feedback and Advisory Panel: Establishing a panel of professionals from the art and photography community to provide ongoing feedback and insights on how Adobe’s tools can better serve creative professionals.

 

Transparent Guidelines: The creation of clear, transparent guidelines that navigate the legal and ethical landscape, especially regarding sensitive content, to ensure users can understand and comply with Adobe’s policies.

 

I am fully committed to engaging in a constructive dialogue and am willing to be part of a solution that respects both the creative needs of artists and the ethical considerations of digital content. I believe that by working together, we can find a balanced approach that supports artistic expression while adhering to shared values and responsibilities.

 

Thank you for considering my perspective on this matter. I am hopeful for an opportunity to discuss this further and explore how we can make Adobe’s tools even more inclusive and accommodating for professional artists and photographers.    Steven Williams 

Idea No status

Views

74.5K
Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 2 Correct answers

Community Expert , Jun 12, 2024 Jun 12, 2024

@Dalvidos Similar requests have been made and each time users are referred back to the terms of use outlined by Adobe.

https://www.adobe.com/legal/licenses-terms/adobe-gen-ai-user-guidelines.html

 

Votes

Translate
Community Expert , Jun 04, 2024 Jun 04, 2024

Adobe is widely used in educational and business settings. They've made a choice to prevent misuse/abuse and train on licensed models to prevent liability.

If you are working with nudity - there are ways around existing models in Photoshop -

  1. Duplicate the layer. Hide the original Layer.
  2. Paint over the "offensive" areas covering up any triggered items. 
  3. Select and generate.
  4. Turn off the painted layer once you have your generation.

If you are trying to generate nudity - you're better off looking

...

Votes

Translate
replies 274 Replies 274
265 Comments
New Here ,
Nov 11, 2023 Nov 11, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

So I have this problem - I did pregnancy photoshoot for my client and I would like to extend the white background, the problem is that I cannot use generative fill because the women is naked.All the intimate areas are covered but I still cannot use the generative fill. Is there anyway to go around this restriction or maybe there will be an update that separates extremely nude photography from actual pregnancy shoots? 

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Nov 11, 2023 Nov 11, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

If it's a simple background, one thought  is the Crop Tool using Content Aware Fill option.. Just input the Aspect Ratio and if you have a batch of images, make it a Crop Preset.

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
New Here ,
Nov 11, 2023 Nov 11, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

That's one option but the problem is that my white background is not smooth enough and there are some spots that light was just "ugly" 😅. So I use it to create "new" white background as well, and of course it's way faster then doing content aware fill. And when I used this option it's failed anyway giving me the message that I have not enough ram spece to use this feature which is just ridiculous with 16gb 

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Nov 11, 2023 Nov 11, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Off the top of my head...

 

Work on a copy.

 

Select subject, expand selection slightly. 

Cotent aware fill to remove the subject. Now there is no person.

 

Extend the image using generative fill or whatever A.I. features you like.

 

Drop the original image back into the extended image, masking as needed..

 

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Nov 11, 2023 Nov 11, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

 

quote

the problem is that I cannot use generative fill because the women is naked.

By @ms58149619

 

 

 

See guideline number 2 for Generative AI useage and find a way that does not break the guidelines.

2. Be Respectful and Safe

Do not use Adobe’s generative AI features to attempt to create, upload, or share abusive, illegal, or confidential content. This includes, but is not limited to, the following:

  • Pornographic material or explicit nudity

https://www.adobe.com/legal/licenses-terms/adobe-gen-ai-user-guidelines.html

 

We cannot offer advice to break the guidelines on the Adobe forums.

 

Jane

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Nov 11, 2023 Nov 11, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Can you use Remove Background, and set her against a rebuilt background?  We used manage this stuff just fine before we had Gen Fill.

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Participant ,
Dec 30, 2023 Dec 30, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

QINGCHARLES_0-1704003665984.png

I work on photos of professional models and often use AI features like generative fill to try and remove things left in the backgrounds of shoots, or wall electrical outlets etc that are ugly and distracting.

 

The problem is that Adobe products are made by very prude and conservative American developers for whom a bikini or a n*pple slip is a scandal. (Adobe won't let me write the scientific term for the milk gland of a mammal)

 

Sometimes I can get around it by cropping the image to take the model out, fix the issue I need and then paste the area back in, but obviously this doubles the time it takes me to edit an image. And often, it just won't do it. That box today was caused simply by having the face of a Playb*y model in the image (nothing below her shoulders).

QINGCHARLES_0-1704004170355.png

 

Can you get a discount from your subscription because the features don't operate?

 

Has anyone tried to generative fill in Luminar Neo? Does it have any of the same issues? I need a replacement product.

