Skip to main content
Angela Micheli Otwell
Angela Micheli Otwell
Known Participant
January 9, 2023
Answered

Generative AI rejections. Please help.

  • January 9, 2023
  • 3 replies
  • 2935 views

I read the directions carefully, and I have submitted 10 AI images with 7 rejections. Oof! I hate to waste the reviewers' time. I understand a couple of them, but I can't see the difference between some of the rejected ones and some of the accepted ones.  Here are some examples of rejected images. They all said "Quality Issues." What am I doing wrong?? 

    This topic has been closed for replies.
    Correct answer George_F

    In general when zoomed in to 100% view, these examples are slightly blurry and are lacking fine detail, and there is noticeable noise and artefacts.  Filters or effects, or the appearance of them, are mostly discouraged.

    3 replies

    Bolli Hotshots
    Bolli Hotshots
    New Participant
    March 19, 2023

    Hi Angela, 

     

    I have better experiences with AI based upscaler removing artefacts/pixels as well. In comparison AI Upscaler like Nero AI upscaler work much better than the traditional upscaler in Photoshop or the Midjourney upscaler. Try it out..
    Best luck, Bolli

      Abambo
      Abambo
      Community Expert
      March 19, 2023
      quote

      Hi Angela, 

       

      I have better experiences with AI based upscaler removing artefacts/pixels as well. In comparison AI Upscaler like Nero AI upscaler work much better than the traditional upscaler in Photoshop or the Midjourney upscaler. Try it out..
      Best luck, Bolli


      By @Bolli Hotshots

      I doubt that your upscale is performing well. But in all cases, you are violating the terms of your contributor agreement, by uploading scaled up assets and that will get you banned.

      ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
        Abambo
        Abambo
        Community Expert
        March 19, 2023

        As a side note: some artefacts get “enhanced” by upscaling, making them more visible.

        ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
          jacquelingphoto2017
          jacquelingphoto2017
          Community Expert
          January 9, 2023

          Hi @Angela Micheli Otwell ,

          I suggest you read through how to create better photos for Adobe Stock and these tips that will help you identify flaws.

          Best wishes

          Jacquelin

            Angela Micheli Otwell
            Angela Micheli OtwellAuthor
            Known Participant
            January 9, 2023

            The tips in "these tips" might be very helpful, but I was hugely turned off by the auto audio that started playing and startled me badly. Just FYI. 

              Nancy OShea
              Nancy OShea
              Community Expert
              January 9, 2023

              What audio???

               

              Perhaps I don't notice any audio because autoplay is blocked from my browser preferences.   Highly recommended, BTW. 😉

              https://support.mozilla.org/kb/block-autoplay

               

              Nancy O'Shea— Product User, Community Expert & Moderator
              George_F
              George_FCorrect answer
              Community Expert
              January 9, 2023

              In general when zoomed in to 100% view, these examples are slightly blurry and are lacking fine detail, and there is noticeable noise and artefacts.  Filters or effects, or the appearance of them, are mostly discouraged.

              George F, Photographer & Forum Volunteer
                Angela Micheli Otwell
                Angela Micheli OtwellAuthor
                Known Participant
                January 9, 2023

                Thank you!  I realize you're a photographer and may not be a "digital artist" - maybe someone else could answer.  But I find myself having difficulty reducing noise or sharpening without it looking like some other filter. Any tips? I have both photographs and traditional art in my Adobe stock portfolio, and the standards are different for each (and I can comply with them, with a fairly high percentage of accepted submissions), but I am having trouble figuring out where the standards fall for AI. For traditional art illustration, for example, paper texture is okay, but it seems to not be for AI, even when attempting to simulate traditional art media? I'm very confused. 

                George_F
                George_F
                Community Expert
                January 9, 2023

                The file type being submitted in would dictate the standards in my opinion.  These are submitted as jpgs, so they'll be scrutinized as photos.  I don't submit vectors so I know very little of their quality requirements.

                 

                For noise reduction and sharpening to be successful, there needs to be a good starting point with a lot of time detail present.  I think this will challenging with AI, as the content has been sourced and manipulated already, potentially compressing the information used.  And who knows how the original files looked when they started.  I think however the AI program outputs a file is more or less what you are left with, and it's up to you to judge if the quality is sufficient for Adobes standards.

                 

                Good luck!

                George F, Photographer & Forum Volunteer
                  Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
                  Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices