30
Replies
Phillip, did you see my own tests, for wh
ich I posted a link? I'm beginning to think that nobody re
ads what I write here. 
Extra line breaks kindly provided by the non updated software of this site.
John Joslin wrote:
Well at least I do Claudio.
What I don't do is look at PJ's links since he stadfastly reuses to use the little camera icon to post screen shots – a matter of 10 seconds.
It would seem that you and I are the exceptions...
And I also avoid most of the time following Phillip's links. I am not sure if his way of including images is faster for him than the camera icon, but it certainly makes everyone else to unnecessarily waste time if we want to see them.
First Camera Button Limits severely the phyiscal size of image that can be viewed even if you click on it to expand it.
Second camera button compromises the quality of the image Makes it very fuzzy to look at.
Third the camera Icon depends up other screenshot techniques to actaully take the images, and Jing is the only thing I have found on a Mac That allows markup (arrows pointing the way comments ect).
As for time it takes only a split second to veiw the link and split seconf to hit your back button.
And finally I've pointed out over and over, If Screencast wasn't secure they couldn't provided the service.
I find people that refuse to try the link and doing this way at best paranoid.
The two images I made, camera would have made look like postage stamps and you wouldn't have been able to read the text of the button.
I am an geezer (61) and I am willing to try new things if it provides efficiency, easy of use both for me and the people am in contact with.
Although, I am not on these forums for points. I have noticed, since using this system. my points have climbed. So using this system must be doing some one some Good.
I will repost using Camera icon for those who refuse try anything new. You do know your doing the same with camera button only your using Adobe's server to show the image.
AdChoices