Skip to main content
Inspiring
May 24, 2009
Answered

Why can't we just have separate log ins and be done with this nonsense?

  • May 24, 2009
  • 8 replies
  • 14026 views

As the topic says...

This common login is supposed to be one reason why Adobe can't implement NNTP. But what function does it serve? I've commented in another thread, and below is more or less, what i said there...

That, i think, was the most assinine idea anyone ever came up with. I see no reason for not having separate log ins for store and forums / downloads. In fact, i can't think of one good reason to combine the two.

If i were a user of the Adobe store, i would definitely prefer to have a separate login and password for that area. I think most people would. I see a lot of aliases in the forums. In the store, you'd want to use your real name for tax and audit purposes. Moreover, what's to stop people creating two identities anyway? So, the whole purpose of a common id is meaningless.

Am sure, that even at this stage, it wouldn't be too difficult to separate the two. For instance, whenever i open the forums i see a welcome at the top of the screen. Right above 'Home'. Yet, i still have to login to the forums... what give? Idiotic.

Adding to the above, doing away with this single log in would also mean an end to this frustration of suddenly getting logged off, randomly staying logged in, etc., etc.

    This topic has been closed for replies.
    Correct answer Scott Falkner

    John Joslin wrote:


    Forum Ops: The people who were helping users are all leaving the forums!


    Adobe Management:  Whatever.

    Adobe Management: Fuck 'em. We already have their money.

    8 replies

    May 31, 2009

    this post from a friend pretty much sums it up...

    The 'logging out' thing is proving surprisingly off-putting thing for me. It logged me out, and it was five days before I cared enough to log in again. It's as though I keep getting told to go away; eventually I'll get the hint, I guess.

    http://forums.adobe.com/message/2001834#2001834

    doesn't matter that it was posted in the lounge, what matters is people are leaving all the forums.

    May 31, 2009

    Forum Ops: The people who were helping users are all leaving the forums!


    Adobe Management:  Whatever.

    Scott Falkner
    Community Expert
    Scott FalknerCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
    Community Expert
    June 1, 2009

    John Joslin wrote:


    Forum Ops: The people who were helping users are all leaving the forums!


    Adobe Management:  Whatever.

    Adobe Management: Fuck 'em. We already have their money.

    Ramón G Castañeda
    Inspiring
    May 27, 2009

    88 seconds just to get to this forum's main page, log in and get this reply editor to come up.

    Definitely not worth it.

    Kath-H
    Inspiring
    May 28, 2009

    The tone there seemed to be that if there's a way to make NNTP or

    similar option work, they will.

    No, I didn't see that at all. Hopeful noises about some Air thing but all very vague, and Murray in particular getting more and more annoyed about the loss of NNTP. No-one mentioned getting NNTP to work. Confirmation that it's possible with the new forums, no reason offered from 'on high' about why they don't want to use it any more, except minor stuff like edits not being seen via NNTP, but that's always been the case.


    I think these people were all from the Fusetalk side????

    May 28, 2009

    Kath-H wrote:


    I think these people were all from the Fusetalk side????

    They certainly mustered a mighty fine display of meaningless initials between them.


    (Obviously need to confirm their status somehow.)

    John T Smith
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    May 26, 2009

    About having different accounts and passwords...

    I don't know about the Mac world, but in the Windoze world, I stopped worrying about that a long time ago

    The current Norton Internet Security includes a password manager... I use one "strong" password to tell Norton I am me... and it manages an encrypted file of all of my login and password combinations for the sites I visit

    For those not using Norton, there is http://www.roboform.com/download.html - Free version password manager allows 10 web sites or $29.95 unlimited

    As that applies here... since it doesn't look like the Adobe process will be split, it would seem to me that a single password manager might be a good idea for anyone who visits a lot of sites that require logins

    May 26, 2009

    I think most people know about password managers.


    They don't stop you getting logged out and, as far as I know, they don't log in for you.


    So what's your point?

    Kath-H
    Inspiring
    May 26, 2009

    Or you could getamac with Keychain - but as JJ says, that's not the point.

    Inspiring
    May 26, 2009

    JayJhabrix wrote on 2009-05-24 08:05:

    This common login is supposed to be one reason why Adobe can't implement NNTP. But what function does it serve?

    It reduces the number of accounts people have to remember. I am very

    glad I do not have to have separate accounts for the Adobe site, the

    WebX forums, the Fusetalk forums, the Acrobat.com site, the

    Photoshop.com site, the trainers portal, the Community portal, the

    Partner portal etc.

    I remember the days those were all different accounts and I am glad they

    are gone. I can't wait until the prerelease site and the EDS site are

    fixed to work with the Adobe ID as well.

    Am sure, that even at this stage, it wouldn't be too difficult to separate the two.

    Technically that isn't really difficult. It is about as difficult as

    rewriting it from scratch to use proper, proven, cryptographically safe

    protocols that allow for differentiating the login timeout between

    different areas of the site, allow for cascaded trust levels (because

    you are logged in to the store and the store has high trust, you are

    logged in to the forums, but the low trust forums don't log you in to

    the high trust store), provide API access so we don't have to reverse

    engineer HTML junk etc.

    But separating them just isn't going to happen. And you know it isn't,

    because it isn't a technical decision but a policy choice. So I would

    very much appreciate if you stopped whining and detracting attention

    from issues that do stand a chance of changing.

    Jochem

    --

    Jochem van Dieten

    http://jochem.vandieten.net/

    Kath-H
    Inspiring
    May 26, 2009

    Jochem, the only reason (IMO) people persist with what you rather offensively describe as whining is that separating the log-in/IDs is the only way less technically qualified people than you, know of that the problem might be solved.

    I'm sure that people would quite happily live with a common ID - as long as they could have the 'levels of trust' you describe, so they could stay logged in to everything except the 'high trust' areas *all the time* - which is what the WebX people are used to.

    It's a perfectly reasonable 'policy decision' - *providing the system can still work as people want and expect*.

    If the policy cannot be satisfactorily implemented, there will inevitably be consequences that Adobe may, in the end, decide are not worth dealing with.

    The real heavy lifters in the forums save Adobe a ton of money in terms of customer support. If the bean counters can count, eventually they will have to acknowledge that.

    Inspiring
    May 26, 2009

    Kath-H wrote on 2009-05-26 06:54:

    Jochem, the only reason (IMO) people persist with what you rather offensively describe as whining

    I think I am being nice when I call it whining. Because the answer has

    been given, and is just not accepted. All fine with me, continue all you

    want about the subject for all I care, but opening thread after thread

    on the topic so you negate any possible filter people may have to filter

    out the messages and drown other topics in noise cold just as easily be

    called sabotaging. Not to mention opening all the "free points" topics.

    Jochem

    --

    Jochem van Dieten

    http://jochem.vandieten.net/

    kanguyen
    Adobe Employee
    Adobe Employee
    May 26, 2009

    The idea with having a single login between forums and the rest of Adobe.com was to provide a shared experience and tighter integration with other areas of the site. The points system is a good example of this - other community areas of Adobe.com leverage a points system for contribution/participation, and Adobe Forums are part of this overall program.

    When we were on the old forums, Macromedia/Fusetalk forums the common Adobe ID account for your login and password. If you were on Web Crossing, you had a completely different login/password that was separate from the Macromedia forums or anything else on Adobe.com. It didn't make any sense from a customer perspective to have two different accounts to access Adobe Forums. I know there were many of you who stayed almost exclusively on one side of the fence (Fusetalk/WebCrossing) so this really didn't seem like an issue, but for the average customer looking for help, it was confusing for them to know which login to use.

    The way WebCrossing accounts were managed was not ideal either - John had to manage lost passwords and general day-to-day account management himself. We had customers calling in asking for help logging in, and these would end up all going to John because they could not be managed like the rest of our Adobe.com accounts. Now - if you have trouble with your Adobe ID, you can reset your password or contact Customer Service for help. This removes an administrative burden from John and frees up his time to manage more important issues.

    Eliminating this confusion with the login and then consolidating all the forums onto a singular platform were key parts of our recent forums project. That said, I acknowledge that especially for those who were primarily Web Crossing users, losing the permanent login was a big change. The login/timeout behavior is still not working consistently for everyone and it is something we are actively working on. I realize many of you are frustrated and rightly so when you are losing content while posting and getting timed out while actively using Forums. We are definitely experiencing some teething troubles now that we're tied into using the Adobe ID for login, but we will get that resolved so that it's working more consistently and we are working towards ways to extend the timeout without compromising security for other areas of Adobe.com that are more sensitive (like the Adobe Store).

    Separating the login is not something we are currently considering. We've worked really hard to consolidate the accounts and all the forums together, and provide tighter integration with other areas of Adobe.com. The only analogy I can think of is that we really feel like you guys shouldn't have a dozen keys to get into a dozen doors, but that you should be able to use one key to get into Adobe regardless of which door or room you're going into.

    Hope that helps!

    Phillip M  Jones
    Inspiring
    May 26, 2009

    I don't necessarily want a shared experience. I don't want to log into Adobe.com (store) to gain access to to forums. the only time I need to log into adobe.com is if I am purchasing a product or downloading Flash player or some other player.

    And because of all this mixing and mushing and such, I have two accounts, I only need one. The one I am using now. The other is tied to the old Macromedia account.

    And after I am logged into Forum 20 minutes I am logged  out of adobe com in 20 minutes.

    Also because of this I have to deal with login in every day sometimes two and three times a day.

    Also because of this sometimes the counter doesn't have sense enough to know, I clicked on reply and after I construct a reply taking 10-20 minutes  to write,  especially in the Acrobat forum for Mac everything goes poof and receive a nasty message you are no permitted to post in this forum at this time. Turns out I've been logged out.

    The least you can do is have some code that notices click of reply and suspends log out until about 30 seconds to a minute after the post command has been clicked.

    Then someone won't swear at the computer and throw against wall after spending time constructing an answer and all is lost.

    And who's to say because you have a different login server for each that two department have to handle, one department can handle two.

    I understand your corporate logic in your reply . But you (adobe) don't understand our customer logic wanting them un-tied. We feel if they were separated some of our problems with the forums might disappear

    Claudio González
    Legend
    May 24, 2009

    I normally don't like saying "I told you so", and I normally don't, but...


    Shortly after Adobe stepped back from the last fiasco, we began hearing rumors about uniforming the looks of all the Adobe sites. Wanting to know what could be waiting for us, I began visiting the ex MM forums. To my surprise, I found that I had to log in them using my Adobe Store username and password, and I also found that I never remained logged in those forums for more than perhaphs a couple of hours (I never measured this time). I therefore came to the Suggestions for the New Forums thread (I don't recall by now the exact name of that now vanished thread), and wrote a message telling about this login problem, and strongly suggesting that the login procedure for the new forums was kept completely separtate from the Adobe Store one.


    Some other people from "this side" (ex Adobe forums) also noticed this logout problem at "the other side" (Kath, I seem to remember you were one of them), but after many workrounds were posted, I finally remained as the one poster affected by it. Fearing that this could make my more important request to be forgotten, during the next months (more than a year?), I posted it several more times as a separate suggestion: please keep the login procedure to the new forums completely separate from the one of the Adobe Store. Unfortunately, and as so many excellent suggestions posted in that thread by many other people, it was not taken into account.


    By the way, in those months I could also observe how the format of the Adobe Store site became more and more loaded with needless additions, like "fancy" gray backgrounds, large black boxes, and the like; and how many of these additions were carried over to "the other side". Which wouldn't have been so bad if loading times hadn't increased accordingly. My posts asking for the format of the new forums to be kept as simple as possible, though echoed by many, were also ignored, but then this is another story. Or is is?


    To end this already too long post: during the test period, I was one of the many who warned repeatedly of the danger of losing many of the most valuable collaborators of these forums because of the incredible slowness  and poor functionallity of the new design. You may blame it on my aging memory if I am wrong, but I could swer that I read more than once semi official replies in the sense that this was a calculated risk of Adobe, and that any loses, however regretable, would soon be replaced by new users.

    Scott Falkner
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    May 24, 2009

    There really should be laws against being this bucket stupid. Maybe now that Goob and Chaney are out...

    Chris Cox
    Legend
    May 24, 2009

    "In fact, i can't think of one good reason to combine the two."

    Because you don't have all the facts, much less all the plans.

    It makes sense.

    NNTP has a few dozen things going against it, and login creditentials are the least of it's problems.

    Harbs.
    Legend
    May 24, 2009

    Chris Cox wrote:


    NNTP has a few dozen things going against it, and login creditentials are the least of it's problems.

    Chris,

    Are you able to explain what some of the other issues are?

    Harbs

    Phillip M  Jones
    Inspiring
    May 28, 2009

    Kath-H wrote:

    I found that 'because I say so' didn't cut it with my kids beyond the age of about four, when they learnt to use their brains in the form of verbal reasoning.

    Maybe I am missing something, but I didn't change logins or anything... didn't the WebX forums use the same login as the store?  If WebX did it I don't see why now it's all Jived up with this new software.


    Ansury wrote:

    Kath-H wrote:

    I found that 'because I say so' didn't cut it with my kids beyond the age of about four, when they learnt to use their brains in the form of verbal reasoning.

    Maybe I am missing something, but I didn't change logins or anything... didn't the WebX forums use the same login as the store?  If WebX did it I don't see why now it's all Jived up with this new software.

    Nope.

    When you logged on  to webX. You were not logged into adobe.com (store) and unless for some reason you desired to Logg out. as long as the set cookie was there. You could be logged in for 20 -30 years even through many shut downs of your computer. I know until they started messing with combining the Macromedia Groups and Adobe groups I had been singned in for two or three years or more.

    May 24, 2009

    The very fact that your comment is reasonable and logical means that it has zero chance of being considered by the "management" of Adobe.