Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
0

Learning about rejection by artifacts

Community Beginner ,
Feb 11, 2025 Feb 11, 2025

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I don’t want to complain, I just want to learn how to avoid these mistakes in the future.

Here are some of my latest photos that have been accepted or rejected. Some of them are very similar, so I’d like to understand why. Thanks! 🙏🏻

 

apple-7.jpgapple-8.jpgavocado-2.jpgavocado-3.jpgavocado-5.jpgavocado-1.jpgavocado-4.jpgavocado-6.jpggranatum-3.jpggranatum-4.jpg

TOPICS
Contributor critique , Contributors

Views

171
Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 11, 2025 Feb 11, 2025

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Something odd about the positioning of this apple.

 

Untitled-1.jpg


daniellei4510 | Community Forum Volunteer
---------------------------------------------------------
I am my cat's emotional support animal.

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 11, 2025 Feb 11, 2025

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I looked at your last photo and this is what I see:
-- It lacks contrast and has no all whit pixels.
-- The background is distracting.
-- The photo is not sharp.
-- The composition should leave space for text.

I altered these points in LR and PS for this example:

granatum-4-Edit-Edit.jpg

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Feb 11, 2025 Feb 11, 2025

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thank you for taking the time 🙏🏻! So, should the histogram cover the full range from black to white?

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 11, 2025 Feb 11, 2025

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Optimal, there should  be a full range with the most in the mid-range. This is not always possible if a low- or high-key photo.
But you should try to get contrast and as much mid-range as possible. Here you see there is black and white in the histogramm even though they are not promonent in the photo.

RALPH_L_0-1739307635232.png

 

  

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 12, 2025 Feb 12, 2025

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Just checking the 2 apple pictures:

Both are not excessive sharp, but the sharpness is OK. But if you check the exposure, you see a difference:

Abambo_1-1739354673419.png

 

Abambo_2-1739354699768.png

So the green apples are underexposed, the red ones are correctly exposed, even that both could be pimped up a bit.

Abambo_3-1739354916849.png

The histogram is still correct:

New:

Abambo_4-1739354962391.png

Old:

Abambo_5-1739355028188.png

 

You should use a background that is less prominent. You could enhance the local contrasts (called Texture and Clarity in Camera Raw and Lightroom) and add a bit of sharpness. If you shoot raw, the modifications here should not be an issue.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Feb 12, 2025 Feb 12, 2025

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thank you very much 🙏🏻! So, using the full spectrum in the histogram seems to be very important for Adobe Stock standards, I try not to overexpose so no information is lost, but I imagine Adobe Stock is looking for an immediate commercial asset.

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 12, 2025 Feb 12, 2025

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

quote

but I imagine Adobe Stock is looking for an immediate commercial asset.


By @Horacetron

Sure.

quote

I try not to overexpose so no information is lost


By @Horacetron

That's correct. I always do several pictures at different exposures. I can then choose the asset that is the nearest to the ideal exposure, and I can take parts from the other pictures to enhance the picture. When there are moving parts, that last is more difficult, however.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 12, 2025 Feb 12, 2025

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Yes, the expectation is that a Buyer can use your image with no further edits. 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines