Copy link to clipboard
Copied
This happens to me a lot. My pictures get rejected because of quality issues. I dont see why. Good resolution, no grain or artefacts to my eyes. And I think its sharp enough.
Maybe becuase of the flare?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hello,
Well, the first picture -00243 - is this AI-generated? If so there are guidelines you have to follow.
0459, it won't pass, if this was intentional - it won't pass! Too much blur!!! It doesn't work.
0374, will probably need a property release. As far as quality, I think the white balance could be better!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thanks! I'll try to improve.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
In addition to the comments from @ricky336 :
1. If you zoom in and inspect carefully you will see the inconsistencies in the design - a frequent issue with generative ai assets...
2. Everything is blurred and there are some extraneous elements in the frame - perhaps a tighter crop would work ?
3. Leaning verticals, artifacts in the sky
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thankful for the detail explanation!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
for your first, you didn't confirm that it is AI. The look suggests AI, the exif says that it has been shot with a camera at ISO 2000, which would explain the soft look due to your execive noise reduction. There are also artefacts suggesting some kind of photo editing.
If this is a photoshopped asset or an AI image, then I think you chose the wrong tool to create this. I would have modelled this in 3D and rendered it. Shouldn't be too difficult to do.