Feature Requests

Hello I have an idea about slightly different way of White Balancing: 1. suppose we have photographed a human head in several different light scenarios with varying light color 2. we have also photographed neutral gray patch in one of those photos to reach correct WB for this particular photo 3. now we could use the new tool [let's call it 'Color Anchor'] which works this way:a) we sample color of the skin on the forehead of this human and ACR gets color data, eg. RGB(200, 153, 129) [#c89981]b) we then 'lock this color' in this toolc) next we take another photo of this human and click with this new tool and its locked color on the foreheadd) now since this is the same human and the same forehead - we can reach the same colors and WB by applying WB transformation from 'Color Anchor' tool   I have no doubts it could be valuable for almost everyone since WB is very important when developing RAWs. cheers,Sempoo

Hello, When using Ccamera raw I have two options when ready with the adjustments: And I have the Dutch version: OPEN/OPEN and it opens the picture in Photoshop GEREED/READY and it closes the picture and saving the adjustments. After this you can proceed with selecting pictures in Bridge.   The shortcut on the mac keyboard for OPEN is the "press ENTER", but what is the shortcut for GEREED/READY? Seems it's not available and I need it to program my Loupdeck keyboard. So vote for this.

Hello! My name is Adrian and I have been retouching photos for other photographers for many years. I have realized that the most time consuming process of processing each photo in camera raw is straightening the photos. Not all photographers are able to take photos with a straight horizon, many take 90% of the photos crooked. With artificial intelligence it is not currently possible to add a button to automatically straighten the photos? The function of drawing a line on the horizon on a 13-inch screen, with the effect of un-zooming the photo to straighten, makes it very inaccurate on a small screen. I think it would be a good idea and would save many photographers and retouchers a lot of time. Thank you.

In camera raw filmstrip, if you have many files open, it would be very usefull with an automatic indicator that shows which files have been saved after editing so you will not save more than once if forgetting to mark them manually. I Know that i can give them a label after saving, but it would be much easier with a automatic marking.

Work lost. I was doing a complicated set of masks in PhotoShop Camera Raw (14.3) and was getting very happy with the results. I would say the image had about 15-20 minor tweaks to the mask and I had spent an hour or so getting it to that point.    Then I must have hit a key or done something similar as the entire image returned to its base state with the exception of a simple subject mask (even the mask name reset).    That is when I started to look for a undo or history to reverse the "whatever" I had done. I had not made any snapshots or saved any settings at this point. After chatting with a tech it became clear I was out of luck and would just have to start over. It never occurred to me there would not be a history of the ability to do a series of undos (this is all within the Camera Raw module).  The tech suggested to me that I post this experience and put it on the wish list.  So here it is, A way to recover from an error in the PS Camera Raw module

[This post contains formatting and embedded images that don't appear in email. View the post in your Web browser.]   The Cameras Supported By Camera Raw page incorrectly shows that the newly added OM Digital Solutions OM SYSTEM OM-1 doesn't have camera-matching profiles available: But in fact, LR shows camera-matching profiles available for this sample OM-1 raw:   See here for someone confused by this:  https://community.adobe.com/t5/camera-raw-discussions/p-raw-file-support-requests-and-information-new-camera/m-p/12854482#M17719 

The new enhanced profiles can include LUTs, but the most common color space for existing LUTs, Rec 709, is omitted: There are thousands of Rec 709 LUTs available for video color grading, and allowing Rec 709 LUTs in enhanced profiles would let people achieve the same look for their video and still images.Note that it would be necessary to include two versions of Rec 709 for gamma 2.2 and 2.4, since those are both widely used.

REQUEST: Add a "Copy/Paste Name" function to the presets!   REASON:  Being able to copy/paste the name of the preset in Camera Raw into the PS layer after you open an image is important.  How can you remember later what preset you used to open the image?  You get a nice result and later you want to remember what preset that was... There currently is no simple way. PROBLEM: Currently it is very convoluted and troublesome to copy the preset name - and a little dangerous.  You have to right click, get the drop-down submenu, then hit "Rename Preset", then go to the dialog box to rename the preset, then carefully select the preset name - being careful not to accidentally erase it, then "Copy", then hit "cancel", then paste the name of the preset into the layer after you open it! Whew!   SOLUTION: A simple "Copy Preset Name" function added to the right click menu would be tremendously useful!  Alternatively, just to be able to double-click on

It would be very helpful if it would be possible to change the grid color in the crop tool the same way you can change the "Mask Overlay Color".

I miss the abillity to change the previews of the pressets bij navigating with the down or up arrow. It's a strain on my hands when i have to hover/glide over the many options. Now i have to use the pen(wacom) or the mouse and this causes nerve pains in my hands to make those tiny precision movents or to hold it for a while on the same spot for longer time when to decide . I often decide not to use it and the arrows while make it more enjoyable for me and i think many others so can you help me.

Please add vector shapes with variable feathering to the local correction tools. Filling in shapes with the adjustment brush all the time is just not much fun and makes it harder than necessary to make changes afterwards.

Can we have an improved zoom for Lightroom? At the moment you can pick 1, possibly 2 and then the toggle jumps around between 100%, fit, fill and whatever you have selected.With the advent of the radial tool, there is often the need to zoom out to 1/8 or even 1/16th.Photoshop has a great zoom, press a key and roll the mouse, how about implementing something like that, even if it has to do discrete steps300%, 200%, 100%, fill, fit, 50%, 25%, 12% 6%, that would be perfect.If there are logistical issues with the mouse wheel, how about actually making the CMD + and CMD - that is the current zoom actually work properly.This would be a worthy improvement for LR4 to LR5.

