Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
305

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

Community Beginner ,
May 23, 2023 May 23, 2023

Bunny.png

image (1).png

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

Bug Started Locked
TOPICS
Desktop-macOS , Desktop-Windows
292.9K
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Adobe Employee , Nov 10, 2023 Nov 10, 2023

Dear Community,

On November 7th, 2023, the Firefly for Photoshop service was updated and improved for this issue. You should encounter fewer guideline errors when working on or near skin-tone areas that do not violate the community guidelines.

While the improvement is a big step in the right direction, we are continuing to explore new ways to minimize false-positives. Please continue to give us feedback on this new forum thread and also report false violation errors in the application.
Thank you

...
Translate
replies 1389 Replies 1389
1,375 Comments
Engaged ,
Jul 24, 2023 Jul 24, 2023
Try entering a single period in the dialog box, then hitting enter
That is the workaround I'm using now.
Translate
Report
New Here ,
Jul 24, 2023 Jul 24, 2023

I work for a Tan Make Up company that uses bikini photos all the time. I can't use photoshop's AI capabilities to improove their product photos. I think Adobe should fix this. 

Translate
Report
Community Expert ,
Jul 24, 2023 Jul 24, 2023

 

 

@angelocollabs wrote

I can't use photoshop's AI capabilities to improove their product photos.

 

 

While Generative Fill is in beta, it cannot be used for commercial use.

 

Jane

 

Translate
Report
New Here ,
Jul 25, 2023 Jul 25, 2023

Trying to fix half visible flower, getting "AI Generated images were removed because they violate user guidelines"?

Translate
Report
New Here ,
Jul 25, 2023 Jul 25, 2023

Hi, I'm trying to add generative fill to the whitespace on this picture, and I keep getting the userguidelines violation message.

Translate
Report
Explorer ,
Jul 25, 2023 Jul 25, 2023

I was having the same issue. I saw a video by PixImperfect that said instead of leaving the prompt field blank, type a period (.) before hitting Generate. It hasn't failed since.

 

Hope that helps.

Translate
Report
Engaged ,
Jul 25, 2023 Jul 25, 2023

Try adding the period ( or full stop ). That little workaround helps for most generations.

Translate
Report
New Here ,
Jul 25, 2023 Jul 25, 2023

using a period (".") worked, i hope Adobe team figures this out 

Translate
Report
Community Expert ,
Jul 25, 2023 Jul 25, 2023

@Sebastian292242075jds thats the point of participating in a beta test - help the team improve the product.

Translate
Report
Community Expert ,
Jul 25, 2023 Jul 25, 2023

I've tried it using any number of non-alphabetical characters (#, ^, ), etc.) and they all fix the same issue as using a period. Since some people prefer to just post to this forum rather than take the time to read it, maybe Adobe should update their guideline violation warning to include "Try again using a period or other non-alphabetical character as a prompt." 😉

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Community Volunteer | I don't make the rules; I just try to explain them.



--------------------------------

Why did Little Miss Muffet step on the spider? Because it got in her whey.
Translate
Report
Explorer ,
Jul 25, 2023 Jul 25, 2023

I'm just not sure Adobe's idea of 'improving the product' is the same as mine.

 

The introduction of this Ai feature seems to me to be being used to force restrictions on our use of the software which didn't exist before.

 

That doesn't feel like progress.

 

I don't care about whether it's a text prompt or a selection that is causing an error in Generative Fill. Why there are Adobe introducing any limitations at all?

 

I am aware that Ai could be used to create illegal content (just as Photoshop has always been able to), but are all of us millions of legitimate pro / enthusiast photographers and creatives REALLY going to be told by Adobe what we can and can't create in future, just because a tiny number of criminals could use it for nefarious purposes?

 

I know we are in beta, but I am presuming this auto-limitation is intended to be carried through to the release version?

 

If so, this really is ridiculous dictatorial big-brother stuff and I hope Adobe has a serious rethink.

Translate
Report
Explorer ,
Jul 25, 2023 Jul 25, 2023

agree 100%

Translate
Report
Explorer ,
Jul 25, 2023 Jul 25, 2023

Hi @Pete.Green , as we do see all more clearly now, putting a period (aka full stop) often fixes this problem (experienced beta users no do know this, while newcomers are still annoyed as they fear restrictive censorship behind this message and forget that it is still a beta version. I felt the same way at the beginning, first the excitement, then the disillusionment. I now find that this trick kills the message 99% of the time, and I see Firefly as a great addition to the daily workflow. Sure, it doesn't have the genrative abilities of other AI's, but that's not the point either. For corrections of any kind, which is the main part of Photoshop work, it's a great tool, and a real timesaver.

 

Three short questions and a suggestion:
1. What exactly does the period trick do behind the scenes on the programming side? (no company secrets, just to better understand the prompt logic)
2. Is there a general page from Adobe whith prompt tips and keywords, or is this planned for the release?
3. Is there an expected release date yet?

 

Regarding the unloved hint: Why not provide a direct feedback option right away in this modal? I think that would be a clear win-win situation, both user experience, as well as feeding your feedback database

Find attached a small demo, which would make me as a user way happier than the suspected blue (well, orange) lights of the vice squad 😉

 

Cheers, Phil

 

philbauch_1-1690305301163.png

 

 

Translate
Report
Community Expert ,
Jul 25, 2023 Jul 25, 2023

"Is there an expected release date yet?"

Well, considering that Photoshop's Neural Filter for Depth Blur was first introduced in July of 2021 and that it still remains in beta, I think it will be quite some time before we see a fully working version of Generative Fill. 🙂

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Community Volunteer | I don't make the rules; I just try to explain them.



--------------------------------

Why did Little Miss Muffet step on the spider? Because it got in her whey.
Translate
Report
Engaged ,
Jul 25, 2023 Jul 25, 2023

I honestly can't see it happening anytime soon. I'm not a kick on the backside off 70, so I reckon I'll be pushin up the daisies before it get's released. FAR too many bugs yet.

Translate
Report
Participant ,
Jul 25, 2023 Jul 25, 2023

I would agree. I got a warning over a common word (don't remember what it was, now) that wasn't being used for anything remotely related to sex. But it was a word that COULD be used for that purpose. I would've thought AI could detect the context of the photo. I did report it. 

Translate
Report
New Here ,
Jul 25, 2023 Jul 25, 2023

When asking the Ai to make a texture seemless it keeps sending me to the Adobe terms of service which suggests that the ai keeps attempting to create somethings it was never asked to make

Translate
Report
New Here ,
Jul 26, 2023 Jul 26, 2023

Почему это не работает? :((((

Translate
Report
New Here ,
Jul 26, 2023 Jul 26, 2023

I am having the same issues. Client would like a different cut of the swimwear and Adobe AI keeps adding coverage, sportsbras, full coverage swimsuits on the model every time. It is very frustrating.

Translate
Report
Community Expert ,
Jul 26, 2023 Jul 26, 2023

Hi @granadaprophoto what are you entering for a prompt? One reality users are going to have to deal with is learning how to enter specific, detailed and accurate prompts with any AI in order to get better results from the generation. I expect a big market on training materials for designers, photographers, etc to train them how to use effective AI and not rely on random results.

Translate
Report
New Here ,
Jul 27, 2023 Jul 27, 2023

Adding a prompt worked for me when I tried it for the second time. I just updated to version 24.7.0. Hope you all can figure out this bug. Thanks for the beta, I absolutely LOVE it! It's a game-changer. 🙂

Translate
Report
New Here ,
Jul 27, 2023 Jul 27, 2023

I keep getting a message that I am violating the use of generative fill.  I am now working on removing cords from a bathroom.  I have also had the same thing many times near a nose on a face. Or items against a person.  How can we get around this?

Translate
Report
Engaged ,
Jul 27, 2023 Jul 27, 2023

Add a period (.) or full stop (.) to your request

Translate
Report
Explorer ,
Jul 27, 2023 Jul 27, 2023

Community Guidelines restrictiveness renders RF (late July 25.0.0 beta) almost to the point of being useless except for the most mundane and safe tasks. I don't get it. Community guidelines should be enforced on saving files in Adobe public accessible and viewable areas, not while creating - editing. I would think that cloud server usage would be more important, as multiple failed attempts by virtually everyone that uses it have to be an issue. These falures MUST be wasting a lot of server resources. The AI is rather amazing in its technical abilities, but is absolutely awful at discering true X rated imagery. Who cares what the rating is if other measures are in place as I alluded to at the beginning. Pretty damn ironic that most of the violations I get are fills that the AI created. RF has been out long enough to address this despite it being a so called beta. This minimum age thing to use RF is also just madness .. though I'm well over 18. Adobe programmticlly impresses me somewhat sometimes, but often has me looking for alternatives ..

Translate
Report
Engaged ,
Jul 27, 2023 Jul 27, 2023

I had one earlier where i had a woman on the beach. I'd generated her head about 15 times as her faces were so hideous. Three of them violated user guidelines. My last one generated a mans head with long hair, and THAT too violated user guidelines 😅😅😅.  It certainly violated my brain before dinner LOL

Translate
Report