• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
292

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

Community Beginner ,
May 23, 2023 May 23, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Bunny.png

image (1).png

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

Bug Started Locked
TOPICS
Desktop-macOS , Desktop-Windows

Views

208.7K

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Adobe Employee , Nov 10, 2023 Nov 10, 2023

Dear Community,

On November 7th, 2023, the Firefly for Photoshop service was updated and improved for this issue. You should encounter fewer guideline errors when working on or near skin-tone areas that do not violate the community guidelines.

While the improvement is a big step in the right direction, we are continuing to explore new ways to minimize false-positives. Please continue to give us feedback on this new forum thread and also report false violation errors in the application.
Thank you

...

Votes

Translate

Translate
replies 1382 Replies 1382
1,381 Comments
New Here ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

While most censorship and content restrictions are valid, placing too many restrictions like those on visuals such as blood is unnecessary and hamper creativity. I wanted to turn a portrait of a model into a vampire and wanted some blood dripping from her mouth. But even a little trickle of blood violates the guidelines which seem intentionally set up to be broken even by those with purely creative intentions. 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

What about over-the-counter guns? Is it less dangerous than AI?Your argument is ridiculous

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

It's pretty much useless for beach photography, sports photography. Whether a man or a woman it'll say it's violating community guidelines. Was this tool designed by a radical cleric? Lol.

 

The reason why these tools tend to fail on hands and feet is because these AI companies tend to steer clear of human anatomy (inherently 'evil'). Meanwhile if you learn real art this is the foundation where you start. 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Before everyone goes off on some tangental rant about dystopian censorship [too late!] - ever thought that this is simply a bug in a beta release? Try entering a prompt, even a simple one and the error response goes away...

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi @Olivier2023242526 please follow forum guidelines.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

@Olivier2023242526

 

Bakhtiar's argument is not ridiculous at all, it is a very sensible one, and it sums up the whole dilemma very well. Yours doesn't.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi @FrangipaniOz try entering a prompt and not leaving the generative fill blank.

Also there is a new version that may help. You may have to uninstall the beta first to see the new version available.
Adobe Photoshop Version: 24.6.0 20230603.m.2196 77b00e0 x64 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi @Sandy Photog did you enter a prompt? If not try and see if that works.

Also there is a new version available you can try.

You may have to uninstall the beta first to see the new version available.
Adobe Photoshop Version: 24.6.0 20230603.m.2196 77b00e0 x64 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I do have the most current version of Beta already.  However, entering a prompt did help on this one.  

 

Thank you.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

@E250916993jnw, ha, re your point: “Meanwhile if you learn real art this is the foundation where you start,” I'm reminded of Szukalski, who complained when ordered in art school to learn from live figures, saying, “Working from the model destroys the talent.”

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Adobe Employee ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thanks everyone.

 

As this is a beta release, the team is constantly evaluating how the prompt and image filters perform. If you encounter an error that you consider to be incorrect please report it using the beta feedback panel. Your image or prompt may not be violating the terms and conditions and we may be filtering it in error.

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Explorer ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hello Cory

Why didn't Adobe inform me of this Betea feedback panel when I reach ou to them last week? I made intial contact over chat, and then they had an engineer call me on the phone. Both said to post the problem here. Where can I find this feedback panel? 

 

Regards

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Adobe Employee ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi @JET Studios we are sorry this wasn't made clear.  If you click on the beaker icon in the upper right, it will open the info screen. When you click on the Generative Fill section you will have the ability to share your feedback there.

 

Screen Shot 2023-06-07 at 11.56.19 AM.pngScreen Shot 2023-06-07 at 11.57.37 AM.png

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I have similar issues.

I create a fully new image from a blank canvas. Then I use the lasso tool to select a part to replace/improve with or without prompt. Then it tells me that the image violates policy and has been removed. As the base image is still there, I can only conclude that the smaller filled part was removed directly after generation. Why would it be able to produce something against its own policy?

 

VeneficusFerox_0-1686160306329.png

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi @VeneficusFerox as mentioned in here extensively, try entering a prompt to bypass the false error.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

"The reason why these tools tend to fail on hands and feet is because these AI companies tend to steer clear of human anatomy (inherently 'evil'). Meanwhile if you learn real art this is the foundation where you start. "

You wouldn't know it from the number of images of amply chested women I see often on AI platforms. No, the real reason is that AI has difficulties with hands and feet for the same reason that real artists often find them difficult to draw or paint. They are very complex parts of our anatomy. At this time, Midjourney usually (I emphasise usually) does a very good job with hands and fingers. With feet, not so much. 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I said it befor, I'll say it again. It's not the user violating the guidelines...it's the bot refusing to accept its own results. If the error message were to read something along the lines of, "the bot has generated results that are in violation of user guidelines and cannot be displayed," I think we'd have fewer instances of complaints over here. While I've received numerous violation notices, generative fill to date has saved a least a dozen of my images that would have taken hours to fix, if I bothered to fix them at all. Be patient, people. 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Explorer ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

The concern for me at least is that it doesn't look like a bug as much as it suggests that "community standards" censorship is a feature.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thanks Kevin! If only forums could have multiple pinned comments or worked like reddit with upvotes you might not have to repeat yourself so much! Worked fer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
New Here ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I'm getting the same error with a photo of my mom looking into a vanity mirror (wedding photos) - there's nothing offensive about it. Happy to provide photo for investigation just don't want to post it publically.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
New Here ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

While I understand that Adobe dosn't want Generative Fill to be used to generate adult oriented content for obvious reasons, it is not quite clear to me if it's permitted to be used on on photographs containing nudity. Specifically for object removal in the background.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Engaged ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Seems to me like they need a hell of a lot of bug fixing to to do. Most of my generations are pretty crap with the subject NOT keeping within the selection

 

 

 

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Explorer ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Is the policy going forward strict moderation of tools?  

What if I use your tools to create something Adobe deems unsavory or problematic?  Do they reserve the right to delete my PSD file? This was always the fear with the cloud-based model and it's a bummer to actually see lawyers dictating creative policy.  

You should strongly considering taking off the handcuffs and letting creatives make what they want to make.  I don't trust the Adobe Council of Ethics to rule properly on my creative work.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Explorer ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Additionally, I do a lot of fashion, boudoir, and art nudes... Why do I have to adhere to the lowest common denominator when it comes to using the tools I pay for in an entirely legal manner to support my business?   

 

I can totally get behind making it more difficult for anything that involves body swapping, or significantly modifying bodies.  Or taking a dressed subject and swapping them into nudity or near enough...

 

But if you're starting with a subject that's already in lingerie, it seems we've already gone past the "community standards" and shouldn't have to fight with Adobe to let us work.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
New Here ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I have discovered that anything in the tonal range of skin is deemed inappropriate. I tried to remove a tattoo from a person of colour, hair across the face of a caucasian girl and extend the skirt of a peach coloured tulle skirt (in the colour range of skin tone) and all were refused. I think the puritans running the system need to consider that skin appears in any image with a human it it and skin in itself is not bad!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report