Participant

Answered

AI Generated Images Not Marked as Such?

Forum|Forum|3 years ago
December 6, 2022
8 replies
7600 views

In an online discussion about AI generated images and how Adobe Stock is now accepting them someone linked to a portfolio of a person who has publicllly stated that they are submitting AI images to Adobe Stock.

There was also a link to Adobe Stocks info on submitting AI images, which states,

" Label, title, and tag content as Generative AI illustrations.
To properly review your content and surface it to customers, clearly label content that has been made using generative AI tools. Only content that has been properly labeled can be selected for inclusion in content highlight galleries, customer research requests, and other promotional materials. Identify any generative AI art as illustration, even if it looks like a photograph - only content primarily created using a camera can be submitted as photos."

But this person does not have anything labeled as AI in their portfolio. At a glance one might think many of them are photographs. With some though, close inspection mistakes can be seen that show it is AI generated. Like this Santa. Look closer at the skiis--they're not right. But there are also a couple other issues with it.

https://stock.adobe.com/images/santa-claus-skiing-winter-fun-christmas/549864842

This is not only an issue with it not being labeled as AI work, it's also a quality issue. Adobe Stock is supposed to have quality images, and this Santa is mostly good--but the skiis are a big flaw in my opinion. So I think Adobe employees need to take extra care when examining images to be accepted for such flaws.

I don't have a problem with AI images--as long as they are clearly labelled, so I hope Adobe can contact this contributer and get them to label their AI images correctly.

Correct answer Contributor1

Thanks. Some of that, at least, is of doubtful quality. @Contributor1 ?

Hello, yes these accounts may need futher scrutiny. I've passed on the report to the content team for review. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the assets.

D

defaultnhpo25mrc9lj

Participating Frequently

Just wanted to post a comment on here to express that this issue is still not solved and causing delays in my work. Even six months ago, I could use search on Adobe Stock and get fairly relative results, but now almost every other image is AI generated and many aren't labeled as such. We need a filter just for AI art, and there needs to be a better review before content becomes available to paying customers. If I have to waste any more time filtering through uncanny valley lasagnas, I'm going to lose it and look into taking my business to a stock site that's a little more restrictive with AI art. It has a place and a purpose, but we should be able to decide if we see it.

Abambo

Community Expert

@defaultnhpo25mrc9lj ,

Use “-ai” in your search terms. That will avoid all conforming assets.

Generative AI is new and so many contributors see it as a manner to generate fast pictures, but they do not keep in mind, that still they need to conform with the quality requirements. Unfortunately, the moderators were unprepared for the first wave of assets. So many passed that should not have passed. We see many refusals for AI-generated assets in the contributor forum, and many of those contributors asking questions did not inspect their assets correctly before submitting, or they would not have submitted them. Submissions get in a different moderation queue, I suppose, with specifically trained moderators for this. We see that because only submitters with generative AI assets see a considerable slowdown in the moderation speed, so there is a bottleneck. All contributors need to set now a flag, and they have to add certain criteria to their title and keywords (from the submission guidelines for contributors):

Include "generative AI" in the title of ALL images (in English) in which all or part of the file was created with generative AI software.
- This includes composites with multiple asset types
Include "generative AI" as a single keyword (in English regardless of language you are keywording in)
Include "generative" as a single keyword
Include "AI" as a single keyword

We can hope that the situation will improve soon, with:

filters for generative AI assets.
and better quality assets.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

EkorrenHJ

Participating Frequently

This doesn't solve anything though due to the sheer number of non-conforming assets. Try searching for "sci-fi soldier -ai." There's a good chance that nearly every single search result you get is ai generated, despite none of them taggit it as such.

V

vanessaw35923482

Participant

This seems to be a very common thing where ai prompters submit works without labeling them as ai. This is especially annoying when looking for vector images as they tag the images as being vector but when you download the images its just converted jpgs. Also im convinced they all watch the same tutorials as their work is almost identical - one does waterpaint effect they ALL do water paint effect. Starting to think it might be a better idea to just invest in an ai software program for images rather than stock sites. Here are some more that dont label their work as Generative AI illustrations but which clearly are:
https://stock.adobe.com/uk/contributor/211040254/fortis-design?load_type=author&prev_url=detail

https://stock.adobe.com/uk/contributor/211030798/zaleman?load_type=author&prev_url=detail

https://stock.adobe.com/uk/contributor/208278073/crocothery?load_type=author&prev_url=detail

https://stock.adobe.com/uk/contributor/211164139/zedtox?load_type=author&prev_url=detail

https://stock.adobe.com/uk/contributor/211177605/mashita?load_type=author&prev_url=detail

https://stock.adobe.com/uk/contributor/211105496/tj-barnwell?load_type=author&prev_url=detail

https://stock.adobe.com/uk/contributor/205781478/travel-drawn?load_type=author&prev_url=detail

https://stock.adobe.com/uk/contributor/209695830/la-cassette-bleue?load_type=author&prev_url=detail

https://stock.adobe.com/uk/contributor/211081979/badger?load_type=author&prev_url=detail

bloody hell they are everywhere, pretty much every second image you click on is likely to just be a prompt image...sigh

Abambo

Community Expert

I looked in your first link and random asset: marked as graphic resource and not as vector. It was a JPEG image. Graphic resources are not necessarily vector images.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

V

Vivoderm

Participant

Hello Abambo,

I am just curious...would you know if these MidJourney and Dall-E images are selling well? Or do so many people have access to the tools, that they are generating their own images now? I have been messing around with MidJourney and other Ai programs, and it is very difficult to get the same result with the prompts, or to make edits. The BOT can only generate images it had been fed or seen before. Hence, the similar syles keep popping up. Is it WORTH the effort these guys are putting in to stockpile thousands of "instant Ai" images? Where do you guys see this taking the future of Stock Imagery?

