Skip to main content
vinny38
vinny38
Legend
November 13, 2018
Question

Rectangle frame tool vs Rectangle tool

  • November 13, 2018
  • 1 reply
  • 15261 views

Hi Community

A discussion has started on the French forum based on "why on earth are there two separate tools in the toolbar: Rectangle tool and Rectangle frame tool?"
Since we can assign what we want to one or the other, what can justify this "duplicate"?

Therefore, my question is:
Do you see any interest in having these two separate tools in the tool panel?
If so, can you explain in which specific cases do you prefer to use a particular tool?

Vinny

    This topic has been closed for replies.

    1 reply

    amaarora
    Community Manager
    amaaroraCommunity Manager
    Community Manager
    November 13, 2018

    Hi,

    Rectangle Frame tool- With content as Graphic, has a Basic Graphic Frame style applied

    Rectangle Tool-With content Unassigned has a [None] style

    Personally, i would create rectangle for backgrounds, fills etc. Clicking inside a rectangle does not select it vs clicking inside a rectangle frame

    Rectangle frame can be preferred for holding images (or act as image placeholders because of its appearance) since it can hold an image when a place cursor is hovered over it.

    By default, frames with rectangle tool have a stroke applied.

    -Aman

    vinny38
    vinny38Author
    Legend
    November 13, 2018

    Steve Werner​ Why did you mark Aman's answer as correct?

    Sorry but no...

    Let me rephrase my question:

    "What major differences between Rectangle tool and Rectangle frame tool justify their presence in the Tools panel as two distinctive tools?"

    So far, no good answer to this question, sorry again.

    Vinny

      vinny38
      vinny38Author
      Legend
      November 13, 2018

      We choose to disagree. I think Amaarora gave several reasons. It's also historical because QuarkXPress largely did it that way. You can recognize a placeholder rectangle for graphics by the X across the frame.

      I'll also add that there is no good reason to change the way people are used to. InDesign does not have a surplus of tools (look at Illustrator or Photoshop by comparison!). I don't think things should be changed unless there's a good reason. This makes it easier for long-time users.


      Steve,

      Nothing wrong with disagreements, they're part of the debate.

      Although I'd wish I could choose which answer is correct or not by myself .

      As a matter of fact, it looks that there will be no good one whatsoever.

      This thread is a debate more than a question really.

      You said "there is no good reason to change the way people are used to".

      I find this interesting, because I personally almost never use the Rectangle tool. I wouldn't miss it really.

      Maybe a good reason would be "because it's useless"?

        Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
        Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices