P: Error at loading of ippCV library

@DGrainger 
CC @JeffreyTranberry 

No you do not understand about what we are talking here
Its a shame for Adobe not to be able to support older CPU.
As I wrote in a former answer
https://feedback.photoshop.com/conversations/photoshop/photoshop-error-at-loading-of-ippcv-library/5f8f06c2c17a06631eb72c7e?commentId=5f90263f6880ca6552561c56&replyId=5fc74bfe9d08861803366e98
There are only  6 instructions sets (sse4.2 comparing to SSE4.1)  to be implemented by software in case of missing cpu instruction sets.

And you are always answering the same things defending Adobe.
This behaviour of Adobe  is a no go,  particularly with regard to  enviromental aspects.
A lot of electronic waste would be created if all user are forced to buy new machines, instead Adobe is fixing this little problem .

Adobe might have a technical lead - today - but the open source community is cathing up.

I am using Linux because of a similar Microsoft behaviour, and I am using a VM with Windows only for the Adobe products.
Adobe Premiere Pro is loosing the lead against Blender including the satisfaction of the users, and Gimp adds more and more features, f.e.

Guys like you and the Adobe Coder will accelereate the developements of the opens source community. And you can be sure that the open scource community would have been fixed the SSE4.X problem in beetween two days.

Do you now know, about we are talking here?

@shad0w 

Thank you very much for the fix, it worked fine for me up to PS 22.1.1. Updating to PS 22.2 offers a new problem: PS does not start and shows the following error message:

@shad0w I did all the instructions and it didn't work for me, is there another step that I am missing?
or I'm just dumb?

Obviously you still do not understand what I wrote. Sorry, but this dialogue is not going anywhere useful.

@DGrainger

""Progress works upwards and for the better, not downwards for the poorer"".

It is your phrase, that progress is not for the poorest and that this is fine, do not try to justify something else with vain words.
Another: the software works well for me, only that your comment is agressive with those who do not work for 'being poor'
And why are you a coward? Well, because you hide behind a rule when you don't like an answer after launching your contempt towards others.

see you never

@shad0w you're a life saver.. 😂 

@pepelpz: I think that you have totally misunderstood what I wrote! As a result, all of a sudden you have jumped into accusations and class envy!   When I said Poorer, I meant that the Product Quality trend is not towards Poorer Quality. It has absolutely nothing to do with YOU nor your income!  Nobody suggested discriminating against someone for being poor until you did.

Once more: the computer does not give a hoot about the income of its owner.  If the computer is old and not up to running the newer software, that has absolutely nothing to do with you.

Also, once again, kvetching about not being able to run new software on outdated hardware is a waste of time because it is a denial of fact, the fact that the computer cannot do what requires more modern components.

Curious about you new ad hominem attack: how am I a coward because you don't understand that fact?

@DGrainger In other words, you discriminate against someone for being poor and then you hide behind the rules. You are also a coward.

@pepelpz:

For your information, what you just wrote is called an ad hominem attack, which is prohibited on this forum.