Skip to main content
PBJM Studios
Inspiring
February 20, 2025
Answered

Gob smacked by Adobe and their classification of quality issues

  • February 20, 2025
  • 5 replies
  • 2983 views

It's not often that I am left speechless by Adobe but they have really hit the nail on the head with this.

 

I have submitted some photos for Adobe Stock and they have either been rejected due to "Quality Issues" namely File ID: 1196706180 and File ID: 1196835355 or "Intellectual Property Refusal" namely File ID: 1196835074 or File ID: 1209400354. 

Regarding the Quality issues - It is in sharp focus, it is color corrected using Adobe Lightroom and it is in 8300 by 5864 so it is not small. Where is the problem.

Then there is the Intellectual Property Refusal refusal of a skyline. It has been refused because its at night and its of Los Angeles. Yet I have just been on Adobe Stock and found an image for sale (not as clear quality) e.g Los Angeles night skyline in LA, California, USA Stock Photo | Adobe Stock

 

Please help me understand because I cannot get my head around Adobe's 'quality control'

 

Thank you

 

Duncan

Correct answer Abambo

Of course night shots do not need to be underexposed. That is the difficulty of night shots. None of my night shots are underexposed.

5 replies

Legend
February 20, 2025

They don't look sharp to me. But maybe you didn't upload in full resolution.

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 20, 2025

Were these taken with a mobile phone? Display P3 is a common profile used in cell phones. Sharpness is difficult to determine at the size submitted, but focusing does appear soft in both assets, especially the cityscape.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 20, 2025

Camera Information
Make: Panasonic
Model: DC-S1R;
Owner:
Lens: LUMIX S 70-200/F2.8;
Shot Information
Focal Length: 117.00 mm (in 35mm: 126 mm)
Exposure: 1/10 sec, f/2.8; ISO 320; Manual; Pattern metering
Image Size: 1290 x 774
Orientation: 1 (Normal)
Resolution: 200.00 Pixel per Inch
Flash: Did not fire

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
PBJM Studios
Inspiring
February 20, 2025

No, it wasnt shot on a mobile phone. The details above are correct. However, this was rejected due to Intellectual Property Refusal

 

Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 20, 2025

The first image is underexposed and blurry. The second image has lens spots in the sky and blownout areas.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
PBJM Studios
Inspiring
February 20, 2025

I do appreciate what you are saying here. 

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 20, 2025

LA Holiday at night: It is underexposed

and I see noise, even in that small picture.

 

Size is not a quality criterion. And for the IP refusal, check for logos and the same. That's probably the IP refusal cause.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
PBJM Studios
Inspiring
February 20, 2025

Of course it will be under exposed - its a nigh time shot. I dont understand your point

Abambo
Community Expert
AbamboCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
February 20, 2025

Of course night shots do not need to be underexposed. That is the difficulty of night shots. None of my night shots are underexposed.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 20, 2025

Whatever the issues are, you are using the wrong profile. Adobe requires sRGB for stock.

 

Malibu: the counter light effect disturbed me. For the rest, your 2 images are too small for us to check correctly. Upload the assets as submitted.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer