P: Generated images violate user guidelines

[Hematita]

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

[FitzFoto]

Strange, it works 100% of the time for me when I get a warning.

[FitzFoto]

Firefly doesn't like "nook", as in "a corner nook".  There's little rationality to it.  I wonder what it does about "beaver" and "butt", two words with straightforward meanings (an animal and the target end of an archery field)?

[daniellei4510]

On occasion, when a word is banned, I look it up on urbandictionary.com. There are often less than appropriate definitions for otherwise common words. This is an issue that will probably be fixed in time, especially once the bot learns to tale into account the context of the request.

[whirlabou]

Adobe better change this in the official version. This "guidelines" thing is hypocritical since you can add weapons without so much as a beep

[jeasolar]

I'm getting this all time, generation doesn't meet the guidlines, when I'm doing something as simple as removing a glare. Really frustrating. I make a simple selection and ask to generate without even a prompt. 

[DarthVengeant]

demon horde group

cloaked horde group

with and without period. BOTH "Violate Terms"

Any prompt I try to use with the word Blood in it "Violate Terms"

WHY????????????????????

Utterly ridiculous. 

[Alexia30336418briv]

I've now been having this issue on a senior photos. So obviously a very appropriate photo. I'm very frustrated because it worked once and now it's flagging everything. 

[CozyAce]

Adding another frustrated, working creative professional voice here - I'm unable to use generative fill for something as simple as improving the texture of a dress shirt when before I was able to create pretty much anything my imagination could come up with. The subject matter on my particular image is a boring asf male laywer headshot. Do you want us to use these tools or not? I get that we're in "beta" still so I'm not that surprised and I'm happy to help Adobe improve their tools but please make this tool more reliable over time not less... 

[jjaylad]

Hey guy, I feel your pain, but when I first posted having a similar problem some time back, people advised me to put a simple period "." in the dialog box. I don't have any issues now that I am putting either ONLY that period in the box or eles adding a period before or after the text I put in that box. Can you try that and let us know if it works?

[Molfy49]

I am attempting to correct problems in an old family picture.  The is a line on the picture that should not be there from the upper right hand quadrent accross the face and down to the lower left quadrent.  I broke the fix up into three solutions all using Beta v25.  I was able to use Photoshop Beta v25 to correct the first issue in the upper right hand quadrent with no issues.  When I tried a similar fix on the lower left quadrent I receive a message that states I am violating user guidelines.  I am not, this is a private family picture.

[sixsides]

[virewer discretion advised] I was not getting results with any word or phrase I typed into the generative fill, simple phrases like "internal conflict" or "military care" to spark some kind of stock image kept giving me the tired "violating guidelines" error -- once even a "we don't tolerate that language" kind of error. Just simple english, nothing vulgar.

On the other hand, just typing the word "anything" into the generative fill gave me some of the most disturbing nightmare fuel I've ever seen. What in the world is going on with this software?! These are the types of images PS beta should be focused on removing, good greif! More than a few bugs to work out I'm sure ☹

[daniellei4510]

Enter a period (.) in the generative fill box. Or, better yet, just use content aware fill.

[PB28]

"Generative fill violating community guidlines" is a constant problem for me.  Nothing I work on violates guidelines.  I just got a warming on an image with a girl peeking out of a door!   Is Adobe working on this issue? 

[David30122720qek7]

It would seem not. There's a constant stream of frustrated PS users, and little to no response from Adobe. I asked for a girl swimming yesterday, and got a string of adult women. I tried , dangerously, young girl swimming... And got a man. So I tried again and got a violation. Apparently a girl swimming, in a photograph of a beach, is just far too immoral. Sigh.

[Graham24508943nobd]

it doesn't seem like it at times. With each update it just gets worse.

[Graham24508943nobd]

try asking for kid swimming

[Graham24508943nobd]

I asked for nothing for a laugh and some of the images were simply vomit inducing

[Graham24508943nobd]

God knows how many times I asked for a woman posing on a beach and got some geezer with a beard. Sheeeesh

[Graham24508943nobd]

The bot won't even allow humanoid robot. It's way beyond a joke

[Graham24508943nobd]

NOW THAT's not on, somebodys' head needs to roll for this 

[Layla30674757fnau]

Out of interest which alternative generative AI systems are you looking at?

[Graham24508943nobd]

I'd a look at stable diffusion and some of the human generations were worse than Adobes.

[Encartauk]

The word 'kinks' should make your post blocked!

Joking of course.

But really Adobe, I was trying out generative fill with the lizard pic you provided, decided to add a jet fighter plane for it to be looking at and asked the prompt to add 'jet thrusts' and it blocked it because of a 'violation'! For the word 'thrusts'! I mean, I know it could be used in a sexual context but really! If your AI was smart enough it could tell it was being attached to the back of a plane - or even the fact the word 'jet' proceeded it.

Also, while I'm here, before I decided on a jet I was asking for a dragonfly, then asking it to be 'looking left', 'facing left', 'flying left' and no matter what I typed only about 10% of results had the thing facing left. Is your AI not smart enough to know left from right? Or if it's me, then it's not intuitive enough. It'd be good to have a 'flip' button on the Generative tool bar that flips the image easily - horizontally or vertically.

Also, why are the images not cutout by default? The new layer creates an area of opaque pixels that copy from the background, but if I change background I've then got to spend time cutting it out.

What you claim is going to be quick and save time, ends up in reality being us spending as much time trying many different prompts, with most results being unuseable or blocked, then having to tidy up/ cut out the result. I'd be better off sourcing my own jet or dragon fly than the monstrosities that get created.

I'm just getting tired of all the time Adobe claim their new feature is the best thing ever and works flawlessly and it clearly doesn't.

[Encartauk]

I wouldn't say they are any way near 'developed', but yeah it's a bit dodgy.

[Graham24508943nobd]

That's putting it mildly, I've had loads of women in my generations, shame they were ALL hideous

[abuse removed by moderator]