I lose too many credits doing trial and error. The monthly cost should be based on downloads

[Montana30146197yjmd]

I lose too many credits doing trial and error. The monthly cost should be based on downloads

[Kartika Rawat]

Hi Brett5ED9!

Thanks for your feedback! We know how frustrating it is when a generation turns out unusable, like a face missing half its features. I'm merging your thread here since it’s part of a similar discussion. Please add you vote here

^KR

[rmoore007]

you mean it isnt? WTF - I'm paying to the software's screw ups? twisted, mangled hands and distorted ape-like faces?

[PSeale]

Thank you for the updated. Voted on Bori's Idea. I believe it is reasonable. 

[Geovanny_Macias0237]

Deberian tomar en cuenta el descuento de creditos con el video que descarguemos no con todos los intentos que se hagan hasta que la IA entienda 

[julien23786956qa3n]

Bonjour,

Infographiste, m'étant prêté au jeu pour générer une video à partir d'une photo, je constate à l'usage, qu'il faut rectifier à plusieurs reprises le résultat pour de petites erreurs (dans la demande mal formulée, à préciser ou l'interprétation, peu importe). Ce processus est normal, voir les credits défiler l'est moins: ne serait il pas + pertinent de débiter la video générée au téléchargement seulement? Par ailleurs les credits non consommés dans le mois ne sont pas reportés pour les mois suivants: ou c'est insuffisant en cas de besoin, ou inutile si inusité. Enfin ces coûts sont proportionnelement bien plus élevés que la génération d'images fixes.

Les outils IA évoluent très vite, c'est très prometteur. L'outil remplissage pour photoshop, par exemple, est souvent très satisfaisant (encore quelques problèmes de textures différentes). En l'état, pour la génération de video, le ratio entre temps passé, coût crédits, résultat, le compte n'y est pas.

A suivre...

[Kartika Rawat]

Hi Geovanny_Macias0237!

We appreciate your writing in. I'm merging your thread here since it’s part of a similar discussion.

Let us know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

^KR

[djsmartberry]

Djsmartberry

[SamarthS]

Hi @djsmartberry,

We appreciate you writing in, and we will pass along your suggestions to our development team to explore potential adjustments. In the meantime, feel free to reach out if you have any specific issues or if there's anything else we can assist you with.

Thanks for your input!

[Devonna_Harrison]

The generated videos use up credits but there needs to be a sample before it counts as a fully generated video so that adjustments can be made. I'm using up credits just to fix what is being put out. I won't keep paying for that.

[Chief AI Hater Officer]

I believe you

[Deborah_Moura9893]

Olá, 

Gostaria de deixar uma sugestão sobre o sistema de créditos para geração de vídeos no Adobe Firefly.
Tenho notado que, em muitas ocasiões, os vídeos gerados consomem uma grande quantidade de créditos, mas o resultado final não corresponde ao que foi solicitado — seja por distorções, erros visuais graves ou interpretações completamente diferentes do prompt.

Eu entendo que a Inteligência Artificial ainda está em processo de aprimoramento, e que nem sempre é possível garantir resultados perfeitos. No entanto, acredito que seria mais justo e equilibrado para os usuários se os créditos fossem debitados apenas quando o vídeo fosse efetivamente baixado.

Dessa forma, o criador teria a chance de avaliar o resultado antes de consumir seus créditos, o que incentivaria a experimentação, aumentaria a confiança na ferramenta e evitaria a sensação de perda quando o vídeo gerado não atinge o esperado.

Em resumo, a ideia seria:

• Os créditos só seriam descontados após o download do vídeo (ou seja, quando o usuário aprova o resultado).

• Caso o vídeo seja descartado ou não corresponda ao pedido, os créditos permaneceriam disponíveis para novas tentativas.

Essa pequena mudança traria uma experiência mais transparente e justa, especialmente para quem está testando ideias e explorando os limites criativos do Firefly

[Deborah_Moura9893]

Hello 

I would like to leave a suggestion about the credit system for generating videos in Adobe Firefly.
I've noticed that, on many occasions, the generated videos consume a large amount of credits, but the final result doesn't match what was requested — either due to distortions, serious visual errors, or completely different interpretations of the prompt.

I understand that Artificial Intelligence is still in the process of improvement, and that it is not always possible to guarantee perfect results. However, I believe that it would be fairer and more balanced for users if credits were only debited when the video was actually downloaded.

In this way, the creator would have the chance to evaluate the result before consuming their credits, which would encourage experimentation, increase confidence in the tool and avoid the feeling of loss when the generated video does not reach the expected.

In summary, the idea would be:

• Credits would only be deducted after the video was downloaded (i.e., when the user approves the result).

• If the video is discarded or does not match the request, the credits would remain available for retrying.

This small change would bring a more transparent and fair experience, especially for those who are testing ideas and exploring the creative limits of Firefly

[SamarthS]

Hi @Deborah_Moura9893, 

Thank you so much for taking the time to share your thoughtful suggestion. We really appreciate it.

We’re constantly working to improve Firefly, and feedback like yours helps us shape a better experience for everyone. While we can’t promise immediate changes, your suggestion has been noted and will be shared with the product team for consideration.
Thanks again for being part of the Firefly community and helping us grow. If you have any more ideas or questions, we’re always here to listen.

[robybob]

la generazione di firefly da testo a video con una immagine di riferimento è a dir poco vergognosa. Oltretutto spendi crediti anche se il risultato è inutilizzabile e questo non è giusto. Fammi spendere 1 credito per ogni tentativo, anche senza poterlo scaricare, e poi quando il risultato è coerente e lo voglio scaricare, fammi pagare i crediti richiesti x il tipo di qualità scelta. Trovo questa cosa veramente frustrante e ingiusta. Il file che ho caricato è il risultato di una semplice richiesta di far muovere SOLO la coda alla gatta, mantenemdo il riferimento della gatta caricato come esempio. (100 crediti)