AI-generated picture low quality

I would say this is for @Contributor1 to have a look at those 3 assets.

158793189 (you only attached the image) is a real asset. It is too old to be generative AI. But it has been very poorly edited.

As a side note: you should never post original assets here, even if they are of poor quality.

Well, we've certainly seen worse. Far worse. There are some obvious issues here that certainly should have been corrected before they were submitted. As I've stated elsewhere, I don't blame the moderators. They're only human and I don't envy anyone spending eight hours or possibly more per day looking at images of others, be they AI or actual photographs (which have also made it through when they shouldn't have). It is the responsbility of the AI designers and photographers alike to catch such issues.

As someone who submits 100% AI, it's a needle in my spine every time such images manage to get through. I spent over two hours today editing an AI image and I'll probably give it another once-over before I decide to submit it. Bad AI has resulted in a slow-down of images being accepted, in addition to enabling a means to keep AI out of search result (which affect my potential sales), and giving AI a bad name in general. I am hopeful the situation will improve over time.