Feature Requests

Adobe has released Firefly in Photoshop's beta version, and it is impressive. It will undoubtedly revolutionize our approach as designers in so many ways. But why on earth doesn't Adobe just copy the freehand lasso tool they have in Adobe Fresco and utilize the exact same technology for Adobe Photoshop? I posted about this idea a couple of months ago, and I've been waiting for the update ever since. (Not just because I posted about it, But as the benefits of implementing it are so obvious). The New update has introduced some features that will make our lives easier in so many ways, but the freehand lasso tool problem remains the same...

The Photoshop 24.5 contextual task bar for transformations - great that it has flip vertical and horizontal. I would love to see a few drop downs to include various regularly used transforms such 1. rotate by 45 degrees2. rotate by 90 degrees3. Scale by 2 x4. Scale by 1/2 x5. Double the height6. Double the width 7. Slant by 45 degrees etcJust a list of common enough transforms that can be used along side the flip, or perhaps have them as buttons as well instead of a drop down ??  Perhaps also add a couple of buttons that can be assigned actions ?? so button 1 can apply a transformation that you regularly do such as scale and rotate and shear and apply a warp etc It be useful for these are the sort of tasks that I regularly apply to type or shapes or a layer and it would be great to have them at hand as a quick tak on the new contextual bar (which is one of the best most useful features you have added for ages, especially great with text and I hope to see with a

Bitmap and tiff format save show negative in Image preview, But after opening it is fine.What to do in this case? How to solve the problem. 

I know the talk of the town has been AI(not adobe illustrator haha), photoshop has been the king of automation for a long time now, and AI tools are just the next step in automation. But I always wondered about making tools that "dont just make the art for you automatically" like what we have been seeing, but also focus on making art tools that help you to "create the art yourself". Something I'd love to see adobe tackle more. Tools that make it easier to create, and not just automate everything for you. Examples1.) I'd love to see Drawing Tools that utilize AI. Like a perspective drawing grid that can not just help you draw and create things in perspective, but could also duplicate your selection and move in further down in any perspective and perhaps auto generate what it would look like as if it were a 3d object. An example would be drawing a window on a building then duplicating it and moving it in a different perspective for another building. Like this type of creativity I'd

I've enjoyed using the beta version, but I think there would be some tools photographers can use to improve photo and have photoshop compete with this AI apps coming out. After using the beta version, I would have loved to be able to make clothing wrinkle free using generative fill. In addition, being able to make a dresses symetrical from one side to another. And selecting a body of water and turning it into a different color such as blue. We have parks in ca with fake green water and would love to make that water blue. Overall, I was able to explore the new tool and I'm impressed with the many things I was able to do. This is based on two photo edit review. 

Hi  Idea :some how to be able to make bookmarks of the technics of editing ( e.g) in Discovery panel  Cheers

You made live previews for the Blend modes, why not to improve the Gradient too? It would be very handy, like in the Illustrator.

Is there a way to view the browser-based interface for Photoshop sharing (review/comment view) in dark mode, or to otherwise change the background color? If not, I would like to suggest that as a feature. When sharing certain documents containing multiple artboards, the artboards can blend into the white background of the preview space, if they don't have visual separation (such as a border) already.

Hey, Adobe! Do you know Retouch4me plugins?They are based on AI and make non-destructive skin editing (healing, dodging & burning).Why don't you buy them or make the same filters in PS? It should detect skin (you already can do this), then detect the texture imperfections (pimples, blemishes) and gently heal (not blur) them like with the Healing brush, but automatically 🙂 + another filter for Dodge&burn.

Airdrop directly from the workspace should be reintroduced. Never understood why this was taken away in the first place. Should be able to "Content Aware Fill" Fill Section by referencing a different layer. Should not have to stick to one layer, kind of like the pick whip in After Effects, or some sort of drop down arrow to select the reference layer.

Photoshop needs a beauty filter of its own built into PS. Check out an app called BeautyPlus (pink icon that has a camera with pastal blue, yellow, purple, green vertical stripes) Within it, you can smooth, brighten eyes, brighten teeth, so much, it's very good for a small app. PS please add a beauty filter like this in PS. Thanks.

Would it be possible to edit back in lightroom after editing in Ps? via a drop down menu. Thank you.

