Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi Guys,
I want to thank you for migrating to this new forum, I have worked on clearspace for a while and It is indeed a very robust collaboration/social networking framework,with very nice forum feature,
maybe you can enabled blogs for users in the future .?
anyways I have two thumbs but giving this move a 5 thumbs up.
Regards
Levan
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Who sacrificed for you to obtain the other 3 thumbs?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
levancho wrote:
Hi Guys,
I want to thank you for migrating to this new forum, I have worked on clearspace for a while and It is indeed a very robust collaboration/social networking framework,with very nice forum feature,
maybe you can enabled blogs for users in the future .?
anyways I have two thumbs but giving this move a 5 thumbs up.
Regards
Levan
Just because you type the words, it doesn't make it true.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The statement is part of the internet now so it has to be true.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
[personal attack removed]
Message was edited by: Jochem van Dieten
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
[personal attack removed]
Message was edited by: Jochem van Dieten
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Ann Shelbourne wrote:
[personal attack removed]
looool anna, you don understand that clearspace is not a company? But a product, I worked with clearspace means I have implemented it on several projects and have worked with its source, looool I don't work for jive, so please save your anger sore something else, or at least read the post completely befor bashing out
Message was edited by: Jochem van Dieten
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
No, your origional post said you worked "ON" clearspace and didn't say "WITH". Working on and working with are totally different concepts. That is why you received the lashout.
levancho wrote:
Ann Shelbourne wrote:
[personal attack removed]looool anna, you don understand that clearspace is not a company? But a product, I worked with clearspace means I have implemented it on several projects and have worked with its source, looool I don't work for jive, so please save your anger sore something else, or at least read the post completely befor bashing out
Message was edited by: Jochem van Dieten
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
dec9 wrote:
No, your origional post said you worked "ON" clearspace and didn't say "WITH". Working on and working with are totally different concepts. That is why you received the lashout.
levancho wrote:
Ann Shelbourne wrote:
[personal attack removed]looool anna, you don understand that clearspace is not a company? But a product, I worked with clearspace means I have implemented it on several projects and have worked with its source, looool I don't work for jive, so please save your anger sore something else, or at least read the post completely befor bashing out
Message was edited by: Jochem van Dieten
its all good guys [my rude reply removed]
I am not saying clearspace is the best,its just better than one I have seen before.
P.S: thruth to be told and .. its actually is a shame that the very best forum Software in the market currently is written in php
actually two of them
IPB and vbulletin
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I have to agree that clearspace is a memory hog and does require serious clastering architecture to be cosidere production quality, but hey why are getting angry at me, I just did acomparison , don't you remember half baked some fusion software that was before this forum? If you can't compare features than maybe spend little more time on it? Agan, I don't kniw what kindd of past discussions you had on this subject, but it does not take a highly intelligent pwrson to realize tha difference in features, on other hand I might not be as intelligent as you so please excuse my incompetence in this subject, compare to you
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
levancho wrote on 11/1/2009 8:01 PM:
I have to agree that clearspace is a memory hog and does require serious clastering architecture to be cosidere production quality
I do not think any version of Jive ClearSpace is mature enough to be
considered production quality.
Their backend looks nice enough, it follows all the right patterns to be
able to work well, and I think they designed it quite nicely to scale
very well. But essentially all they did there was string together proven
technologies from others. Spring, FreeMarker, Tomcat, Struts, Lucene,
Coherence, PostgreSQL etc. are all proven, production quality technologies.
The first problem lies in what they built on top of that. The user
interface is a pile of crap. It is totally dependent on javascript which
makes it terribly slow. There are considerable errors in the design of
the HTTP layer so the hit ratio on the browser cache is a joke. About
the only thing I like about their design is their choice of scalability
over single thread performance, e.g. the way they don't keep a server
side history but do that in cookies. And I am not even going to go into
the issues with the webservices and email integration, because that
alone is enough for a week of discussions.
The second problem is Jive as a company. From my experience with them I
would say they are immature and have grown to fast.
Their support is a joke, I have to explain to them how they set up these
forums. Not oncce, but three times. Even issues that are under a 1-hour
SLA take weeks before they acknowlege there is a bug. On issues they
don't follow the instructions to reproduce and then claim there is no
issue. Not to mention the times where they respond "we knew that bug
existed, we just didn't tell you". And that is not just support, their
development team also closes feature requests while implementing
something completely different then asked.
I can not detect any commitment to the quality of their products with
them. The only bugs in their product they actually fix in a reasonable
time are the ones where I threaten to publish exploits for their
security holes. Nor any commitment to work with people to sort out these
issues. (I have had an email conversations with their lead developer
where he claimed he was happy with their quality, I showed him how on a
project 86% of the invoked webservices malfunctioned and the other 14%
had incorret documentation, and suddenly he doesn't answer email anymore.)
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
well, to be completely fair, backend, specifically data access layer is not very *nice* .
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
levancho wrote on 11/1/2009 11:05 PM:
well, to be completely fair, backend, specifically data access layer is not very nice .
I was a bit surprised when I read you had to write SQL to access a
database ...
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
jochemd wrote:
levancho wrote on 11/1/2009 11:05 PM:
well, to be completely fair, backend, specifically data access layer is not very nice .
I was a bit surprised when I read you had to write SQL to access a
database ...
if you had looked into the source code of clearspace you would "exactly" know what I am talking about, but since you have not, I cant really explain that any better than this.
