Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi
I am a colourist working in Davinci resolve
I often receive films from, and send them back to , editors working in Premiere Pro
Here is the problem I have:
When one film clip is used twice in the same timeline, I will be sent one clip from the editor but I will send two clips back
My graded clips will have timecode, and Premiere Pro will happliy reconnect to one of them
The problem is, as soon as Premiere reconnects one timeline clip to one graded clip, it automatically reconnects the second timeline clip as well to the first graded clip and ignores the second.
And then it fails to work becaiuse there is now a timecode mismatch.
And then, it will not allow me to make the second clip offline without making both clips offline.
btwI know I could use an xml, but I want to allow the editor to continue working on their original timeline.
Thanks!
Alan
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Alan,
I would instruct the editor to make note of, then conform any clips which are used more than once. Each of these would be assigned a unique name. I don't think this would take too much extra time if the workflow only includes a few instances of this occurring. Would that work?
Thanks,
Kevin
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
interesting question.
like, say in a mystery show we see a criminal do a bad thing and then a detective ( later on ) 'imagines' the crime in black and white clip of same footage …
Don't know but maybe davinci could duplicate and rename the clip rather than the editor doing it ??? Scripts change and stuff happens during shoots so the editor on day 1 of shoot may not KNOW a clip is gonna be used again later.
good question.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
this link was interesting... copy paste to media pool... is dealing with fusion but might work in color page too, after all, it's the media pool.
duh...
I don't know if I have anything on laptop to test it with ...maybe...will do a test maybe...
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
yikes.. I just spent about 2 hours messing with this on laptop... took a clip from beginning of a timeline, stuck it on end, turned off saturation to make it black and white, and jumped through every menu option I could find to 'duplicate, rename, or find a way to create a new instance of the same clip but NOT be the same clip from media pool. No joy.
Would have saved a lot of time just going to the O.S. level, select clip in question, rename the stupid thing ( save as ) and stick it in the same spot on timeline ( replace clip might work, haven't got to that point yet ). Then do the color stuff on it.
I guess I'll end up trying that next, when I have the stamina.
Time for a beer.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I think, at this point, Kevin is right.. make those other guys do it !!!!
hehe
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi Kevin
I see that you work for Adobe, thank you for joining in.
Yes having the Editor manually conform all duplicated clips would work.
But it would be really interesting to find out why Adobe Premiere will not do it automatically.
I have been having this discussion on a Resolve forum, (Lift Gamma Gain), and the consensus is that Adobe Premiere has some sort of internal loging that notes when multiple timeline clips are coming from the same camera clip, and this logging is what prevents someone from relinking two clips that originated from a single camera clip to two clips that have been graded in DaVinci.
Are we correct?
Does Premiere forbid this action, and therefore a manual conform of duplicated clips is the only way to do it?
Note to people who way 'make the other guy do it'... in this industry, the Editor is the client and the colourist is the supplier... so the onus is on the supplier to do everything in their power to take care of every possible task that needs to be done.
If I have to ask my client to do it by hand, that's fine, as long as I have already done everything I could to avoid that.
Thanks
Alan
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
There are a LOT of jobs round-tripped from Pr/Resolve/Pr daily. Some folks have this worked out, some ... have troubles.
I know Patrick Inhofer over on the MixingLight.com site has several tutorials on building a solid basis for round-tripping from Pr, and I think this is included in those tutorials. Pat occasionally jumps in on LGG, maybe he will. He's good at this.
Neil
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
the Editor is the client and the colourist is the supplier
I've seen a LOT of requests on both this and the Resolve forums asking for help when handing a project off to the next person in the pipeline.
Which tells me that the colorist, effects or sound guy having specific requirements is pretty common.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Have the editor import the same clip twice, and use each only once.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I think I kinda tried that … in editor … duplicated clip, even renamed it sorta, but it ends up being he same clip when you go to color page and grade it... ( to B&W in my case ). When you go to media pool and click on the clips they are what you had to begin with ( color in this case ). The timeline timecode don't matter I don't think.. it's the grade that's not happening. ??? It's NOT a new instance of the clip. It's the same one.
On export you would see the B/W but sending stuff back would be the same stupid clip you got to begin with.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
last effort just now...
moved clip I 'changed' ( used twice in same timeline, one color one black and white )...
On O.S. level, moved the clip in question to a temp directory. Renamed it CLIP 1 black and white ). Moved it BACK to the source directory of editing stuff... now have same clip with two names.
Put new clip on end of timeline and desaturated to B&W. in color page.
NOW, when you send it back to editor it will have the new clip with grade attached properly In My Opinion.
Unfortunately you have to trim the stupid thing to the edit you want as well as do the color stuff … cause the clip is the thing before in and out points were made.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Alan, this forum is user to user stuff. An open avenue for people to help one another try to solve problems. It is a totally separate partition from the other departments of Adobe relative to programming, designing, implementing and so on. You must have some idea how complicated a large software company operates on this scale... think of all the products stuff into the bag. The difficulty of getting 10 pounds into a 5 pound bag just keep increasing as more years of changes and additions are added. If you don't get it then nothing I say is gonna make a difference. But NOBODY you ever meet here in the forum, staff or special envoy, or anyone with medals and medallions, is gonna be WORKING for adobe in the sense you apparently think they do. They are lucky to be holding onto their jobs with some security just dealing with THE FORUM.
And luckily Kevin is very good and pays attention and keeps up on what's up as best he can. That means he goes out of his way to keep learning what the problems people experience are.. and uses the resources at his disposal to suggest solutions. He's very good at it. But he is NOT yapping with the people who are dealing with the huge block diagrams and programming department heads responsible for making the software. Nobody would be able to do that and play with kids on the forums, which is what 80% of this forum is about.
You have to do the searching and trials and fixing yourself and ask , and HOPE someone says something that clicks in your own head to lead you in a direction to solve the problem.
Good luck !
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
when I did my test yesterday I used the 'age of airplanes' tutorial project for resolve 15. I took the first clip from media pool and put it on end of timeline, went to color and made it black and white. same in out points. when now looking at media pool (thumbnails) resolve started acting weird, showing it offline until I put mouse over it. weird. played OK on timeline. But I've had that problem before ( offline thing, using 4k in 1080 timeline before optimizing (basically proxy)). So something wasn't right. plus the clip is the same clip, same name, same duration, etc. Sending back to someone would be same problem poster is having.
Soooo, I copied the clip to a temp directory, renamed it ( adding B-W to end of name), moved THAT into source directory, and now have new filename of same clip. Put on end of timeline, and NO IN OUT POINTS LIKE ORIGINAL. Had to TRIM the clip to match the original, then turn B&W. Save, etc. Now I got something that works and when sent BACK to someone a new file ( new clip) is added to the thing.
That should work,, but it's not ideal. Maybe there's a way for the editor to 'know' when stuff is gonna be duplicated later in grading process... and they can duplicate, rename, and (with same in out points) put that in the timeline they send to colorist. Makes sense to me...
Find more inspiration, events, and resources on the new Adobe Community
Explore Now