P: Generated images violate user guidelines

[Hematita]

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

[Graham24508943nobd]

Has anyone else found that trying to generate any part of the human body since the last update has been almost impossible ?

I've been trying to get a horribly deformed mouth to suit a pretty face but it's taaken me 20 attempts. Here's three of the horrors I've had to endure so far. As for limbs ?  Sheeeesh what a joke. One woman had four arms, with the green head she looked so much like Medusa I had to get her off my screen in case she turned me to stone .  My opinion is that generations have become much much worse 

 

 

 

[SilverIrisPhotography]

Hi there!

I am trying to edit a photo in the photoshop beta, and all I am trying to do is replace a floor where a mother and daughter are standing. However, I keep getting a notification saying that "The generative fill has been removed due to guideline violations" which is totally not true! 

I'm thinking this is a bug. 

[András5C1C]

If I don't need prompting, my solution is to turn the layer to Invert by an Adjustment layer. Merge, select and use generative fill. If you are happy with the result turn it back inverting it back.

[David30122720qek7]

The "looking for alternatives" is key here. I run a business and spending hours trying to coax PS into letting me put a bucket on a beach without a violation means that I don't use it. Ultimately another company will do it properly, and PS will lose out.

[Claudivan30426554ysia]

Censorship! Since the last update, the tool has become practically unusable. The yellow warning constantly pops up, everything is offensive. I believe the community wants to pay for something that doesn't restrict their creativity. Personally, if this continues until the end of the month, I will cancel my subscription. It seems like everything is offensive in the latest beta version.

[Guillermo30570723t76n]

Hola, el relleno de la ia detecta que violo sus reglas constantemente, soy fotógrafo de bebés recién nacidos, podrían ajustar los filtros de la ia un poco menos severos

[Graham24508943nobd]

I agree, not only the warning box, but the actual generations have become a LOT worse IMO.

[defaultgh5c5ca9s2ud]

I'm using Generative Fill to blend the edges of layers. 6-8 out of 10 times the tool reports that the generated images violate the guidlines. 100% of the time the content of the selection is entirely benign — a shirt sleeve, a shoe, a window, a section of someone's ankle, the whispy hair around the top of someone's head, etc. The selection is often so small it's difficult to even imagine what it could be trying to generate that is violating the guidelines. It appears to happen most ofen anywhere in proximity to anything that is similar in color to a white person's skin. It's incredibly frustrating.              

It could be helpful to at least see tiny examples of what was generated so that users can actually give feedback on whether the generated content obviously violated the terms. Or at least have the error message report what it thinks it generated that violated the guidelines and let users report when the reason it gives is incorrect.

[Kevin Stohlmeyer]

@defaultgh5c5ca9s2ud what are you entering for a prompt or are you just rolling the dice and hoping for an outcome?

[defaultgh5c5ca9s2ud]

Yes and no. It's more likely to generate something if a prompt is entered, however, a prompt basically always produces worse results in a use case like this. In my particular example, fussing with the exact pixels of the selection several times eventually generated something I was looking for, while any reference to "shoes" would always try to fill the area with part of a Converse-style sneaker, apparently no matter how it was worded, whether very general or very specific.

[KaiserBoy]

Put a "." (period) in the input dialog space and all will be well.

[GABRIEL31368664lswz]

My common violations. Brown armchair arm he insists on blocking anyway.

[Olivier2023242526]

I propose immediate imprisonment. At Adobe, it is forbidden!

[Garrett31376131he4d]

sometimes just putting a period in the box and the warning does not come up.

[Graham24508943nobd]

So Yesterday I was able to change dresses on women on a beach and type in swimwear. NOW IT'S violating guidelines. What gives ?  It's REALLY [cursing removed] bigtime

[Adithyan22780436gkut]

There are some funny errors in yours generative fill guidelines. When i typed to generate smoke for a fire, it said it is against guidelines. What a situation is this. Please clear out these type of things, then only we will be properly able to use such features

[thekohlervillager]

The prompt "Make leg straight" got me a warning. I didn't get a warning if I did "Straighten leg." Just seems to be no rhyme nor reason to these warnings. 

[Graham24508943nobd]

Yes like Swimwear is against guidlines but swimming costume is ok. woman in swimwear was allowed once just now, but 2nd time it was banned. They REALLY need to get the finger out and do something. Nearly 3 months this has been going on and it's MUCH worse instead of better

[Graham24508943nobd]

Tried 7 regenerations and I CANNOT get a decent hand on this woman the other one's pretty poor as well. 

 

[daniellei4510]

Very few AI programs can do hands and feet properly. There is at least one exception but even it can delivrer a six or seventh finger now and then. You'll be extremely lucky if you get a result that works or that at least doesn't require some additional hands-on editing (no pun intended). 

[Randalph]

It's getting worse everyday, now they ban the image directly on your computer... We live in the movie 1984, guys. Here we are. You cannot even resize if this stupid bot doesn't like your picture...ADOBE IS THIS A JOKE ?

[Graham24508943nobd]

Problem is that it's way beyond a joke now 

[Gregusaurus]

I really don't understand the anger. This is a beta. It's experimental. We are guests and tester. They are working on it. 

[Graham24508943nobd]

I've been working on this test since it came out in MAY ! Havn't seen the slightest improvement

[daniellei4510]

So...two months? Adobe's Neural Filter Background Blur has been in beta since around July of 2021. Beta testing can take a very time.