Adobe, add a shortcut to collapse a group from the keyboard (+ a menu command).It could be useful for creating actions and for regular workflow as well. 🙂

Good morning, As a photographer I mainly use photoshop for editing.However, the outputs I get from photomerge are often bad, sometimes ridiculous. Before entering this topic, we need to acknowledge that :1. AI and computing powers are more powerful today than ever and yet the results sometimes seem worse than with older versions2. Photoshop is an expansive product, we monthly pay to have professional outputs, not an outdated feature that leaves us forced to use...3. Affinity Photo, which assembles pictures a bit slower but at least it does it fine.Seriously, I pay for Adobe but end up using its competitor for it's just not usable.  We, photographers, need : 1. An active comprehension of the geometric lines. A panorama is often done with architecture or at least landscapes. It is unbelievable that these types of outcomes happen :(pictures overlap >>30%) 2. An involved algorithmI don't know how else to call it. But OFTEN Photoshop says "pictures c

it will great if we get node based compositing opting along with layer based 

We need an ADOBE Program like Topaz Gigapixel AI.  PS is not an equivalent.  Help us out.

Bonjour,Lorsque j'utilise l'outil de changement de ciel, le dernier ciel utilisé se met en place sans pouvoir arrêter son arrivée.Il me semble que la première étape devrait être le choix du ciel avant de le mettre en place.Si c'est possible, nous aurions un gain de temps ! AmicalementAlain

It is nearly impossible to figure it out, given the operlapping of instructions across Photoshop platforms and versions, but apparently Photoshop Web Beta can't open EPS files.  That's a pretty common requirement for me. Any work-arounds?   

I'd like to copy and paste the graphic font I worked on in the web illustration in the web photoshop.

Hi Adobe I do a lot og images of models, and very often hand are more pale and desaturated than the rest of the skintone. Would it be possible to make a new tool that Combined Burn and Saturate? So instead of burning first and then saturating, have one tool that were contralable with percents both for burn and saturate... So that I in one turn could control the skintone... Would be great if it somehow also could hafe an option for removing red knuckels and fingertips... Just an idea, but I think a lot of us guys doing skinretouch could save some time. Best RegardsPeter

Correction for rolling shutter is time consuming and not always 100% successful. Can Adobe begin developing a neural filter that detects and correct rolling shutter in photographs?

I was recently creating an image and it came to the point that u needed a subtle outer glow for it. I tried using the outer glow layer style, and while it looked okay for the area of the color I chose, it didn't look so great in the others. I looked online for a way to make the outer glow match the edges of the layer only to find that it did not exist. The closest I could get to emulating the effect was to make a copy of the layer and put it underneath, then give that copy layer a Gaussian blur. It worked well enough, but I feel like it could be way easier to have a selection in the outer glow section for "Match Color of Layer Edge" or something along those lines. 

This feature allows you to connect one layer to several layers without considering the order of the layers and make parametric changes in the photo, and this method can be very efficient and creative in seconds and allows you to create new tools.  it is a non-destructive method in data editing.

As a tablet user, I pretty much always keep my brush opacity set to 100%, and paint while frequently changing the brush flow. It's a real pain having to reach for shift and a number while holding the stylus or mouse over and over, so I'd like the option to make the flow shortcuts just the numeric keys (what the Opacity currently is), and make the opacity shortcuts require the shift. I've been looking for workarounds for this, and can't find one outside of plugging in another keyboard to my computer and taping down the shift key. That's how bad I want this! Chris

1 beschreibung :das neue werkzeug macht bereits einen sehr guten job. was ich aber festgestellt habe, wohl aufgrund der linien und kantenerkennung, dass ich damit probleme habe z.b. kabel und eben linienartige strukturen zu entfernen, das das tool denkt er müsste diese linien beibehalten und angleichen. ich wollte z.b. einen baukran verwinden lassen und hatte eben probleme waagrechte und senkrechte linien (gerüst des baukrans) zu entfernen, diagonale waren etwas leichter.es wäre vielleicht gut wenn dem werkzeug eine option beigefügt würde, dass es auf kanten und linien rücksicht nimmt bei der rekonstruktion des entfernen bereichs, bzw. diese unberücksichtig lässt und sich mehr an die umgebung orientiert 2: warum? weil so auch linien und kanten gut entfernt werden, fast sonst nur in wenigen ausnahmen gelingt.