Finding quality issues before submitting images

Impossible Things (https://things.co/) is similar, if not the same. Great for wedding and event photographers possibly, since that is what the apps are most likely trained on, but doubtful for AI, which might include fantasy images, cartoons, illustrations, etc. I'd still end up checking (and probably fixing to my liking) the results

Thanks everyone for all your help. I must say I'm reading all I can, but at times my thought process seems to go haywire. Mostly because I find adobe site hard to navigate. There is a mixture between contributor pages and buyers pages and it seems I always get something related to buying when I'm looking for info for contributors. Adobe is here to make money so understandable.

Thanks for the input. I do use Topaz Photo AI. After some rejections, I tried to pinpoint what I did wrong by using ChatGPT4 and claude. It usually came back with results saying no issues.

For example, here is ChatGPT feedback on one of the images that was rejected.

My prompt to ChatpGPT  was to  analyze the attached image for any quality issues, and below is the results it gave.

The attached image is a highly detailed painting of a young man in a gritty, urban setting. Here are some key qualities and features of the image:

Style: The painting has a realistic, hyper-detailed style, capturing textures, lighting, and depth with precision.

Subject: The young man, dressed in a worn orange t-shirt and baggy, distressed jeans, stands in a relaxed pose on a graffiti-covered staircase. His expression is stern and intense, adding to the overall gritty atmosphere.

Background: The setting is a city street at night, filled with neon lights, graffiti, and signs. The background is bustling with activity, indicated by the vibrant lights and deep shadows.

Color Palette: The painting uses a mix of dark tones and vivid colors. The neon lights provide pops of red, blue, and yellow, contrasting with the darker, more subdued tones of the urban environment.

Lighting: There is a dramatic use of lighting, highlighting the subject while casting deep shadows in the background. This creates a sense of depth and draws attention to the main figure.

Textures and Details: The artist has meticulously depicted textures, from the roughness of the man's clothing to the grime and wear of the staircase and surrounding environment. The attention to detail is evident in the small elements, like the tattoo on the man’s arm, the chains around his neck, and the scattered objects on the stairs.

These qualities combine to create a visually striking and immersive scene, full of life and narrative potential.

After running, it through the ChatGPT analyzes, that is when I start counting toes, fingers, etc. I may be wrong, but  what can't be analyzed is what images Adobe is looking for. If the image analyzed above has no quality issues other than it isn't what Adobe is looking for, it may be rejected.  Not saying this is true, but I do suspect it may be the case, Maybe I should stop pounding my head against the wall tying to figure it out.  ... Thanks again...I appreciate the feedback

 I thought about that, but thinking that there may be software available to help identify flaws, making the process easier. However, even AI might not achieve what a human can. I say that, suspecting that even a perfect image, might still be rejected if it isn't what adobe is looking for.