Regards
L
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
levancho wrote on 11/1/2009 11:42 PM:
if you had looked into the source code of clearspace you would "exactly" know what I am talking about, but since you have not, I cant really explain that any better than this.
They won't give me access so all I know about the CS sourcecode is from
two students I had when I was doing LiveCycle and Flex training in
India. They had both worked for one of Jive's integration partners. We
shared horror stories
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
They had both worked for one of Jive's integration partners.
company I worked for used to be one of those Jivesoftware Integration partners, and they did have ofshore resources in india hmmm.
anyways, my take on this is that if you build clearspace from source everything is in your hands and its not that bad as it sounds.
altough I dont understand why adobe choose clearspace and not straight jiveForum solution,
jiveForum seems to be more better fit, since they have disabled half of the features that are part of clearspace in here.
milliond $ Question: which other alternative you would have choosen?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
ok, lets open up some, can of worms,
try visiting this page http://forums.adobe.com/community/ (10 times )
it should always be slower than any other page,
that is directly related to how clearspace treats communities, and how code that runs behind works,
clearspace is a cache ( not money) machine, if it does not have anough cache to store all those community objects, it will flush it out and reload them on every request, so unless cache is highly optimized from admin section, this forum will always have performance issues
same goes for forum threads, discussions, replies, user counts and other frequently accessible items,each have seperate cache setting that has to be checked, and optimized, and overall server has to have huge cache settings to accomodate fast response, also java heap size haeve to be big anough otherwiss some friendly out of memory errors will start poping up. again, clearspace is build on asumption that there is big cache avaiable, and if (I hope it is) clustering is enabled via coherence than it has to be configured with cache sizes being quite large, and it will scale in paralel and *should *cough* in theory *cough* deliver stagering performance boost if configured correctly..
if this forum is deployed without coherence cache clustering than forget about scalability or performance , it will degrade even more.
.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
So your premise is that the cache is not optomized correctly thus causing issues.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
dec9 wrote:
So your premise is that the cache is not optomized correctly thus causing issues.
not 100% on this, but looks like it.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Did you ever check how many forums and sub-forums there are and how many messages per thread there can be?
These are not all your typical Q&A type threads.
Apart from picking the wrong software, adobe's mistake is trying to encompass too wide a ground centred on one base.
However, natural selection means that people are drifting away from the forums and eventually the situation will stabilise with smooth-running but virtually useless forums.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Smoke signals.
However, if Jive has the update (like 4.0 or something) and this update will fix some of the issues then just go for it and apply the update. Ya, I know it isn't that simple but my gosh just try for pete's sake.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Well if we didn't know it before, we know it now.
These forums are a disaster.
And it would appear the situation is beyond recovery.
What a surprise!
Rearrange the following into a common sentence: told – so – you – we!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Bless you!
While I may not like some of your decisions so far as the actual run of this particular forum. And You have seemed to mellowed somewhat.
At least I can agree with your perception of the ClearSpace/Jive setup. Now if you could place this assessment personally on the Desk of the President, CEO, and Board members with documentation of the complaints from all venues including FaceBook, Maybe we could get someone to come down hard on Jive give them 30 day to clean up their act. I've seen some phpBB forums that run better than this one. I am not speaking to the ability phpBB being able to work with a Forums this large. Just they appear to work better.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I am not speaking to the ability phpBB being able to work with a Forums this large. Just they appear to work better.
actually phpBB is very scalable, I have forum running on it ith some topics topping 800+ replies, and it works like a charm.
but again I have no comment regarding clearspace speed , its not fast,
but features: it does have all features that forum software needs.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I do not think any version of Jive ClearSpace is mature enough to be
considered production quality.
Their backend looks nice enough, it follows all the right patterns to be
able to work well, and I think they designed it quite nicely to scale
very well. But essentially all they did there was string together proven
technologies from others. Spring, FreeMarker, Tomcat, Struts, Lucene,
Coherence, PostgreSQL etc. are all proven, production quality technologies.
The first problem lies in what they built on top of that. The user
interface is a pile of crap. It is totally dependent on javascript which
makes it terribly slow. There are considerable errors in the design of
the HTTP layer so the hit ratio on the browser cache is a joke. About
the only thing I like about their design is their choice of scalability
over single thread performance, e.g. the way they don't keep a server
side history but do that in cookies. And I am not even going to go into
the issues with the webservices and email integration, because that
alone is enough for a week of discussions.
The second problem is Jive as a company. From my experience with them I
would say they are immature and have grown to fast.
Their support is a joke, I have to explain to them how they set up these
forums. Not oncce, but three times. Even issues that are under a 1-hour
SLA take weeks before they acknowlege there is a bug. On issues they
don't follow the instructions to reproduce and then claim there is no
issue. Not to mention the times where they respond "we knew that bug
existed, we just didn't tell you". And that is not just support, their
development team also closes feature requests while implementing
something completely different then asked.
I can not detect any commitment to the quality of their products with
them. The only bugs in their product they actually fix in a reasonable
time are the ones where I threaten to publish exploits for their
security holes. Nor any commitment to work with people to sort out these
issues. (I have had an email conversations with their lead developer
where he claimed he was happy with their quality, I showed him how on a
project 86% of the invoked webservices malfunctioned and the other 14%
had incorret documentation, and suddenly he doesn't answer email anymore.)
Great stuff!
(Who would've thought you were so much in agreement with us! )