 

p.s. Generative Fill is fine with murder scenes, just not bare shoulders on women. Bare shoulders on men is fine. T*pless men are fine. (but the word itself is banned by Adobe) Why is this product so sexist? Is there a tort suit available if a company makes a product that so blatently violates the rights of one particular subset of the population?

QINGCHARLES_0-1704004132634.png

 

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
New Here ,
Jan 24, 2024 Jan 24, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Why are images censored? Is it a setting I'm unaware of? And what exactly is forbidden? Because I've had it censor pics that could not possibly be in violation. 

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
New Here ,
Jan 25, 2024 Jan 25, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Agreed. I'm using the full version now, but still I cannot generate a cowboy holding a smoking gun. "Smoking" and "gun" are screened. Colt 45, screened. Looking for other AI because Adobe Firefly is censor happy. I understand that Adobe doesn't want to be held liable for assisting in creating inflammatory imagery. However, my client needs something specific, and if Adobe cannot deliver, why pay such a high price? It's like buying a power drill that yells at you when you go to use it.

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Jan 25, 2024 Jan 25, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Here are Adobe's Generative AI Guidelines:

 

You might check section 2 to see if your prompts fell into any of those categories.

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
New Here ,
Feb 14, 2024 Feb 14, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

We as the creators should decide what we should create, and their shouldn't be filters telling us what is and is not appropriate, vote to require a setting to be activated for the filter to be on, and we should choose whether to have it on or not.

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
New Here ,
Feb 15, 2024 Feb 15, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I am trying to use generative AI on pictures containing nudity (covered nudity), not eroting in nature etc. only to expand background, why cannot I do this?

 

As I understand, adobe rules is as follows:

Do not use Adobe’s generative AI features to attempt to create, upload, or share abusive, or illegal, or content that violates the rights of others. This includes, but is not limited to, the following:

  • Pornographic material or explicit nudity

And I am trying to do none of those things. Why is adobe assuming I am trying to create or upload abusive material just because it contains naked skin (not even exposed nudity)? I am not even trying to alter the person in the photo in any way but only to expand the damn background. The photo taken during photoshoot on mututally agreed terms.

So effectively we cannot use generative fill as long as adobe detects any kind of exposed skin present on the photo?

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Feb 15, 2024 Feb 15, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Ai is under intense scrutiny and getting bad press from media and governments, so Adobe are being careful not to be seen promoting the misuse of Ai generated images.  

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
Feb 15, 2024 Feb 15, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I understand where Adobe stands on this issue but hopefully, they will at some point loosen this up at some point. 

RV

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Feb 16, 2024 Feb 16, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

quote

So effectively we cannot use generative fill as long as adobe detects any kind of exposed skin present on the photo?

If you just want to extend background just make a duplicate, paint over the part that’s probably the trigger of the issue and expand away.

Then duplicate the result to the original image and mask it. 

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
New Here ,
Feb 23, 2024 Feb 23, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

As a dedicated wedding and boudoir photographer, I greatly appreciate the innovative features that Photoshop offers, particularly the AI functionality. It has been an invaluable tool in my workflow, allowing me to efficiently remove unwanted items from the background of my images, thus enhancing the overall aesthetic and ensuring a seamless final product for my clients.

 

However, I keep encountering a significant limitation with the AI feature that has hindered its usability in my line of work and I am really frustrated. It has come to my attention that the current guidelines restrict the use of AI when processing images containing women's bodies in lingerie. According to these guidelines, AI will not generate any edits in such cases, effectively rendering the feature unusable for a significant portion of my photographic work.

 

While I understand the importance of responsible usage guidelines, I believe that the current restrictions are unnecessarily limiting and fail to account for the diverse needs of photographers working in various genres and styles. Boudoir photography, like any other form of art, deserves to benefit from the technological advancements that software such as Photoshop offers, without arbitrary constraints that inhibit its creative potential.

 

What are you guys going to do to fix this?

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Feb 25, 2024 Feb 25, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Feature Requests (Idea) and Bug Reports are registered at Adobe, otherwise this is essentially a user Forum, though thankfully some Adobe employees do occasionally chime in.

So you are not talking to Adobe, but other Photoshop users. 

 

Feel free to post a Feature Request, but please do a search first and if one that reflects your wishes already exists add your support to that. 

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Feb 25, 2024 Feb 25, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

As a work-around you can try blacking out the »offending« content on an additional Layer, work atop that and remove it when the background-edits are done. 

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Feb 27, 2024 Feb 27, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

For Feature Requests (»Idea«) and Bug Reports this Forum is the correct path to address the Photoshop team/Adobe, otherwise this is essentially a user Forum (though thankfully some Adobe employees do occasionally chime in).

But if you want to make sure your concerns register at Adobe please post a Feature Request.

