Feature Requests

I like to color change or color match using the HSB method and color samplers.   By default, every time I create a new color sampler, the info panel color values show me RGB values. I would like to have an additional specification on the info panel preferences, allowing me to choose the value kind I want to see (avoiding selecting it every time there is a new color sampler).In my case, I would like to have always HSB values showing up, not RGB. #colorsampler #infopanel #HSB 

25.4.0 Mac OS As the title says. I really, really miss doing quick path changes/adjustments and having the droptool show up when I use pen/path tools and try my auto-reflex shortcuts makes little sense. Also happy new year! \o/

I have a suggestion: Is it possible to provide more than one method of payment for Adobe programs such as PayPal or instapay .. etc., as I cannot pay using the existing methods ?

I print many images every day that are all different, but must all be the same size for printing. As it stands, when placing an image into a frame, the aspect ratio is mantained at all times and therefore, sometimes the image will be partially obscured behind the frame (when the image ratio doesn't match that of the frame exactly). By adding this feature, when toggled, placing an image into a frame would stretch (or shrink) the image (breaking aspect ratio if need be) to fill the frame edge to edge. This would allow very fast workflow, simply dropping the image into the frame, and clicking print. Canva already has a feature like this that makes mass production very easy and fast when printing large quantities that all must be a certain size. Simply drop the image into the frame, and boom, the image has filled out the frame exactly and is ready for print. No transforming, no scaling, no snapping to guides or dragging corners. 

   Could we have a special blend mode  you  typiclly could find in  compositing software  . Depth combine . deep combine , Height blend   whatever they call it.    You can find a formula in Blender compositing nodes  but basically  its like  "lighter"  or "Max"  blending mode  which outpit a mask  where  pixel of layer 1 is higher than layer2 .     Typically it's just (layer1 max layer2)-layer1 and some treshold on top of it  .  Perfectly  re-creatable  in Photoshop  by  doing a special clipping group stack .     But wouldn't it be much easier and convenient to just have a special blending mode doing so.

I love  erase blend mode  in Affinity photo. You can do clipping be groups  in Photoshop  but erase mode is so  much easier in many cases and can replace a whole  stack  of clipping groups sometimes. Would also be nice to have  special custom blend modes with access to other layers pixel information .   So instead of doing  complicated groups  of stacked layers  clipping something,  something we sometimes  could't figure out a thing about  just next day, we could just  make an expression :  (Layer1 max layer2) -layer1   for a mask .   Or maybe a displace layer which  using  R and G for vector and B for distance  from an image bellow working on the fly  by an expression .   It could simplify  layer stacks tremendously  and be something having usual advantages of layers and still a bit of flexibility of nodes .   Start with erase

Hey, so I was just checking my credits, and they went much faster then I thought. I found out that for every "load more" that's a credit?!?!   I understand to a point, but when I get results that puts a LIZARD in someone's hair, or adds a creepy claw to something, why should we be charged? It's like it's still in Beta at times....  I feel like there needs to be something changed so we only are charged for the USEABLE options, OR fix the commands so that we aren't getting bad results... I send in feedback all the time, but not sure if it's helping.  

I've grudgingly accepted the Contextual Task Bar now that I've trained it to stay out of the way, and started exploring how it can assist my workflow. I like that when I'm working with text, I have quick access to font, size and color, and I can see how adding too many more options to the task bar would start to hamper its utility. That said, when I'm working within a a single block of text, the most likely change I'll make to a particular word or passage is making it italic or bold. In fact I need to do this often enough that I created a post about it—the question is, would it streamline anybody else's workflow, or am I just a freak?

Having sbsar as filter over smart object is cool   but is not good enough . We need something like live filters in Affinity Photo.  I often use Photoshop to edite and composite  height maps  and  to see what you are doing you need some  real time preview .   A normal map or just live  bump lighting .   The current embos fx  doesn't help much with that .     Please Adobe make embos FX working over heigh image .    Curently it works only in 32 bit mode  and looks  not very good .  Blurry and stepped.     Let's fix it that way it would work not over layer alpha but rather intensity.   

J'ai une idée pour vous qui je pense serait simple a mettre en place et très utilie pour de nombreux utilisateurs.Créer une petite case à la création d'un calque dans photoshop (MJ/CTRL N) où l'on peut dire le nombre de calque que l'on veut créer.Exemple je travaille dans le textile et fait x calques par création d'illustration pour bien séparer mes couleurs. A chaque fois je dois répéter l'opération de création de calque. En seulement 2 clics j'aurai directement les calques nécessaire.En gros :Est ce que quelqu'un sait ou on peut soumettre cette idée ? Ca serait tellement un gain de temps pour de nomnbreux utilisateurs !Merci !

The new lightroom feature Point Colour is incredibly powerful. While the photoshop HSL adjustment layer is more powerful than the lightroom HSL adjustments, I think having a point colour adjustment layer in photoshop would still be very useful for touching up colours

hello there, I want to say that adobe photoshop is the best tool for graphics designer and I'm using it for 5 years. But there is something I don't like about photoshop or some other software of adobe. It changes shortcuts like for redo shortcut was [ctrl + shift + z] but in some version. It is different. It reduce the efficiency. I want you that never change the shortcut of Photoshop. I'm really looking forward for your reply.Thank you.

Can someone please tell me why I can't use letters as a shortcut key for Application Menu and Panel Menu? Or is it just how Photoshop works? Because in CSP, I can use the keyboard letters on any tool that I want. This is pretty annoying since I use some of my pentab's buttons and dial for the shortcuts in CSP. But if I can't do the same in Photoshop, then it'll be a big problem. Please help.