Now that Photoshop CS6 has a nice dark interface, Camera Raw should follow suit for the same reason: to focus on the photo itself. (Also, dark interface looks cool.)

Having the adjustment brush within the mask menu adds additional clicks and it's frustrating that I have to reselect the brush tool when I go to the next picture.  This slows workflow.  There should be the option to separate specific mask options to a solo click on the panel.

As someone who uses both Camera Raw and Lightroom, having the C key as crop tool in CR and compare images in LR (whereas R rotate images in one while being the crop tool in the other) drives me insane daily, and I can't be the only user with this experience.   Assigning shortcut keys ourselves like in PS would be the best but even making both of them C, or R (or whatever third key), do the same thing would be very welcome.

As many are probably aware, today we have quite a few cameras that can take multiple shots and store them in single RAW file. Either for exposure stacking or for pixel shifting.   What would be good feature would be to have ability to split those files into individual DNG files, given sometimes one wants either only one frame, or needs to merge those files for HDR "by hand".   DNG files should preferably be truly RAW, meaning non-linearised, since that allows most of non-destructive post-processing.   Anyway, thanks for keeping Adobe DNG converter alive and up-to-date. Its really helpful tool and I think DNG actually is starting to be very useful format.   Btw. ability to bake-in your own DCP profile into DNG would be kinda great too.   Thanks for reading.

This is a need that is way overdue for Camera Raw and it's in Lightroom:  Please add a center marker on Crop & Rotate and on the Grid Overlay.

I recently converted a Nikon camera to infrared. Adobe's dng profile editor appears to be the only way to get infrared white balancing to work in the raw editor as well as light room classic . I have a lot of OCD related anxiety and after seeing how old the dng profile editor is, I have been having panic attacks about it eventually being neglected and becoming obsolete. Can you comment on Adobes future investment in the dng profile editor. Also do you know of a more up to date system for extending white balance in the raw. Thank you for your help. 11:51 AM

It would be great if one could output raw linear tiffs from a raw file. That is a file with no adjustments in exposure or curves but can utilize the lens profiles. Anyone think of a way to bypass the auto-correction to exposure in ACR?

Hi Adobe engineering team,    It would be great if you could make a Beta of the DNG Converter which adds support for the Canon EOS R3.(Like you did last year for the R5/R6)   Kind regards, Henrik Beckheim

It is rather strange to put this into this forum as a request or a subject to discuss, but it seems the ADOBE way.Until some time ago, I could change the image size in Camera Raw in the specs with a short- just below the image. You still can. What is no longer working today is a preview in Camera Raw based on this image size change. It was removed with a new version, or as I see it, somebody killed it by mistake.This little feature entirely made sense. I either preview images I would adjust for web in a small pixel size or interpolate pictures for print and adjust the noise level in Camera Raw. All this mainly on many images.Now we have to open each image to see how the adjustments translate to the needed size.PLEASE ADOBE....BRING IT BACK!! THX

Hi, now that 3D camera's are everywhere and JPS is the standard, is there anyway we can get Photoshop Elements Organizer to allow JPS files?A JPS file is literally a renamed JPEG file but it has 2 images side by side (so it's twice the width of a 2D version) so there's no issues with Organizer reading the file as it's basically a jpeg but I take hundreds of photos and I don't want to rename them all to jpeg because the files then don't display properly on a 3D viewing device.

Currently in ACR, there is only one set of settings that applies to all three of the adjustment tools: Brush, Radial, and Gradient.  If you adjust settings in one tool, then select a different tool, the settings will be the same as what you selected for the previous tool.   This doesn't make sense to me.  I use each of these tools for very different purposes.  Settings for one adjustment tool are completely different from settings for the other tools.  It would make much more sense to have separate settings remembered for each separate tool.  Then when I edit several similar images, the settings I used in the previous image for each of the tools will default to what I used for that specific tool on the last image.   This should be a very simple add.

I have an Apple Magic Mouse, which lets me use its upper surface as a trackpad. In older versions of ACR, scrolling with the mouse panned the open image the same way it still does in Photoshop. Starting in 2020, scrolling the mouse in ACR began changing the spot-removal brush size and adjustment brush size instead of panning the open image. I want mouse-scrolling behavior to go back to the way it was in ACR and still is in Photoshop. (Oh, sweet consistency!) Why can't Adobe give me the option in ACR to have mouse scrolling work the way it used to, which is the way I want it to? I searched and found this problem raised in forums in 2020, but as far as I can tell Adobe still hasn't provided that option.

I have an Apple Magic Mouse, which lets me use its upper surface as a trackpad. In older versions of ACR, scrolling with the mouse panned the open image the same way it still does in Photoshop. Starting in 2020, scrolling the mouse in ACR began changing the spot-removal brush size and adjustment brush size instead of panning the open image. I want mouse-scrolling behavior to go back to the way it was in ACR and still is in Photoshop. (Oh, sweet consistency!) Why can't Adobe give me the option in ACR to have mouse scrolling work the way it used to, which is the way I want it to? I searched and found this problem raised in forums in 2020, but as far as I can tell Adobe still hasn't provided that option.