@Samuel Klein,
> i can't delete a transcript and create a new one or change the language? why??
See my earlier post regarding re-transcribing. You do not have to delete the transcript to re-transcribe.
https://community.adobe.com/t5/premiere-pro-ideas/provide-a-way-to-delete-a-transcription/idc-p/13961008#M10315
> That's not solving the problem at all. The request is to delete the entire transcript, not the audio track.If i got that right there is no way to do that except create a new project and import the files again, no?
I think you're referring to the post about using Bulk Delete Speakers. I agree. Bulk Delete Speakers only works in the timeline (not the source media transcription), and removes the video/audio for what is deleted. The source media transcript remains, and will be added new to any sequence that adds the clip.
> there is no way to do that except create a new project and import the files again, no?'
I think that is mostly true. But what workflow would benefit from that if it really needs a Delete Transcript function.
Replace footage does not work. The transcript remains, and is associated with the new clip - even if the times do not match.
Delete the clip from the current project and reimport it. The transcript is gone.
Most of the comments in this feature request do not provide examples of workflows that need the option to delete the transcript. Most have other ways to accomplish the goal, such as re-transribing. Or the user does not understand the difference between the source media transcript (which is always the whole thing), the sequence transcript that is the parts of clips included in the sequence, and static/sequence transcripts that are created as the sequence exists at that moment and do not change as edits are made to the sequence.
Intuitively, it just seems like a good idea. Practically, I have to work through whether there isn't a way to accomplish each goal. The transcripts are coded into the project file. Oops; I turned on transcribe all files and now I want to get rid of the bloat: no way.
@TeresaDemel Is this ever likely to be included?
Stan
... View more