Hello, currently I'm testing Adobe Firefly within Photoshop. It would be more convienient to see the use of credits within the tool instead of having to login at the Adobe.com page all the time to check how much credits are still available. It would be also fair, if there is an error and nothing was KI generated due to it, that I don't have to pay a credit for it. Often the generated pictures/expantions are not usable because they don't fit to the rest of the picture or they lack in quality, but it still costs credits. Sure currently we have a lot KI credits to use per month but it is still not fair. It is also not possible to recreate the same generated picture. Sometimes we use pictures still with watermarks on it for testing purposes and if we decided which picture we gonna use, we buy it. And the KI is not able to recreate the exact alteration on the now bought picture. Would be nice to be able to "mark" an alteration. I know it might be a bit difficult to accomplish.

hello.It takes a lot of time to import and render video files in PhotoShop (e.g. it takes 5 hours to render a 4K video 15min file in MacStudio Ultra).I would like to render using Media encoder, but PhotoShop does not allow rendering of videos using Media encorder.So, my request for improvement is that Media encoder be improved so that it can be used when rendering video in PhotoShop.Currently, the CPU & GPU are not effectively utilized when rendering video in PhotoShop (as observed by the CPU Performance Monitor).The reason for this request is that I would like to use the Dehaze function in CameraRAW, which can be read from PhotoShop, for video.Or, I would like to be able to use Camera RAW from Premiere Pro, or add the ability to use Defaze effects directly from Premiere Pro.

Isnstead of all those "neural filters" I tried  and never found doing anything useful for me as well as this glorious  "generate" button  please spend some time to make java script writing AI  for Photoshop.   To help us  to  get rid of annoying routine  Photoshop so full of.       Something  I would instruct like:   "crop  the image to all those paths saved in Path panel ,  and save those  selected layercomps for each crop as tga  files in destination folder pasting alpha1 from layercomp named alpha in those having "_a "  in layercomp name. or   "make those linked  smart objects  show their alpha 1 of linked files, or red channel" .or    "build a layer stack of clipping groups   using those selected smart objects as clipping ones"  or    "relink selected  smart objects  to sourse files of

Es wäre super, wenn unter den Parametric Filtern dies selben Stile wie auch im FireFly (Stilreferenzen) zu finden wären. So gäbe es einen reibungslosen Austausch zwischen FireFly und PSD. Lieben DankSilvan

In photohop, after a generative fill layer it is created, 3 variations are proposed.Sometimes a variation is totally useless and sometimes it is on the right mark  but still not 100% perfect.If would be great  to have a feature to create 3 new variations derived (similar) to a previour variation to refine and increase the chance to have a good result.Midjourney has such a feature an really increase the productivity in the creative process 

I sometimes feel like I'm at cross purposes with Adobe approach. If I find something that works I stick with it. Not you guys, however. Fundamentally opposed to just leaving things alone. It offend you. So the application is in a constant state of flux, which is very irritating. I am sure that you see many fascinating and complex and highly evolved tasks, and sequences of events and innovative ways to use the software that never occur to the rest of us. You are fundamentally opposed to just leaving it alone so it just works, right? Especially when gimmicky  digital tools  have these incredibly short lifespan. In the software  world  you can go from the next big thing to this sucks in two weeks. What is the issue with persisting .pat files? Dude, they are so useful. They can be used in so many ways and then give me enormous  control and they also are highly flexible and you can create a really good look and save it for future use. Why do you have to come through

When doing a dataset as files export photoshop makes sure that when using the data set name in the exported file name and there are multiple entries with the samen content the naming switches from the actual dataset content to the dataset index number as name component ie 'Data Set 10'.I presume that is wanted behaviour to prevent photoshop from overwriting multiple files with the same name.It would be even better if the duplicate name check would be run over the complete name composition including ie the data set numer as this can prevent duplicate naming and the actual data set content wouldn't need replacement in that case.

generative prefernce that allow me to use tools on generative areas without flattening first. Spot healing brush option- allow me to use the SHB on generative areas without flattening layers. 

We constantly have to add products to stock imagery. Using the neural filters is great for getting the lighting and colour right, but the use of AI to 'place' in the scene realistically is limited. I am having to select the transition area and try to get AI to generate a better fill in the transition area as I don't want my product image to be changed. It would be a really useful addition for the sake of productivity if I could select an area, then select an image locally and ask the AI to place the chosen image in the selection area, matching lighting, colour and scale. In addition, the AI cannot replace colour or texture alone, it always replaces with the whole subject, and in many cases this is unsuitable as the trained images that replace are very US specific (cars, licence plates..etc.), if this could also be addressed, I think you have a superb tool.

Hi I'm using the contextual bar for a while now and I think it would be a good ideaof having the contextual bar in a window like adjustments or properties and can be included in your panels in the workspace. I would use it more and it would be distracting as some times you have to move it around because is distracting or it bothers me. But i thing teh bar is a great idea. Thanks for creating a great tool to work wiht and doing it easy and fast. 

The title says it all really.I don't even really use it that much (I'm using Fresco) but I don't really understand why this feature isn't available in both modes (video timeline and frame animation). Unless there is a technical reason?Fresco manages it pretty well, and the workflow is similar than it would be with Photoshop.Thanks!

Aeobe PhotoshopのiPad版の機能が少なすぎます パソコン版並に機能を揃えて欲しいです。 バケツ塗りがレイヤー外の線画に反応しないのもとても不便です 改善よろしくお願いします。