• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Rejected due to quality issues

Community Beginner ,
Feb 10, 2023 Feb 10, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

This happens to me a lot. My pictures get rejected because of quality issues. I dont see why. Good resolution, no grain or artefacts to my eyes. And I think its sharp enough. 
Maybe becuase of the flare?

TOPICS
Contributor critique , Contributors , Fotolia , Troubleshooting

Views

472

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 10, 2023 Feb 10, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hello,

Well, the first picture -00243 - is this AI-generated? If so there are guidelines you have to follow.

0459, it won't pass, if this was intentional - it won't pass! Too much blur!!! It doesn't work.

0374, will probably need a property release. As far as quality, I think the white balance could be better!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Feb 10, 2023 Feb 10, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thanks! I'll try to improve.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 10, 2023 Feb 10, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

In addition to the comments from @ricky336 :

1. If you zoom in and inspect carefully you will see the inconsistencies in the design - a frequent issue with generative ai assets...

2. Everything is blurred and there are some extraneous elements in the frame - perhaps a tighter crop would work ?
3. Leaning verticals, artifacts in the sky 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Feb 10, 2023 Feb 10, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thankful for the detail explanation!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 11, 2023 Feb 11, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

@kosho28349937ukc4 

for your first, you didn't confirm that it is AI. The look suggests AI, the exif says that it has been shot with a camera at ISO 2000, which would explain the soft look due to your execive noise reduction. There are also artefacts suggesting some kind of photo editing. 96194104-7F3E-4462-A4D3-C70005EC7004.jpeg

 

If this is a photoshopped asset or an AI image, then I think you chose the wrong tool to create this. I would have modelled this in 3D and rendered it. Shouldn't be too difficult to do.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines