Skip to main content
A
Anonymous
July 22, 2008
Answered

Producing Help 2 from RoboHelp

  • July 22, 2008
  • 2 replies
  • 570 views
We've been using RoboHelp HTML for quite some time, but now the applications we document are being ported to Visual Studio, and we have to be able to produce Help 2. I know it's possible to use FAR, or to take our .xpj to Doc-To-Help and dump Help 2 from DTH, but we'd rather stick with RoboHelp. Does anyone know if Adobe has any plans to support the ability to produce Help 2 with RoboHelp? Thanks.
    This topic has been closed for replies.
    Correct answer Captiv8r
    Hi again

    That's a strange coincidence then. Your post arrived here about five minutes after a nearly identical post was made to HATT.

    If you really want to gain Adobe's ear, you need to use the Wish Form to suggest this.

    Click here to view the WishForm/Bug Reporting Form

    Cheers... Rick

    2 replies

    P
    Pete_Lees
    Participating Frequently
    July 22, 2008
    Hi,

    If you want to stick with RoboHelp, you might use it to build an HTML Help 1.x (.chm) file and then convert this to Help 2.0 with FAR — a very quick process, and usually straightfoward. Obviously, though, this may mean that you can't take advantage of all the facilities of Help 2.0, such as dynamic help.

    If RoboHelp doesn't provide the option to build Help 2.0 files then it's not so different from most other help authoring tools. I'd imagine that most HAT vendors have taken a look at Help 2.0 at one time or another and, perhaps wrongly, decided that it's too marginal a format to waste development hours on. To my knowledge, only Doc-To-Help, Help & Manual, HelpStudio, and FAR are capable of outputting Help 2.0 files.

    Pete
    Captiv8r
    Captiv8r
    Legend
    July 22, 2008
    Welcome to our community, Roger (I'm assuming you are Roger Bell that posted the same question on HATT)

    To my knowledge, RoboHelp doesn't do anything to facilitate Help 2 output. If you are absolutely certain you MUST create Help 2, you should probably investigate fellow Microsoft MVP Rob Chandler's HelpWare site.

    http://www.helpware.net/

    Please note that simple WebHelp works quite well if an application is web based. As far as whether Adobe has any plans for making RoboHelp "Help 2" capable, I'd be doubtful but only Adobe themselves can say for sure. I say doubtful, as Help 2 never really took off from the Help Authoring point of view. AFAIK, it's pretty much only been used internally by Microsoft.

    Cheers... Rick
    A
    Anonymous
    July 22, 2008
    Thanks, Rick. No, I'm not Roger. I'll check out HATT.

    I'm afraid Help 2 is going to be a requirement for us.

    I have seen Rob Chandler's site. But, naturally, we'd rather stick with RoboHelp if possible.

    If anyone has any information about Adobe's intent here, I'd be very interested.

    Thanks.
    Captiv8r
    Captiv8rCorrect answer
    Legend
    July 22, 2008
    Hi again

    That's a strange coincidence then. Your post arrived here about five minutes after a nearly identical post was made to HATT.

    If you really want to gain Adobe's ear, you need to use the Wish Form to suggest this.

    Click here to view the WishForm/Bug Reporting Form

    Cheers... Rick
    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
    Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices