P: Generative Remove Feedback (Lr Classic & Lr Eco)

Whenever I upload a grainy raw photo, if I use generative remove on a certain part, it makes that one area clearer and less grainy than the rest of the image.

By @Avery_Dyer5725

That is alas a fatal flaw of the Generative Fill and Generative Remove (even in Photoshop)

What you can do is apply Grain via Masking either ONLY on the Removed area OR on the entire image (use a Full Luma Range)

Applying grain Globally works but above Amount 30 it adds uncontrollable blur, which is absent via masking.

.

@Wania_Sarwar1611: "My AI mask always ask me to update even when i export them. The generative remove tool does work but when i jump to the next picture and come back on the same picture it say i need to update that tool."

Try these troubleshooting steps:

https://community.adobe.com/t5/lightroom-classic-discussions/p-generative-remove-feedback-lr-classic-amp-lr-eco/m-p/15240454#M400681

[This post contains formatting and embedded images that don't appear in email. View the post in your Web browser.]

@Carlie26372870bwcy: "My generative AI seems to be adding items (random buttons, baby doll heads) NOTHING to do with the image."

Remove does a good job  with your screenshot:

To use Remove more effectively:

1. Uncheck Detect Objects before brushing a selection -- it doesn't work well, especially with skinny objects and along the edges of photos.

2. See this short article for how to remove objects more reliably:
https://www.lightroomqueen.com/generative-remove-replace/

3. Most complaints about Remove are addressed in the article. But if it doesn't help, please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo (not a screenshot). With nearly every one of the many dozen problem photos posted here, we've been able to show how to quickly remove the desired objects.

There has been no change in Generative Remove since it graduated from "technology preview" in LR 14.0. LR 14.0 did enable the option Detect Objects by default, which doesn't work well, especially with skinny objects and objects near the edges of photos -- keep it unchecked. 

If this doesn't help, please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo (not a screenshot). With nearly every one of the many dozen problem photos posted here, we've been able to show how to quickly remove the desired objects.

I much prefer the old version. I dislike this upgrade very much

By @crystal_allan0231

There has been no upgrade.

If you find that Generative Remove is NOT giving you the results you want then you best chance is to file a bug report and attach some sample images.

1. .

Adobe can collect them and train the MachineLearning to do better.

Or you can share examples here.

@CaroleSD: "But I still cannot remove electrical or telephone wires effectively yet."

Uncheck Detect Objects before brushing a selection -- it doesn't work well, especially with skinny objects and along the edges of photos. Select a margin around both sides of the wire.

Make sure you select all the wires that are touching each other, and select all of the wire even if it is partially obscured by other objects.

If this doesn't help, please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo (not a screenshot). With nearly every one of the many dozen problem photos posted here, we've been able to show how to quickly remove the desired objects.

@RM Photography the model was not changed.

The issues you see now always existed.

@johnrellis has detailed several methods to improve the chances of success when using Genrative Remove.

Check his posts in this thread.

[This post contains formatting and embedded images that don't appear in email. View the post in your Web browser.]

@defaultt4hs2n2vd37h: "Generative remove failed. We encountered an issue with your results. Please view our guidelines and try again"

Right, that unhelpful error message is issued in response to trying to apply Generative Remove to a photo that the Firefly service (underlying Generative Remove) thinks violates Adobe's "guidelines".  You can find those guidelines (restrictions) by clicking on the tiny ? button:

Lots of people have complained here that Generative Remove has too many false positives while identifying images that don't comport with the guidelines. Adobe, like the other major AI providers, is scared of the political fallout that would occur if their platforms were used for pornography (especially child pornography) and other "socially harmful" purposes. So they tune their automatic detection algorithms conservatively, erring on the side of too many false positives.

I have a plugin that uses Google Gemini to analyze images, and Gemini also has way too many false positives for pornagraphy. 

[This post contains formatting and embedded images that don't appear in email. View the post in your Web browser.]

@kenjowen: "really,  really, awful for stars, milky way and aurora replacemnet when i just attempted to remove a power line"

Please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo (not a screenshot). With nearly every one of the many dozen problem photos posted here, we've been able to show how to quickly remove the desired objects.

I found this extreme example photo via Google, and Remove did a decent job of removing the power lines and the tower:

@brienr2018: "I tried to remove a person and both set of AI did absolutely nothing."

1. Uncheck Detect Objects -- it doesn't work well, especially with skinny objects and along the edges of photos.

2. See this short article for how to remove objects more reliably:
https://www.lightroomqueen.com/generative-remove-replace/

Most complaints about Remove are addressed in the article. But if it doesn't help, please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo (not a screenshot). With nearly every one of the many dozen problem photos posted here, we've been able to show how to quickly remove the desired objects.