Quality problems

Forum|Forum|2 years ago
November 2, 2023
5 replies
1772 views

Hello! I created this image, it was rejected. Quality problems. Seriously ? Explain in more detail? (Image 6784x6784 had to be compressed a little JPG to attach)

This topic has been closed for replies.

Correct answer Abambo

I am certainly grateful to you for this analysis, I accept criticism and absolutely understand the problems of AI generation and human labor. I'm sorry if something is wrong. And I apologize for the quality of the auto-translation (!) But I also used to trust my sense of image quality. Generally speaking, it was very interesting for me to discuss this with you, it is an invaluable best practice. It seemed to me that this discussion, this in itself looks like an art project. I understand perfectly well that AI images are not "all right" as it is possible, like you, I have viewed tens of thousands of such images adjusting them to make them better, but I also have a purely human problem. I know how to distinguish technical flaws from artistic ones, I don't mix them. I can see the beautiful in the ugly scribbles of AI and I think it's beautiful because that's what makes me human. In general, I don't have such a goal to sell this particular image. It was very interesting to get grades. I hope I'll get even better) @daniellei4510 respect and respect from me to you ) And how can someone tell me how to close the post?

And how can someone tell me how to close the post?

By @SQuark33343832

You can't. You can mark answers as correct. That's all. With your current rank, you even can't edit own posts to correct typing mistakes.

T

TK Venom3099486788w9

New Participant

Bug

Abambo

Community Expert

Bug

By @TK Venom3099486788w9

Why this nonsense answer here?

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

O

oleschwander

Brainiac

I think it gets rejected because her entire front part is indistinct. And also the reflection of her hair.

S

SQuark33343832Author

Participating Frequently

Yes, I already understood just the wording "QUALITY ISSUES" was incomprehensible, but now I realized that it should have been more like "Artifacts" -- Although I like them. )

Abambo

Community Expert

Yes, I already understood just the wording "QUALITY ISSUES" was incomprehensible, but now I realized that it should have been more like "Artifacts" -- Although I like them. )

By @SQuark33343832

Artifacts are technical issues, but technical issues may be more: blurry image, bad geometry with generative AI, white balance, … Exposure is a frequent issue with photographs, generative AI.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

daniellei4510

Community Expert

See attached. There may be other things I missed. Now I need to get back to fixing whatever is wrong with the 4 rejections I myself woke up to this morning. 🙂

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.

S

SQuark33343832Author

Participating Frequently

I don’t understand at all, your complaints are not about quality but about artistic content, the fact that she is half-human, half-robot - it’s obvious that she’s half-dead, half-dead - it’s obvious that there are pieces of garbage floating in the water, too, that there is air in her mouth with air . Well, this is absurd, I can draw such squares on any image and write something.

daniellei4510

Community Expert

Hey, you certainly have the option of ignoring our suggestions for improvement. You asked specifically, "Explain in more detail." Hence, the "boxes." The bottom line is, your image was rejected. And it will remain rejected until you fix any issues and resubmit it. Think like a moderator and become your own harshest critiic. Sorry I took the time to try to help you.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.