Re: Update submission

daniellei4510

Some people have been waiting as long as a year. But normal is a number weeks or months.

daniellei4510

That happens to me every day. It's the way things work now.

daniellei4510

Deleting and re-submitting MIGHT help, but there is no guarantee.

daniellei4510

This has been an issue for months. It has nothing to do with the "left behind" assets.

daniellei4510

Post 2 or 3 here. We will take a look.

daniellei4510

It is 7-10 BUSINESS days. Weekends and federal holidays do not count. Nor, I suspect, does the first day of withdrawal. You should expect payment early week.

daniellei4510

I see no advantage. There are other issues that need attention.

daniellei4510

These clumps, maybe? They look kind of random.

daniellei4510

You will always receive 33% of the price paid by the buyer. Different plans can cost more or less than the usual .99. On occasion, they can be as low as .24 up to $1.24 (guessing on that last figure, but it's around that much). Of course, buyers purchase an expanded license can net you around $24.00.

daniellei4510

Yep. Poor moderation. It happens all too often.

daniellei4510

Such a decision can depend on which moderator you get. Moderators are human and can make errors. Some are stricter than others. They make snap judgments, probably to fill a quota for the day, and have only a few seconds to select a reason for approval or refusal. And they can only pick one reason out of many, even when multiple issues occur.

daniellei4510

Meaningless text and various rendering issues. You should also submit images without transparency as jpgs, pngs.

daniellei4510

I fussed with some exposure, color, and dehazing filters in Camera Raw filter. Might help.

daniellei4510

gado3008: sun glare whitepeakcock: depth of field too shallow queenbutter: needs sharpening reptcheca: model release required hungria: depth of field too shallow; peppers in front should be in the sharpest focus in this case Just picked a few at random. Adobe Stock has very high standards compared to other stock sites. We get a lot of posts here from people saying along the lines of, "other stock sites and have accepted these and they have even sold." But that is not a guarantee Adobe will accept their assets.

daniellei4510

Makes sense. Not sure what the value of such photos would be, commercially speaking.

daniellei4510

You can't apply. Adobe would have to approach you first. I can only assume this can happen in one attends Adobe trade shows, does some pro-acctive networking, etc. Otherwise, I'm not sure how Adobe would be aware of your work. Just a guess.

daniellei4510

That's what the news media does. I can't imagine that being an issue. Best bet is to just give it a try.

daniellei4510

Unfortunately, there is nothing to be done. Contacting contributor support will simply result in a canned response. Your only options are to continue to wait, or delete the asset(s) and resubmit. But still no guarantee. Numerous contributors are experiencing this issue.

daniellei4510

I'd say it's a bit of a toss up between the released version of Photoshop and the beta. And neither in my opinion would be accepted. The issue is the object itself not having any well-defined edges. They are too rough to start with. While the background can be removed, the process can't fix the poorly rendered edges.

daniellei4510

The question is, could the individual recognize themselves, not necessarily whether other people would recognize them. An article of clothing, a hairstyle, the distance from, the time of the day the person might recall being in the spot or place when the photo was taken, etc. And the individual themselves? Would I go after someone using a photo of the back of my head commercially? No. Would someone else? Maybe. At least that's my take on the issue.

daniellei4510

This particular asset should not have been accepted due to rendering errors, particularly buttons, and the random addition of illogical objects. The clock face is poorly drawn as well.

daniellei4510

Random, imperfect rendering errors with the paper party favors.

daniellei4510

Thank you, I'll experiment with it.

daniellei4510 · ‎Mar 26, 2025

Yes, and marked as similar to other submissions (portraits). Four more today, as many as what were accepted, which were all abstract backgrounds.

daniellei4510 · ‎Mar 26, 2025

You don't need to give credit to the author, but given that it's on the cover, I suspect you will still need an extended license regardless.

daniellei4510 · ‎Mar 26, 2025

While it probably doesn't apply as much as it used to when it comes to AI, "garbage in, garbage out" might still be the case here, but try it and see. I'm not familiar with video AI upscalers.

daniellei4510 · ‎Mar 26, 2025

Good heavens, they were everywhere! (Note to self: don't critique images 5 minutes after waking up in the morning.)

daniellei4510 · ‎Mar 26, 2025

Glad to help. I know it's frustrating.

daniellei4510 · ‎Mar 26, 2025

At 100%, there are rendering issues with the hair and ear.

daniellei4510 · ‎Mar 26, 2025

Adobe at least offered you the opportunity to appeal, so you may wish to do so. But yes, Adobe is very strict with regard to IP violations, so the outcome may not be what you want to hear. https://survey.adobe.com/jfe/form/SV_a3iwQO3jp990k2W

daniellei4510

daniellei4510

Activity

Re: Update submission

Re: Update submission

Re: Update submission

Re: Update submission

Re: AI images rejected because of quality issues

Re: Payment Not Received

Re: Adobe stock, withdrawing specific amount of mo...

Re: Image Critique

Re: Sales expectations for AI generated stock phot...

Re: Rejected image . Automobile

Re: Why they rejected all my picutes?

Re: Rejected image . Automobile

Re: Non accepted photos

Re: Why they rejected all my picutes?

Re: Can a back of people photo be used for commer...

Re: 템플릿 기여 신청을 하고 싶은데 초대받는 방식 외에 방법이 있는지?

Re: Can a back of people photo be used for commer...

Re: Picture Review

Re: Before and after image previously rejected

Re: Can a back of people photo be used for commer...

Re: Sales expectations for AI generated stock phot...

Re: PNGs, Photos rejected , quality issues

Re: Before and after image previously rejected

Re: Continued Frustration with "too many similars"

Re: Purchasing of a image and license for book cov...

Re: Is this video is good to submit for commercial...

Re: Intellectual Property Concerns for Photos

Re: Demora en Revisión de imágenes

Re: AI Images Rejection

Re: Account disabled