SteveG(AudioMasters) wrote The idea is that if you are actually editing sound takes for your video, you do that in the video editor. That's where all the time-coded views are, and therefore that's the sensible place to do this. The purpose of adding Audition to the mix at present isn't for editing to take place in it, but for what always used to be known as 'sweetening' to take place. Thanks. I've come to this as I've been overseeing the technical side of a podcast production. We record and then simultaneously sweeten the raw recording and edit for content (sweetener does not trim, editor does not worry about levels/sound quality as his files are replaced). We did try doing the editorial in Premiere Pro - but found it much more cumbersome for actually editing audio (responsiveness of timeline, size & clarity of waveforms etc). Strictly speaking this approach does not 'require' timecode. But when the editor does spot an issue (e.g. profanity at XX:XX) it would be a quicker & more exact process to just send over a source timecode as reference, rather than everyone translate a 'xx from start of original recording' time. PS I've actually been editing & finishing sound as a video editor for a long time (pre NLE/DAW) so my judgment is obviously clouded by that! We used to have to fight Avid's fear that ProTools would be cannibalised if they ported functionality to Media Composer, now there is quite a bit that has made it across - but ProTools is still far superior for finishing audio.
... View more