Feature Requests

I have searched and have not been able to find any info. on this. I am cropping images to 16:9 (and using generative expand when needed), but I also want them to fit within a 4:3 aspect ratio as I'm using the same file for both. I assume this doesn't exist, but it would be great if the cropping tool had an option to show an overlay of another aspect ratio as you cropped. So as you are cropping to a 16:9, the overlay would also show you another selected ratio. I know I can switch to 4:3 to see if it will fit that as well, but just thought it would be a useful feature. Thanks.

I love using the Pattern Preview function for standard repeats. Is it possible to use this function for a half drop repeat?

My PS editing makes extensive use of layers, layer masks and adjustment layers.  I have used Lightroom Classic mostly for sorting, preliminary global adjustments and cropping.  I have only recently started exploring the masking features in LR  and finding myself wondering if the individually masked areas of my LR image could port over to PS as layers. More than once recently, I have used the masking tools in LR only to use selection tools to isolate the same area again in PS.Thanks.George ButchPlantation, FL

If I open a smart object, add a layer I want to preserve and hit save, I sometimes get this error: "Can't save this document back to its original file format. Flatten layers and discard extra data as necessary then choose File > Save again. You can save the file using File > Save As, but the associated smart objects will not be updated." Such a self-aware error message! The devs seem to know exactly what I want to do and are offering workarounds rather than just doing what I want. So my suggestion is: do what I want! When I press ctrl+s, save the multi-layer smart object as a psb instead of a png/jpg, then replace all instances of the existing smart object in the original document while maintaining their translations/styles/filters/etc. Part of my confusion is that dragging a png or jpg into my file results in a png/jpg smart object, whereas if I ctrl+v paste it in then right click layer > Convert to Smart Object, I get a psb smart object. I do both interch

I double-click a Smart Object, a new tab opens with the Smart Object in it, I make the changes I want, then I click Save, and instead of saving the changes and taking me back to the first tab, the JPEG or PNG Error dialog appears (Can't save this document back to its original file format. Flatten layers and discard extra data as necessary then choose File > Save again.) This issue has been posted in plenty of forums before, and while I completely understand that a JPG cannot sustain layers or other modifications, what is the point of having a Smart Object if it behaves like this? This is SURELY a bug and could be handled way better. If I import files into my Photoshop document as a Smart Object, then it should be.. a SMART OBJECT—not some ‘Embedded JPG You Cannot Edit’ nonsense. I’ve seen replies saying this is “normal behaviour” while patronizing people who rightly asked the question. I had to write my own script just to import multiple files into the same PSD and have th

I'm sure like me, you all have multiple Photoshop documents/projects on the go at the same time. Well as soon as you get to around 5 or more documents open at once, the tab list of documents no longer fit across the toolbar.It's also equally frustrating that the active tab you're currently working on doesn't just display the name of the psd, but also displays the name of the currently selected layer (like I care), the zoom level (why on earth?!) and the colour mode (meh?). I'm confident that there are ways in which Adobe could change the layout of the tabs and I have a few ideas which could work. Let me know what you think. And if you have any other good ideas, leave a comment: Note, I've listed these in order of 'usefullness'. The first being less helpful and the final option being most useful. The least effective, but simplest change:This update would not solve the issue, certainly not for me but others may disagree. However, it would make a small difference. At the very le

I think Adobe should standardize the color corrections across the Adobe CC programs with Lumetri Color and Lumetri Scopes. If you are not familiar with these tools, they are used Premiere Pro and After Effects for color correction. (Most of the other tools are still there, but have been supplanted by the Lumetri system.) When it first appeared in Premiere Pro CC 2015 (?), it seemed to be based on the Lightroom/Camera Raw editing interface. I realize that PS has Camera Raw filter, but it would be nice to consolidate the the main color tools like Adobe did in PPro and AE. (I saw this request posted about 3 years ago, but it did not seem to get much traction.)

buenas,Sería buena idea añadir la opción de DUPLICAR CAPAS VISIBLES en photoshop sin utilizar el atajo de teclado Ctrl + Alt + Shift + E ¿Es posible hacerlo?, gracias

Dear Photoshop Developers I have recently started working with 32bit greyscale images, and need to make finite adjustments to greyscale values.When brightening or darkening these images, I would love to be able to monitor how I'm affecting the actual pixel values. The problem is to do with the Eyedropper sample tools using 32bit greyscale images. It occurs when using either the eyedropper or colour sampler tools. When I open a 32 bit greyscale image in photoshop; levels, curves, and exposure adjustment layers are often required to see the work which is being carried out due to the enormous DR of 32bit.The first image above is without exposure adjustment preview or layers turned on. The second image has the exposure adjustment layers turned on so I can see what I'm doing.In 26.5, I understand that I can select the adjustment layer above the base image, and it will show adjusted/original value comparison. But I need to be able to work on a duplicate of the base image with

The Rec2020 colorspace (aka ITU-R BT.2020) is a critical colorspace for photography and not a standard option in Photoshop. You can only install it yourself or open a file which already has it embedded, which makes things cumbersome and prone to error (there are different Rec2020 profiles on the web with different gammas, etc). Rec2020 is the preferred colorspace for HDR (and is LRC's working primaries when in HDR mode). Rec2020 is also very ideal for print-related work as it includes many printable colors which fall outside Adobe RGB / P3, and yet avoids the excess of ProPhoto (which includes many imaginary values outside the range of human vision). Request: please add default support in Photoshop for Rec.2020 colorspace (ie just as we have default support for sRGB, ProPhoto, etc). Ideally this colorspace would use a D65 white point and rec709 EOTF to faciliate SDR workflows for print. That ETOF would be most consistent for SDR editing controls in curves, color picker,

I can't find a solution anywhere, but the preview pane when using Distort > Wave is comically small, even on an ultrawide monitor. I've noticed that other filters within the Distort submenu allow for preview zooming, but not Wave for some reason. To make things worse, the white/gray transparent background preview is extremely noisy at that size, and I would like to see an option added to change the preview background. Changing my layer to a neon green before running the filter helps ever so slightly, but my steadily declining vision still can't handle how hard it is too see.