Even then feedback by Adobe personnel is not guaranteed. 

 

If this strictly concerns the backgrounds you could, as a work-around, add a black-out-layer and work atop that, then remove/hide that layer afterwards. 

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
Feb 29, 2024 Feb 29, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thank you C.pfaffenbichler . Please direct me to the correct dept. Where is the Feature Request located? I appreciate your work-around. 

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Explorer ,
Apr 05, 2024 Apr 05, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hello Adobe Team and Fellow Creatives,

I'm reaching out today to spark a conversation about an issue that touches the core of our creative process using Adobe Photoshop: the censorship implemented in the generative fill feature. This isn't just about the restrictions we face; it's about the fundamental principles of artistic freedom and responsibility.

Art, in its most profound form, allows us to explore the depths of human experience, pushing boundaries and challenging perceptions. However, the current censorship on generative fill curtails this exploration, imposing limits that are not only unnecessary but also counterproductive to the ethos of creative expression.

Responsibility for the art we create lies with us, the artists. It's essential that Adobe recognizes this, ensuring that tools like Photoshop serve to extend our capabilities, not constrain them. The censorship of content, such as the depiction of scars from battles or surgeries, restricts our ability to tell stories that are meaningful and impactful. Art should confront, console, and celebrate life in all its complexity, and for that, artists need the freedom to depict reality as it is, or imagine it as it could be.

Moreover, the nuances of human form and condition, including aspects like nudity, are foundational to various art forms. The current restrictions hinder not just the creation of art but also the representation of the human experience in its authenticity.

While the intention behind implementing an appeals process is appreciated, it doesn't address the root issue. The process is a workaround, not a solution, and it introduces unnecessary barriers to creativity and expression.

In closing, I urge the Adobe team to reconsider the censorship policies associated with the generative fill feature. Let's empower artists with the freedom to create responsibly, without undue censorship. Adobe has always been at the forefront of creative technologies, and this is an opportunity to lead by example, championing artistic freedom and integrity.

Looking forward to a constructive dialogue and hopeful for a resolution that aligns with the values of our creative community.

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Apr 06, 2024 Apr 06, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

quote

I'm reaching out today to spark a conversation about an issue that touches the core of our creative process using Adobe Photoshop: the censorship implemented in the generative fill feature. This isn't just about the restrictions we face; it's about the fundamental principles of artistic freedom and responsibility.

@ujokasjdflkjawkfjasdf , it seems you might be confusing »AI-based image generation« and »art«. 

A certain AI implementation not readily creating the imagery one wants does not hinder one in creating that imagery as artists have done pre-2023 (or thereabouts) and one can draw, paint, photograph, search stock images, create 3D-models, … just as before or use non-Adobe AI-based image creating applications. 

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Apr 06, 2024 Apr 06, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

" it seems you might be confusing »AI-based image generation« and »art«. "

 

Ah, yes, I love that 🙂 Couldn't have said it better myself.

 

I'm still convinced AI is what's going to bring it all down eventually. We've been flying higher and higher, but this time we flew too close to the sun. And with that said 😉

 

This isn't Adobe's fault. They had to get on board. And I have no problem accepting that AI can be a useful tool for some purposes. But the emphasis is on tool. There's a lot of creative's and artistic's in this post, and that instantly raises a flag with me.

 

OK, this is just my opinion. But if we're going to discuss, this is what we should be discussing. Not some technicality in the implementation.

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Apr 06, 2024 Apr 06, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I think I read last year that some AI model achieved a reliable prognosis of protein folding (deducing the spatial structure of a protein based on the sequence of amino acids), something that had eluded biochemists and/or the other scientists concerned with protein-creation and -properties for ages. 

So as far as I am concerned AI has proven to be good for something. 

 

But I would not be surprised about people making terrible choices about how to utilize it otherweise … 

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Apr 06, 2024 Apr 06, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Yeah, that's my point. There are good uses. But as we all know, the road to hll is paved with good intentions.

 

What worries me is the way it undermines the basic concept of authenticity, in a totally unprecedented way. People compare it to the invention of photography, but that doesn't hold at all. AI is a whole new category, never before seen in history. "Authentic" is by definition a premise for "creative" and "artistic". That's the whole foundation of our conception of art. So that raises the interesting question: how can AI be, or be made, authentic?

 

This is a deep rabbit hole.

 

I'm waiting for artists to put this to a serious test. If Marcel Duchamp was alive today, I'm sure he'd get right on it. So far it doesn't seem anyone has taken it on, but it's probably just a matter of time. What we can be sure of, is that it will involve a lot more than just typing in a prompt in a text box.

 

In the meantime, by all means, have fun with generative fill and firefly. But I think nudity is the least of our problems.

Votes

Translate

Report

Report