Generative fill is terrible

[Erich24415775jpml]

Im sorry, but im trying to change the gender on a person in a picture, and I specifically use words like "woman" and "female" and it gives me 90% men.  Was this tested before being released?

[luis daniel320322602ek9]

I strongly agree, it´s simply awfull, not a good thing can be said about it, never gets the context of the image nor the lights or the scale, also the faces oh my god

[Graham24508943nobd]

I tried 50 generations of a woman last month and they were all disgusting

[LovesMyWay]

Generative fill gets worse with each update in Beta.  It's ultra prudish - let's say I just have part of an arm and want the rest of the arm - I GET THE DREADED message.  I wanted to put a towel under a guy's arm in a swimsuit - NO.  So, I decided to be funny and select the top of the guy and say "body builder."  I got all kinds of iterations of the chest and arms of a body builder.  Sometimes it will put in questionable things and although distorted, it's clear.  Putting a period in doesn't work 99% of the time now.  With the last Beta update, it's gotten worse. 

[Graham24508943nobd]

I Had an open landscape refused recently, nothing but a river, trees and
fields.
As you say, it gets worse

[InfiniteWhale]

It's ridiculous that it's so insanely restrictive on top of being a pile of garbage.  If I want to make something NSFW then what the f*** business is it of Adobe?  How can a tool that I pay a lot of money for turn around and censor me? It's patently absurd. 

[Cheerful_amazement5C39]

1.5 years later its still totally useless.
Adobe stopped being an design company years ago. It's a stock vehicle now.
Corporate sell outs training their AI on you and charging you for the privilege.