Wenn beim öffnen einer Bildddatei eine Profilwarnung auftaucht, sollte gleichzeitig eine Vorschau erscheinen in dem das zu öffnende Bild angezeigt wird mit entsprechenden Hinweisen, welches RGB-Profil zugewiesen werden könnte.

PHOTOSHOP DEVS: I would like the brush feather to never exceed the brush shape. Currently the larger the feather gets, the more it exceeds the brush shape.  The reason why this is a problem is because I am using the brush shape as a guide when I mask. Since the feather exceeds the brush shape my mask is inaccurate. If you want to give people an option you can have a checkbox or dropdown so they can determine the way the feather will work.

For instance, when installing the Pantone Connect plug-in, I didn't even think to go to Windows>Extensions>PantoneConnect to find it and spent all afternoon digging around on the internet for solutions. Maybe they could each have their own tab or something.

Have been using photoshop desktop for years to edit photos in .jpeg (mostly removing little objects) and outcome photo is always little smaller or little bigger in size with same resolution and meta data.   Now started to use photoshop web version for the same above mentioned editing as my computer doesn't support latest version and ai features of photoshop but here the outcome image size of .jpeg files is drastically reduced while keeping resolution and metadata.   There is no option to choose image quality while saving a photo like in desktop version   Any idea to keep photo size about intact like desktop version  

Hi all, I am desperately reporting a very inconvenient brush size-saving feature in Photoshop and begging for a fix.I originally started using Photoshop, but I continually feel stressed because of the lack of a brush size memory feature. I’ve used Clip Studio Paint, which has a feature that remembers each brush's size individually. However, I want to continue using Photoshop because I love this program. Here’s a feature that I believe Photoshop must add:I want each brush to retain the last size I used for it separately (meaning, I want each brush to remember its own last-used size, instead of sharing the same size across all brushes).For example, as you all know, when I use Brush A with a default size of 5 and change its size to 20, then switch to Brush B and return to Brush A, the brush is no longer at size 20. It automatically reverts to its originally registered size of 5.To make the brush remember the size I last used, I tried saving Brush A as a new brush preset and unchecked the

I need to use symmetry path a lot in my work and I'm working with huge documents. I'm always frustrated beyond time and space that it's ALWAYS appears somehwere THERE where I cannot see it. I need to make new concept in another place of the doc so I need it to follow my "viewport". Could you do this please? You already have "use last symmetry" why don't you give "place symmetry in a middle of the screen" option (or make it as default)? This would GREATLY reduces my time and frustration with this tool.

I updated to Photoshop version 22.5.0 and just noticed that File > Export > Export As has a majorly dumbed down JPEG quality menu. Photoshop is for professionals. Having accurate control over quality is import for optimizing to a small file size. Giving a few choices (and not even telling us what quality they are) is not acceptable for a pro app. I know for now I can go into prefs and use the legacy version, but please bring back the quality percentage!   I also posted this on the Photoshop Feedback website which I think is a more appropriate place to discuss this, but wanted to see what other people think. It's probably best to comment there so Adobe knows. Photoshop Feedback: Bring back JPEG quality percentage to Export As dialog    {Moderator edited title - PS-71391}

It would be helpful to number responses per asset. This way, we can more easily reference specific comments or feedback. Sometimes, it’s difficult to navigate through individual responses without a clear numbering system, especially when multiple assets or points are being discussed. Numbering would make communication clearer and more efficient.

resource not found cant download file : no action is being saved not even rename

I’d like to suggest that Adobe add folders or grouping options for artboards created in Photoshop.For example: If I create multiple artboards for Instagram stories or feed posts, I’d like the ability to group them together and minimize them within the same window.PS: I’m not referring to layer creation or grouping in the side panel.  

Hola Adobe 👋Soy diseñadora gráfica y trabajo con Illustrator, Photoshop e InDesign a diario. Estas aplicaciones comparten muchos paneles (Capas, Alinear, Color, Transformar, etc.), por lo que me gustaría poder crear un espacio de trabajo personalizado y universal, que se sincronice entre las apps de Creative Cloud.La idea es simple: si un panel existe en esa app, que se muestre en el lugar donde lo puse; si no, que lo ignore. Pero que respete mi estructura visual y estilo de trabajo, sin tener que volver a crear manualmente el espacio de trabajo en cada aplicación.Además, cada vez que hay una gran actualización, mis espacios personalizados desaparecen, y tengo que recrearlos desde cero. Sería ideal que pudiera guardar un único espacio de trabajo sincronizado en la nube, visible desde todas las apps compatibles.¡Gracias por considerar esta idea! Haría mucho más fluido el trabajo entre herramientas y mejoraría la experiencia de quienes usamos varias apps a diario.

i need request photoshop for audio or add feature on firefly name " rewrite or redub text edit for video or audio"

When the Face-Aware Liquify was added to the Liquify filter a long time ago,there was no option to reset individual value, and it could only be entered manually as 0.In both lightroom and the adjustment layer in photoshop, you can reset the by double-clicking slider ControllerPlease add this feature to the Liquify filter.

Hi,It would be greate if there was an option to save the layer filter visibility when saving layers comps.The only way to do this now is to duplicate a layer, set one layer with filter visibility option A, the other with filter visibility B and save the layer comp with differetn layer visibility.