P: Error at loading of ippCV library

Pls help me anyone to solve this problem!

@Richard Lindley   2nd link still there and looks to work for me.  1st link my security had some issue with I think.

It's Windows only, not suitable for Mac - sorry.

@shad0w 

As I have the same problem on a MacPro 3,1 (Version 2020 working well and 2021 crashing on start) I download the pack of libs but I can't find where in the Install directory of 2021 I can put this pack that will overwrite the wrong opens library. Thanks in advance for clues on a Mac for that.

I'm really lost here. I tried to go to those links in the first message and neither linked with anything. I'm getting the same error message. How do you fix it?

@shad0w You're a life saver! It worked, thank you!

Error message:

Your application is dynamically linked with Intel(R)IPP libraries version 2020.0.1 (r0x35c5ec66)

No DLL from the list below is found on the system search path:

ippcvm7.dll (the most suitable for your CPU)

Please provide a path to at least one of them

OK

*pepelpz 

That's not needed and that's not my goal.
I just want Photoshop to become better, or at least not to become worse.

@ProDesignTools 

I guess there is some misunderstanding here.
To me and I would say to most users it's not a problem to use PS 2020 even during couple of months from now on if Adobe would say that this will be fixed or at least will be looked into and concidered if this could be fixed.
But all they were saying is "use previous version or upgrade CPU", which to me reads like "it is what it is - live with it, it will not change".
That is the problem.

To be clear, Adobe has not threatened the user with the issue of terms. I am not Adobe; I am an end-user of the software just like you...

However, all customers agree to certain terms when using Adobe's software, and just saying that it's better not to violate those terms. There is no need to do so.

A week ago you could use the previous release of Photoshop 21.x with no problem. And today we still can – so until this issue is addressed by Adobe (hopefully relatively quickly), that looks to be the best course of action.

Exactly, they make the mistake and also threaten the user with the issue of terms.
What's more, they should pay the user who found the solution