Skip to main content
Olmyntay
Known Participant
May 18, 2023
Answered

Deviation question

  • May 18, 2023
  • 6 replies
  • 1983 views

In principle, I understand the reasons for the rejection of some of my work.
But in this case, not so much! Could there be an explanation for this?
Maybe the moderator made a mistake? ) 

I apologize if I wrote the wrong message in the wrong place.

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Abambo

Generally speaking, the images are too small to make an in-depth analysis of the images. But even at this size, you see multiple issues. For example:

 

I am not convinced that the cars per se have an IP problem. Except when the radiator figure is a bit more detailed in one of the pictures. The quality issues are, however, correct.

 

6 replies

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 19, 2023

I don't understand your question.

Did you steal these still shots from a copyright protected movie?

You can't do that!!!  It's illegal.

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
Olmyntay
OlmyntayAuthor
Known Participant
May 19, 2023

these images are created by AI. They can't be from the movie. They are unique. 🙂 

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 19, 2023
quote

They are unique. 🙂 


By @Olmyntay

==========

AI is trained on actual images.  Where those images are sourced is anyone's guess.  So probably not as unique as you think. 😉 

 

Start with high resolution diffusions.  It costs more to generate high-res images but Stock won't accept anything less.

 

AI is imperfect especially with fine details.  It takes artistic talent to find & fix all AI imperfections.  Some people can do it, some can't.  Discard any you can't fix.

 

Generative AI Illustrations could take 1-3 months to be reviewed.  Make the most of every AI image you submit.  Focus on quality instead of quantity.

 

Generative AI Submission Requirements:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-content.html
===========
Model/Property Releases:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/model-release.html
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/property-release.html

 

Good luck.

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
Abambo
Community Expert
AbamboCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
May 19, 2023

Generally speaking, the images are too small to make an in-depth analysis of the images. But even at this size, you see multiple issues. For example:

 

I am not convinced that the cars per se have an IP problem. Except when the radiator figure is a bit more detailed in one of the pictures. The quality issues are, however, correct.

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Olmyntay
OlmyntayAuthor
Known Participant
May 19, 2023

Oh, you may be right!
Thank you very much! 🙂 

RALPH_L
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 18, 2023

The image type is wrong.

Png is to have a transparent background.

Photo and Illustrations must be jpeg.

Requirements for contributing photos and illustrations to Adobe Stock

 

Olmyntay
OlmyntayAuthor
Known Participant
May 18, 2023

I upload a lot of PNGs without a transparent background, they are usually accepted. 

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 19, 2023
quote

I upload a lot of PNGs without a transparent background, they are usually accepted. 


By @Olmyntay

It's against the rules.

 

For PNG files, it's very unusual to have JPEG compression artefacts in the image.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 18, 2023

In the first image, the car on the right looks like a Rolls Royce. The neck of the man in the right is messed up.

In the second image, the man on the right has only one large leg and one foot. Overall, the image is quite soft

Third image is also quite soft, and the windows in the car in the left don't quite make sense.

 

 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Olmyntay
OlmyntayAuthor
Known Participant
May 18, 2023

Thank you very much!
I'm very happy with your answers! 🙂

Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 18, 2023

Glad to be of assistance. Good luck with your future submissions.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
George_F
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 18, 2023

From my perspective, these have both IP issues and Quality issues.

 

The cars look pretty detailed and distinct to me.  I'm assuming this to be an IP issue.

 

These are some of the better A.I. illustrations I've seen, but there are noticeable errors if you study the details.  The changes between textures are noticeable in all 3 shots in my opinion.  Some of the silhouettes have artefacts around them.

 

Again, some of the better ones that I've seen.  Cheers!

George F, Photographer & Forum Volunteer
Olmyntay
OlmyntayAuthor
Known Participant
May 18, 2023

Thank you very much!
Yes, of course there are mistakes.
It seemed to me that this is normal for generating AI.
I have seen accepted images with much bigger problems. For example, pictures on the topic "Boeing AI" 🙂 

Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 18, 2023

Yes, there are a lot of flawed AI images in the database, but I think Moderators are getting more skilled at detecting flaws and will reject images for flaws that might have gotten accepted months ago.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
George_F
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 18, 2023

What reason did Adobe list for the rejection?

George F, Photographer & Forum Volunteer
Olmyntay
OlmyntayAuthor
Known Participant
May 18, 2023

QUALITY ISSUES 

🙂