Generative fill is terrible

[Erich24415775jpml]

Im sorry, but im trying to change the gender on a person in a picture, and I specifically use words like "woman" and "female" and it gives me 90% men.  Was this tested before being released?

[Sterphy]

It's actually shocking that they are charging extra for this feature in the form of credits.  It's absolutely ridiculous.  Does Adobe even have a business plan or is everyone in the company improvising every day? 

[Graham24508943nobd]

I must agree, it's good for landscapes, but nothing much else. The human & animal generations are gruesome. A lot of the extended generations leave much to be desired. But, the worst by far are human faces and limbs. Utterly vile. One evening I did over 60 generations and not a single face was like a human. Even zombies would run away from them. I thought this would be fabulous 18 months ago, but in reality, it gets worse every update. 

[luis daniel320322602ek9]

I strongly agree, it´s simply awfull, not a good thing can be said about it, never gets the context of the image nor the lights or the scale, also the faces oh my god

[Graham24508943nobd]

I tried 50 generations of a woman last month and they were all disgusting

[LovesMyWay]

Generative fill gets worse with each update in Beta.  It's ultra prudish - let's say I just have part of an arm and want the rest of the arm - I GET THE DREADED message.  I wanted to put a towel under a guy's arm in a swimsuit - NO.  So, I decided to be funny and select the top of the guy and say "body builder."  I got all kinds of iterations of the chest and arms of a body builder.  Sometimes it will put in questionable things and although distorted, it's clear.  Putting a period in doesn't work 99% of the time now.  With the last Beta update, it's gotten worse. 

[Graham24508943nobd]

I Had an open landscape refused recently, nothing but a river, trees and
fields.
As you say, it gets worse

[InfiniteWhale]

It's ridiculous that it's so insanely restrictive on top of being a pile of garbage.  If I want to make something NSFW then what the f*** business is it of Adobe?  How can a tool that I pay a lot of money for turn around and censor me? It's patently absurd. 

[Cheerful_amazement5C39]

1.5 years later its still totally useless.
Adobe stopped being an design company years ago. It's a stock vehicle now.
Corporate sell outs training their AI on you and charging you for the privilege.

[jonatalima]

it is still too much bas. deformed and blured shapes

[Graham24508943nobd]

Totally agree, tried 10 generations this afternoon, 1/2 were against guidelines and the other half were rubbish, extra limbs, missing limbs, horrible distorted faces and worse

[DazzlingVastness]

I only ever use generative fill to remove things. But I must agree, even for that simple and basic purpose, it is generally awful. Occasionally it works perfectly, but I'm astounded that, for example, if I remove something from a tile floor, the tile floor it replaces it with is often a darker color, or sometimes it will add some random alien object onto the floor, or the tile paterns are way off or entirely missing. You would think something as simple as that would be easy for it to do. Same thing with carpet. When removing an object from carpet, the carpet it replaces it with, again, is often a different shade of color, and almost always, the carpet looks extremely degraded and very low resolution. When I "enhance detail" it almost invariably looks even worse. Can it not be trained to sample the actual surface it's trying to reproduce and make a perfect replica - color, texture, patterns?

[Graham24508943nobd]

Agreed, I've had a lawn overgrown with weeds, replaced with litter. Dreadful

[defaultb3vqi30b2fpq]

I feel like generative fill has gotten worse. When I first started using it, it was actually producing usable things. But now I can't even get it to fill a basic color. I don't know what they started doing. I have nothing but bad things to say about Adobe products