Skip to main content
I
Ismail32162360b1rz
Participating Frequently
October 5, 2023
Répondu

AI files rejected - Generative AI

My four AI files were rejected for the following reasons:

- Non compliant use of another artist’s name.

- Undeclared Generative AI Content.

- Content not compliant with overall guidelines

can someone help me understand why, because I got similar files in the review, and I did mention "Generative AI" in the title and also in the tags, and they say "Undeclared Generative AI Content", which is wrong.

title: wooden podium platform in the middle of a cave, created by Generative AI

title: round wooden podium platform on a dark background, created by Generative AI

title: empty podium stage in a cave with a light shining through it, created by Generative AI

title: empty cave with a podium platform in the middle of it, created by Generative AI



tags: podium, presentation, platform, stage, template, shelves, skincare, luxury, show, display, shapes, interior, health care, studio, advertising, commercial, empty, white, modern, space, abstract, cosmetic, clean, primitive, scene, entrance, exhibition, 3d

 

    Ce sujet a été fermé aux réponses.
    Meilleure réponse par Abambo

    The wood: besides colour noise, sharpness and other defects, you should look out for artefacts like this:

    Document preview of empty podium stage in a cave with a light shining through it.jpeg

    The same here with the rocks (left side):

    Document preview of empty cave with a podium platform in the middle of it.jpeg:

    Noise and other artefacts as shown here (shadow area):

    Document preview of empty cave with a podium platform in the middle of it.jpeg

    Artefacts, noise:

     

    I see errors pretty everywhere in the images, so I've only shown some extracts here. None of the assets looks very realistic. I saw that good with the wooden structure.

     

    But these are quality issues.

    4 commentaires

    daniellei4510
    daniellei4510
    Community Expert
    October 6, 2023

    Putting the reasons given for rejection aside for a moment, I'm wondering about your keywording in general. I don't see how skincare, cosmetic and health care come into play here. And did you label these Photos or Illustrations? What was your sub-category. I assume Graphic Resource? Yet graphic resource is missing in your keywording, which would fit well in these cases.

    Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
      daniellei4510
      daniellei4510
      Community Expert
      October 5, 2023

      @Abambo is correct. You only need to click the box as shown. And since no people or property appear in the images provided, you would select "No," as shown in the attached screenshot. Stating in the title or keywords that you are submitting AI  content is no longer required.

      Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
        Abambo
        Abambo
        Community Expert
        October 5, 2023
        quote

        and I did mention "Generative AI" in the title and also in the tags, and they say "Undeclared Generative AI Content", which is wrong.


        By @Ismail32162360b1rz

        According to the guidelines, you only need to tick this to have correctly tagged your asset:

         

        ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
          I
          Ismail32162360b1rzAuteur
          Participating Frequently
          October 6, 2023

          I've selected this option, these AI files were uploaded before the new update, so I added "generative AI" to the title and the keywords

          Abambo
          Abambo
          Community Expert
          October 6, 2023
          quote

          I've selected this option, these AI files were uploaded before the new update, so I added "generative AI" to the title and the keywords


          By @Ismail32162360b1rz

          Then your tags were incomplete, as you should have also there added several mandatory tags.

          ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
          Abambo
          AbamboRéponse
          Community Expert
          October 5, 2023

          The wood: besides colour noise, sharpness and other defects, you should look out for artefacts like this:

          Document preview of empty podium stage in a cave with a light shining through it.jpeg

          The same here with the rocks (left side):

          Document preview of empty cave with a podium platform in the middle of it.jpeg:

          Noise and other artefacts as shown here (shadow area):

          Document preview of empty cave with a podium platform in the middle of it.jpeg

          Artefacts, noise:

           

          I see errors pretty everywhere in the images, so I've only shown some extracts here. None of the assets looks very realistic. I saw that good with the wooden structure.

           

          But these are quality issues.

          ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
            I
            Ismail32162360b1rzAuteur
            Participating Frequently
            October 6, 2023

            I didn't pay much attention because they were accepted by another stock photo platform, The AI files were good when I created them, but I used Topaz Gigapixel AI to upscale them. Topaz Gigapixel AI can sometimes introduce artifacts and noise, which I think may have happened because I chose the wrong settings or upscaled the images too much. Next time, I'll try upscaling them by 2x only.

            Abambo
            Abambo
            Community Expert
            October 6, 2023

            Getting acceptance on one platform does not guarantee acceptance here.

            ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
              Conditions d'utilisationAccessibility statement
              Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices