P: Generated images violate user guidelines

[Hematita]

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

[ArchiStudent]

Ich bin Architekturstudent und wollte die Generative Füllung ausprobieren.

Dafür hatte ich eine normale Isometrie zur Grundlage und wollte jetzt beispielsweise Pflanzen daran hochranken lassen.

Leider wird mir immer angezeigt, dass der Befehl nicht ausgeführt werden könne, da er gegen die Nutzerrichtlinien verstoße.

[ArchiStudent]

Kurzes Update, irgendwie verstoßen alle Befehle gegen die Nutzerrichtlinien. Auch wenn ich auf einer weißen Arbeitsoberfläche "Möwe" oder "Meer mit Sonnenuntergang" eingebe. Hilfe! 😄

[RFerraz1984]

Usando diariamente o recurso de preenchimento generativo, recebo constantemente o aviso de que as imagens violam as "Diretrizes de Usuário da IA Generativa da Adobe - versão Beta", mesmo quando se trata de um simples "objeto", um "muro" ou o "céu", por exemplo.

[davescm]

Hi , I've moved your post from the Photoshop forum to the Photoshop Beta forum where you are more likely to get help with your issue.

Dave

[alfred531]

[Graham24508943nobd]

It's a well known and heavily reported issue. Hopefully they'll sort it before it goes much further

[Graham24508943nobd]

Apparently petunias are against regulations too   😅😅😅

[Søren Bech30729629fway]

If this feature gets released then please lower the restriction on this thing. Even the most harmless stuff gets flagged when not even entering words to the promt. And when words are added: What is wrong with words like fang, finger, etc. etc., anyways?

[jane-e]

@Søren Bech30729629fway 

The Photoshop team is investigating the false flags and wants them to be reported. I've moved your post to the primary thread in the Photoshop Beta forum. Please post any further false flags in this thread. Hopefully this will be sorted before GF moves out of public beta.

Jane

[Graham24508943nobd]

It's so [cursing removed] weird. It'll refuse a stupid word like lampost yet, allow lamp. It's broke !!

[Thomas225]

Got error for trying to create a normal elefant next to a giraffe that was created.

[Graham24508943nobd]

I typed in the prompt box woman in bikini on beach. Of course it went against their community guidelines, so I just typed in woman on beach, and what did I get ? A woman in a bikini and a real hottie too 😅😅😅. You couldn't make it up

[jane-e]

@Thomas225 wrote: Got error for trying to create a normal elefant next to a giraffe that was created.

Thomas, try using the correct spelling of "elephant" and let us know if that works for you.

Jane

[MontyWales]

A woman in a bikini and a real hottie too

Pic or it didn't happen 🙂 

[RussFrancis]

I generated an image in midjourney which added gibberish to a shirt. When I tried to remove the gibberish in photoshop, I was denied the action and told it violated user guidelines.

[DSA30749307yozl]

user guidelines are very aggressive, repeatedly detects inappropriate material that does not violate the rules
I am working with an image of a girl and a man dressed as a car mechanic, he is pointing the way to the girl, I want to enlarge the photo panorama, but Photoshop takes it as inappropriate, in another occasion, it was a man helping a woman to stand up in a park because she had fallen, I wanted to enlarge the background, but Photoshop takes it as inappropriate.

[twistless]

Did the beta update. "Becasue they violate user guidelines" is still absolutely brutal. No change in it creeping into 95% or what I try to do. Was hoping tht the update would fix this. Even with prompts, even with elements that are rated PG (or even rated G for that matter), even when the subjects aren't even people at all, just assume your attempt is going to get struck down. As many have said... these restrictions are making everything completely frustrating. Photoshop has never policed my images in my past 25 years of using it. If this is the path that companies are going to take, other companies will find a way and the masses will leave the restrictive ones behind. Just a matter of time.

[jane-e]

@twistless wrote: Becasue they violate user guidelines

GF is in beta. Did you send the psd, saved selection, and prompt to Adobe as per the pinned reply from Pete Green?

Jane

[Sebastian30754594nw9l]

  

[Graham24508943nobd]

I've had this gibberish frequently, so annoying 

[phil bauch]

True, I was really impressed by Firefaly the first days, especially consideringit's beta state. But it becomes more usesless every day. I could not even add or manipulatesd  my own non nude non violent works. Lates fun: 3D AI generated content, a medieval moose with a leather vest, mystical. Wanted to add soe fire and smoke, and it's agains guidelines. Yesterday I wanted to remove an image PS itself created at a wall, while enlargibg a photo of a room. "Against our guidelines"). This pops more up than any usable result. And worse: There's no option to comment this, wich would be a help for firefly's training...

Another photographers story I read some days ago: Trying to put clothes ON a model (act photography), so actually dressing her. "Against our guidelines". That's worse than a mongrel of Vatican City, Zuckerberg and Kim Jong-un, just plain ridiculous. How to work  professionally with this and not just removing clouds from last Mallorca holiday photo to impress friends or removing a candle on grandmas birthday cake to please her? Again, hillarious, it started so well, but...

[DavKa88]

But it also provides a LOT of bad results (deformed hands and feet, grotesque faces, 3 legs, etc) without triggering the violation caption.

[Graham24508943nobd]

Talking about bad results, how many times have users prompted things like forest, table, person animal etc.... and NOTHING shows up ?  Same with asking for a waterfall lately

[Graham24508943nobd]

Just prompted for a forest again and ONE solitary tree appeared. It's a joke.  In saying that, here's an image I made recently

 

[esaa92482102]

I can't use generative fill for this area without getting this message. I have tried different selections too but it seems out of focus green leaves generate so nasty content that it's prohibited 🙂