Skip to main content
Participating Frequently
November 18, 2024
Answered

Unacceptable Device Limit Change Without Notice

  • November 18, 2024
  • 3 replies
  • 6408 views

I am writing to address Adobe’s recent policy change regarding the Creative Cloud individual subscription, which now limits access to a single device at a time. This change is disruptive, deceptive, and blatantly exploitative.

What Happened

From Adobe’s chat support:

“After the update, the individual subscription can only be used on a single device at a time. Individual subscription is for personal use for the users. To access the subscription on multiple devices at the same time, we have Teams subscriptions.”

For years, individual subscriptions allowed users to work on up to two devices simultaneously—a feature many of us relied on for our workflows. This update removes that ability, with no prior warning, and pushes users toward the more expensive Teams subscription.


Why This Change is Unacceptable

  1. Contradicts Adobe’s Past Policies
    Adobe has long marketed individual subscriptions with the ability to install and work on two devices simultaneously. Here’s a quote from previous policy documentation:

    • “An individual Creative Cloud license allows you to install applications on two computers, enabling you to work seamlessly across devices.”

    Suddenly removing this functionality is unfair and feels like a bait-and-switch tactic.

  2. Disrupts Professional Workflows

    • As a solo creator, I rely on multiple devices. My desktop is used for heavy editing work, and my laptop is for travel or presenting to clients.
    • Adobe’s new limitation forces me to constantly sign in and out of devices, interrupting projects and wasting valuable time.
  3. Unjustified Upselling to Teams Plans

    • Adobe suggests that users upgrade to a Teams subscription to regain multi-device access. However, Teams starts at $84.99/month, compared to $54.99/month for an individual plan—a 55% price increase for features I don’t need as a solo user.
    • This feels like a revenue-driven decision to exploit individuals who don’t need the advanced features of a Teams subscription.
  4. Competitors Offer Better Licensing Models

    • Other creative software companies prioritize flexibility:
      • Affinity: Lifetime license with no device limitations for a one-time fee.
      • DaVinci Resolve: Multi-device support with no forced subscription model.
    • Adobe’s device restriction is an outlier in the industry and alienates its loyal customers.
  5. No Advance Notice Given

    • This major change was rolled out without warning. There was no prior communication, leaving users blindsided during ongoing projects.
    • Customers deserve better transparency from a company they’ve supported for years.

What Adobe Must Do

  1. Revert the Policy: Restore the ability for individual subscriptions to work on two devices simultaneously, as was previously the case.
  2. Introduce Fair Alternatives: Provide an affordable middle-ground subscription for individuals who work across multiple devices, without forcing them into Teams plans.
  3. Commit to Transparency: Notify users of major policy changes in advance—at least 60 days—so we can plan accordingly.

Final Thoughts

This update demonstrates a lack of consideration for Adobe’s user base, particularly solo creators and small businesses who rely on flexible device access to stay productive. If Adobe continues down this path, it will push loyal users to explore alternatives that prioritize customer needs.

 

Please address this issue promptly, as trust once broken is difficult to rebuild.

  • Brandon
Correct answer Jeff Arola

 

MrDarkThorn,

 

That is simply not true at all.

 

Individual Creative Cloud subscribers are allowed to install Creative Cloud applications on as many devices as desired, but may only have two activated (signed into) at the same time and not use both at the same time.

 

The policy of not using your two signed in devices at the same time has been the norm since the Creative Cloud was introduced around 2013.

3 replies

New Participant
January 21, 2025

I agree 100%

vycanismajoris
Inspiring
December 25, 2024

Just adding to the chorus of complaints. Two device limitation in 2024 is insufficient for what we pay per month. 

Dave Creamer of IDEAS
Adobe Expert
December 25, 2024

If the license is for the same user for all activations, how many computers can you use at once?

 

David Creamer: Community Expert (ACI and ACE 1995-2023)
kglad
Adobe Expert
December 25, 2024

@Dave Creamer of IDEAS 

 

the issue for some users is the hassle of signing out and in, especially when using a computer that's not internet connected at the time of attempted use.

Participating Frequently
November 18, 2024

After reviewing the terms shared by Adobe support, several issues become apparent:

  1. No Mention of Device Limitations
    Nowhere in Adobe’s official subscription terms is it stated that individual subscriptions are restricted to a single device at a time. Historically, individual subscriptions were advertised and supported for use on up to two devices simultaneously.

    Removing this functionality without notice is a direct deviation from what users subscribed to. This absence of clarity in the terms fails to justify the current enforcement of the single-device policy.

  2. Failure to Communicate Material Changes
    The subscription terms primarily address billing, renewals, and cancellations, but they do not empower Adobe to quietly remove core product functionality. A change like this—significantly impacting how customers use the software—should have been disclosed proactively to all subscribers.

  3. Implied Breach of Agreement
    Adobe has always emphasized its reliability and innovation. However, the failure to notify customers about removing multi-device support, a feature many of us depend on for our workflows, feels like a bait-and-switch tactic. The current terms do not clearly support such a drastic reduction in functionality.

  4. Entrapment Through Cancellation Fees
    For users dissatisfied with this policy, the cancellation terms make it difficult to leave the platform without financial loss. According to Adobe’s terms:

    • Canceling after the 14-day period results in a charge of 50% of the remaining contract obligation.

    Customers locked into a year-long contract under the promise of multi-device usage are now trapped, paying for a service that no longer meets their needs.


Adobe Must Address These Issues

  1. Device Limitation Must Be Explicit in Terms
    If Adobe intends to enforce single-device usage for individual subscriptions, it must clearly state this in its subscription terms and notify all users directly. The absence of this information makes the enforcement unjustifiable.

  2. Restore Transparency
    Adobe needs to inform its customer base immediately about such significant policy updates. Transparency is essential to maintaining trust, and changes that impact functionality should always be communicated with adequate notice—typically at least 60 days.

  3. Reinstate Multi-Device Access
    Multi-device usage was a foundational feature of individual subscriptions. For Adobe to retain its credibility, this functionality should be restored. If this is no longer possible, Adobe must offer an affordable alternative for solo creators who rely on multiple devices.

kglad
Adobe Expert
November 19, 2024

i see no change in adobe policy.  i have apps open now in two computers.

 

 

Participating Frequently
November 19, 2024

kglad,

It seems like you didn’t fully read or understand my comments before replying. I am not saying that Adobe has never allowed apps on two devices—I know very well that two devices can be signed in. My issue is with the restriction preventing me from using both devices at the same time, which I have done successfully for years.

If there is supposedly 'no change' in Adobe policy, then why am I suddenly unable to do what I have done for a long time—namely, run Creative Cloud apps on multiple devices concurrently? I provided clear examples of my work setup, and these limitations are newly enforced for me.

Jumping to the conclusion that I’m mistaken or lying is dismissive and unhelpful. I expect community experts to consider customer experiences carefully before making such implications. If you have any constructive suggestions or a way to help resolve the discrepancy between policy and user experience, I would welcome that.