Skip to main content
Participating Frequently
April 20, 2023
Question

Export - Image Sizing. Add a check box for (Lock Aspect Ratio).

  • April 20, 2023
  • 3 replies
  • 3135 views

When I export I want the image size to be absolute Width and Height, thus changing the aspect ratio.

Export doesn't do this what it does is resize to fit within the Width and Hight you specify but not change the aspect ratio.

This isn't immediately apparent until you examine the exported file.

A simple checkbox under Image Sizing titled (Lock Aspect Ratio) would immediately make this existing behaviour clear and give users the option to export a precise size image.

3 replies

Bob Somrak
Legend
April 21, 2023

You CAN use the Transform tools while you have the Crop Tool open.  You can set the aspect ratio in crop to what you set it in export and use Transform to fill the crop window.  This has limits.  I agree with others that this would be a waste of engineering time for the few that would want to stretch/compress their photos to do this when there are a lot more widely useful things for Adobe to work on.

M4 Pro Mac Mini. 48GB
Rikk Flohr_Photography
Community Manager
Community Manager
April 20, 2023

"When I export I want the image size to be absolute Width and Height, thus changing the aspect ratio."

Aspect Ratio is controlled by the Crop Tool - not the Export dialog.  Export controls - among other things size and above all preserves Aspect Ratio. 

Rikk Flohr: Adobe Photography Org
Participating Frequently
April 21, 2023

I am not wanting to crop but the image stretched to fit an absolute size.

Participating Frequently
April 21, 2023

I agree that to stretch an image to suit an output, would not be within the general spirit of LrClassic. But to crop an image suitably on the fly for output would be. And that would permit outputting the same image to multiple aspect ratios without needing to generate virtual copies and crop those, or alternatively, without turning to the Print module which already can do this, but which carries some undesirable consequences.

 

Perhaps a toggle-switch.

 

When resizing is ON, choices for this switch would be "fit within" / "crop to shape". With the former, all current behaviour would continue. With the latter, an on-the-fly crop override could happen which reduces the image (centred) according to whatever aspect ratio is implicit in the requested width and height. This option should therefore become unavailable whenever "Shorter Edge" / "Longer Edge" / "Megapixels" sizing was selected.

 

Or perhaps as a refinement, when this was active, one could choose either to state Width AND Height, or else to state Longer AND Shorter edge.

 

When resizing is OFF, this toggle should instead choose between "entire crop" (current behaviour, all  sizing options except Resolution greyed out) and "crop extract". The latter new mode would allow defining a width and height extract boundary in pixels, which the image would be cropped to directly on the fly (centred in current crop), and this would be what was exported. If such an extract crop ever strayed outside the image boundary, the overflow area should still be included - as white pixels.

 

Ease of outputting a certain-sized 1:1 extract has been often requested here. As has, the ability to in effect maintain different aspect ratio versions of the same image but without needing to repeat all processing across multiple image versions.

 

I feel that something like the above suggestions could satisfy many use-cases efficiently, and without offending any good-practice principles.


Thanks for the support. Surely I can't be the only person that would like the exact size of exported images.

Bob Somrak
Legend
April 20, 2023

That is the correct behavior.  You have to crop the image to the correct aspect ratio and then export so it fits inside the export dimensions.  Otherwise, Lightroom would have to stretch the image to fit the dimensions.

M4 Pro Mac Mini. 48GB
Participating Frequently
April 21, 2023

I'm not reporting a bug but asking for a simple change that-

  1. Makes the existing functionality more intuitive.
  2.  Adds an additional feature.

Yes, I do want the additional functionality to have the image stretched to the requested Width and Hight. (Cropping does not achieve this.)

Legend
April 21, 2023
quote

I'm not reporting a bug but asking for a simple change that-

  1. Makes the existing functionality more intuitive.
  2.  Adds an additional feature.

Yes, I do want the additional functionality to have the image stretched to the requested Width and Hight. (Cropping does not achieve this.)


By @Andrew28806889byhd

 

I find Lightroom Classic quite intuitive on this matter. Nevertheless, you can request a new feature, but speaking for myself only, I doubt this will ever be implemented. Lightroom Classic is working properly and intuitively right now, and furthermore, when dealing with photos, the idea to have the image stretched in not within the Lightroom Classic paradigm as I understand it (and you can always stretch photos using Photoshop).