Rejected due to quality issues

@kosho28349937ukc4 

for your first, you didn't confirm that it is AI. The look suggests AI, the exif says that it has been shot with a camera at ISO 2000, which would explain the soft look due to your execive noise reduction. There are also artefacts suggesting some kind of photo editing. 

If this is a photoshopped asset or an AI image, then I think you chose the wrong tool to create this. I would have modelled this in 3D and rendered it. Shouldn't be too difficult to do.

In addition to the comments from @Ricky336 :

1. If you zoom in and inspect carefully you will see the inconsistencies in the design - a frequent issue with generative ai assets...

2. Everything is blurred and there are some extraneous elements in the frame - perhaps a tighter crop would work ?
3. Leaning verticals, artifacts in the sky 

Hello,

Well, the first picture -00243 - is this AI-generated? If so there are guidelines you have to follow.

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-faq.html
• https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-contributors-discussions/announcing-the-adobe-stock-policy-on-generative-ai-content/td-p/13395888
• Generative AI submission guidelines - Adobe Support Community - 13549435

0459, it won't pass, if this was intentional - it won't pass! Too much blur!!! It doesn't work.

0374, will probably need a property release. As far as quality, I think the white balance could be better!