V

Vivoderm

Participant

TOTALLY AGREE. I'm very excited to play with Generative AI, and see where it can expand my art and what ideas it can help me generate, to tweak my drawings and illustrations, and maybe even build, etc. But THESE GUYS!?

https://stock.adobe.com/contributor/208557026/kris-kashtanova?load_type=author&prev_url=detail&asset_id=540873049

That's one CREEPY TURKEY! It has multiple weird legs and the skin seems to be "growing" into the cup - gross!

They are not even correcting these images or proofing them in any way. They just seem to be generating them - en mass and slapping them up online to sell as fast as possible. Page after page after page of BAD art.

https://stock.adobe.com/images/blanket-in-a-winter-cabin-generative-ai/548887156?prev_url=detail

The coffee cup is ALL jacked up and the blanket appeared to be shredded...

My only fear as an artist now, is if I DO have a drawing that takes me hours, or days or even weeks of work...HOW can it compete with someone who just SPOKE 3,000 images into existence?

EkorrenHJ

Participating Frequently

When searching things like gothic, sci-fi, or fantasy illustrations, the majority of art assets are unlabeled AI art. It's too much to even link individual contributors.

Abambo

Community Expert

The rules for marking AI have been laid out only recently, on December, 5th. Not all AI art can be marked for now. If you find AI art that is not matching the standard, you should denounce it here. If you do not do that, it can't be cured.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

EkorrenHJ

Participating Frequently

Okay. On a five second search for "gothic," I found five contributors who hadn't marked their art as AI generated:

https://stock.adobe.com/se/contributor/211079269/raven?load_type=author&prev_url=detail

https://stock.adobe.com/se/contributor/211108779/henry-letham?load_type=author&prev_url=detail

https://stock.adobe.com/se/contributor/211105496/tj-barnwell?load_type=author&prev_url=detail

https://stock.adobe.com/se/contributor/208278073/crocothery?load_type=author&prev_url=detail

https://stock.adobe.com/se/contributor/211150806/jovan?load_type=author&prev_url=detail

C

celester95267202

Participant

A well known insect photographer pointed out some AI generated fantasy ants not labeled as AI, so I started poking around that accounts image and found all sorts of bad animal images including this 6-legged "salamader." I also don't think this "photographer" has been to Antarctica to take just one photo of Emperor penguins. This garbage devalues every actual travel photographer's work.

https://stock.adobe.com/images/poisonous-wild-salamander-crawls-up-tree-clinging-to-its-paws/546953144?prev_url=detail

D

David27495045b7xq

Participating Frequently

I agree completely! I am on Adobe Stock specifically to find quality photography, not (checks site) penguins with three legs and no faces.

Abambo

Community Expert

Please find here a note for contributors concerning the submission of AI-generated images: announcing-the-adobe-stock-policy-on-generative-ai-content. Hopefully, this trend will slow down a bit. I also suppose that moderators get training to detect such assets with erroneous features. Some are easy to detect.

The 6 legged Salamander is gone. If you see such assets, denounce them here. If someone spams Adobe stock with badly generated AI art, I expect that account to be terminated.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

D

David27495045b7xq

Participating Frequently

Hi - I would also REALLY like to see better labeling of AI-generated art, so I can avoid it. My very first search of the day turned up an obvious (and terrible) example: Mail Clerks and Mail Machine Operators, Except Postal Service Fictional Work Enviroment Scene. Stock Illustration | Adobe Stock

As far as I can tell, it is not labelled as such - and the "artist", Replicant.Army, has an entire collection of (bad) AI art. If I wanted that, I'd generate it myself! It's below the quality standards of Adobe, and we really need better curation.

Jill_C

Community Expert

Ugh ! That really is ghastly. I wonder why it got accepted into the database...

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

D

David27495045b7xq

Participating Frequently

I believe the artist's entire catalog is similar, although some are better than others. This sloth with no feet is typical. Unau (Linnaeus’s Two-Toed Sloth) Animal. Illustration Artist Rendering Stock Illustration | Adobe Stock

Abambo

Community Expert

@Contributor1,

When I look at what scrutiny some other contributions are vetted, then I think that most of these Santa pictures should be checked again, and deleted from the database.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

C

Contributor1

Community Manager

Thank you all, I'll report this to the content team for a second review. I agree @Abambo, all assets deserve equal scrutiny.

Jill_C

Community Expert

I searched the portfolio of the artist you mentioned and did find AI and generative keywords on images. Perhaps they are in the process of updating their Portfolio to comply with the latest guidelines.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

I

iedreamsAuthor

Participant

That's great. Thank you. I think all of the ones that I looked at were not labeled. But now I see that if I search that portfolio for "ai" that I can find many. So I think you are right that they are updating things (which I would imagine would take some time).

mattb256

Participating Frequently

Can we get an additional subcategory for AI generative images?

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded