sRGB vs Adobe RGB camera setting (when using LR editing software)?
Hi guys,
sRGB vs Adobe RGB camera setting (when using LR editing software)?
What do you think? Thanks a lot.
Hi guys,
sRGB vs Adobe RGB camera setting (when using LR editing software)?
What do you think? Thanks a lot.
Yes, with Raw there is no issue so far as processing the images, of setting AdobeRGB or sRGB in camera.
With AdobeRGB: the first character of filenames tends to change to an underscore - this is according to digital camera industry standards for JPG (the same filename pattern is then also used for camera Raw even if no camera JPG is being saved).
Also, some people have concluded that by setting AdobeRGB mode, the in camera histograms may be more indicative of the practical headroom you'll experience in Raw conversion. But some people are very full of theories of all kinds, this factor probably is not significant in practice, IMO.
[edit: meaning more precisely, the difference between sRGB or AdobeRGB is too little to change the representativeness or otherwise, of the in camera histogram]
Also, some people have concluded that by setting AdobeRGB mode, the in camera histograms may be more indicative of the practical headroom you'll experience in Raw conversion. But some people are very full of theories of all kinds, this factor probably is not significant in practice, IMO.
By @richardplondon
With sensors today capable of 14 bit dynamic range between saturation/noise floor, a gamma encoded RGB file will show clipping long before the sensor data.
In other words, neither an sRGB histogram nor an Adobe RGB histogram is a true indicator of the raw data available. Both should be treated as very rough guides.
I have absolutely no idea what any of my current cameras are set to, I've never even bothered to look.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.